Siran M Koroukian1, Paul M Bakaki, Derek Raghavan. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. skoroukian@case.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to compare survival and 5-year mortality by Medicaid status in adults diagnosed with 8 select cancers. METHODS: Linking records from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) with Ohio Medicaid enrollment data, the authors identified Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients aged 15 to 54 years and diagnosed with the following incident cancers in the years 1996-2002: cancer of the testis; Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma; early stage melanoma, colon, lung, and bladder cancer; and pediatric malignancies (n = 12,703). Medicaid beneficiaries were placed in the pre-diagnosis group if they were enrolled in Medicaid at least 3 months before cancer diagnosis, and in the peri/post-diagnosis group if they enrolled in Medicaid upon or after being diagnosed with cancer. The authors also linked the OCISS with death certificates and data from the US Census. By using Cox and logistic regression analysis, they examined the association between Medicaid status and survival and 5-year mortality, respectively, after adjusting for patient covariates. RESULTS: Nearly 11% of the study population were Medicaid beneficiaries. Of those, 45% were classified in the peri/post-diagnosis group. Consistent with higher mortality, findings from the Cox regression model indicated that compared with non-Medicaid, patients in the Medicaid pre-diagnosis and peri/post-diagnosis groups experienced unfavorable survival outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.82 and AHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.70-2.38, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid status was associated with unfavorable survival, even after adjusting for confounders. The findings reflect the vulnerability of Medicaid beneficiaries and possible inadequacies in the process of care.
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to compare survival and 5-year mortality by Medicaid status in adults diagnosed with 8 select cancers. METHODS: Linking records from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) with Ohio Medicaid enrollment data, the authors identified Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients aged 15 to 54 years and diagnosed with the following incident cancers in the years 1996-2002: cancer of the testis; Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma; early stage melanoma, colon, lung, and bladder cancer; and pediatric malignancies (n = 12,703). Medicaid beneficiaries were placed in the pre-diagnosis group if they were enrolled in Medicaid at least 3 months before cancer diagnosis, and in the peri/post-diagnosis group if they enrolled in Medicaid upon or after being diagnosed with cancer. The authors also linked the OCISS with death certificates and data from the US Census. By using Cox and logistic regression analysis, they examined the association between Medicaid status and survival and 5-year mortality, respectively, after adjusting for patient covariates. RESULTS: Nearly 11% of the study population were Medicaid beneficiaries. Of those, 45% were classified in the peri/post-diagnosis group. Consistent with higher mortality, findings from the Cox regression model indicated that compared with non-Medicaid, patients in the Medicaid pre-diagnosis and peri/post-diagnosis groups experienced unfavorable survival outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.82 and AHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.70-2.38, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid status was associated with unfavorable survival, even after adjusting for confounders. The findings reflect the vulnerability of Medicaid beneficiaries and possible inadequacies in the process of care.
Authors: Stefan Rieken; Angela Mohr; Daniel Habermehl; Thomas Welzel; Katja Lindel; Olaf Witt; Andreas E Kulozik; Wolfgang Wick; Jürgen Debus; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Cynthia D O'Malley; Sarah J Shema; Lisa S Clarke; Christina A Clarke; Carin I Perkins Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Blase N Polite; Jennifer J Griggs; Beverly Moy; Christopher Lathan; Nefertiti C duPont; Gina Villani; Sandra L Wong; Michael T Halpern Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aaron J Dawes; Rachel Louie; David K Nguyen; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Punam Parikh; Susan L Ettner; Clifford Y Ko; David S Zingmond Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Elizabeth M Jaffee; Chi Van Dang; David B Agus; Brian M Alexander; Kenneth C Anderson; Alan Ashworth; Anna D Barker; Roshan Bastani; Sangeeta Bhatia; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Otis Brawley; Atul J Butte; Daniel G Coit; Nancy E Davidson; Mark Davis; Ronald A DePinho; Robert B Diasio; Giulio Draetta; A Lindsay Frazier; Andrew Futreal; Sam S Gambhir; Patricia A Ganz; Levi Garraway; Stanton Gerson; Sumit Gupta; James Heath; Ruth I Hoffman; Cliff Hudis; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Ramy Ibrahim; Hossein Jadvar; Brian Kavanagh; Rick Kittles; Quynh-Thu Le; Scott M Lippman; David Mankoff; Elaine R Mardis; Deborah K Mayer; Kelly McMasters; Neal J Meropol; Beverly Mitchell; Peter Naredi; Dean Ornish; Timothy M Pawlik; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Martin G Pomper; Derek Raghavan; Christine Ritchie; Sally W Schwarz; Richard Sullivan; Richard Wahl; Jedd D Wolchok; Sandra L Wong; Alfred Yung Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Gary V Walker; Stephen R Grant; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Karen E Hoffman; Benjamin D Smith; Matthew Koshy; Pamela K Allen; Usama Mahmood Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bill J Wright; Alison K Conlin; Heidi L Allen; Jennifer Tsui; Matthew J Carlson; Hsin Fang Li Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Genevieve M Boland; George J Chang; Alex B Haynes; Yi-Ju Chiang; Ryaz Chagpar; Yan Xing; Chung-Yuan Hu; Barry W Feig; Y Nancy You; Janice N Cormier Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 6.860