CONTEXT: French interns in general practice are, like all medical students, exposed to medical errors during their training. OBJECTIVE: To measure the professional and personal impact of medical errors on French general practitioner (GP) trainees. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Quantitative and qualitative study of medical errors and GP trainees enrolled at Paris Diderot University. METHOD: An online anonymous questionnaire was sent to all GP trainees at Paris Diderot University and recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 volunteers. RESULTS: 70 of the 392 (18%) interns contacted replied to the questionnaire and 10 semi-structured interviews were then conducted. 97% of the participants had already made a medical error. Even with the extreme, conservative assumption that non-respondents would have reported no errors, the prevalence of self-reported medical errors in the whole sample would still have been 17%. 64% said they were at least strongly affected by their error and 74% made constructive changes to their work after the error. The interns revealed that the emotional impact of their errors were great with feelings such as guilt that could remain for more than 2 years after the event. 33% would have liked to talk more about the circumstances of their error with their superior. Most interns suggest more training on medical errors and more open-minded discussion when the error actually happens rather than formal training at the university. CONCLUSION: Medical errors remain a sensitive subject that is not broached enough in our university but interns need to talk about their experiences with their peers to improve risk management and prevent the recurrence of new errors.
CONTEXT: French interns in general practice are, like all medical students, exposed to medical errors during their training. OBJECTIVE: To measure the professional and personal impact of medical errors on French general practitioner (GP) trainees. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Quantitative and qualitative study of medical errors and GP trainees enrolled at Paris Diderot University. METHOD: An online anonymous questionnaire was sent to all GP trainees at Paris Diderot University and recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 volunteers. RESULTS: 70 of the 392 (18%) interns contacted replied to the questionnaire and 10 semi-structured interviews were then conducted. 97% of the participants had already made a medical error. Even with the extreme, conservative assumption that non-respondents would have reported no errors, the prevalence of self-reported medical errors in the whole sample would still have been 17%. 64% said they were at least strongly affected by their error and 74% made constructive changes to their work after the error. The interns revealed that the emotional impact of their errors were great with feelings such as guilt that could remain for more than 2 years after the event. 33% would have liked to talk more about the circumstances of their error with their superior. Most interns suggest more training on medical errors and more open-minded discussion when the error actually happens rather than formal training at the university. CONCLUSION: Medical errors remain a sensitive subject that is not broached enough in our university but interns need to talk about their experiences with their peers to improve risk management and prevent the recurrence of new errors.
Authors: Reema Harrison; Judith Johnson; Ryan D McMullan; Maha Pervaz-Iqbal; Upma Chitkara; Steve Mears; Jo Shapiro; Rebecca Lawton Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 2.243