Literature DB >> 22212456

Snake venomics of the pit vipers Porthidium nasutum, Porthidium ophryomegas, and Cerrophidion godmani from Costa Rica: toxicological and taxonomical insights.

Bruno Lomonte1, Paola Rey-Suárez, Wan-Chih Tsai, Yamileth Angulo, Mahmood Sasa, José María Gutiérrez, Juan J Calvete.   

Abstract

Within the Neotropical pit vipers, a lineage of primarily Middle American snake species referred to as the "Porthidium group" includes the genera Atropoides, Cerrophidion, and Porthidium. In this study, the venom proteomes of Porthidium nasutum, P. ophryomegas, and Cerrophidion godmani from Costa Rica were analyzed, and correlated to their toxic and enzymatic activities. Their HPLC profiles revealed a higher similarity between the two Porthidium species than between these and C. godmani. Proteins belonging to nine (P. nasutum), eight (P. ophryomegas), and nine (C. godmani) families were identified by mass spectrometry or N-terminal sequencing. Final cataloging of proteins and their relative abundances confirmed the close relationship between venoms of P. nasutum and P. ophryomegas, departing from that of C. godmani. Since the latter species had been taxonomically classified as Porthidium godmani previously, our venomic analyses agree with its current generic status. Venoms of P. nasutum and P. ophryomegas, despite containing abundant metalloproteinases and serine proteinases, lack procoagulant activity on human plasma, in contrast to venom of C. godmani. The latter induced strong myotoxicity in mice, which correlates with its high proportion of phospholipases A(2), whereas venoms from the two Porthidium species, containing lower amounts of these enzymes, induced only mild muscle damage.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22212456     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advances in venomics: Modern separation techniques and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tarek Mohamed Abd El-Aziz; Antonio G Soares; James D Stockand
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 2.  New approaches & technologies of venomics to meet the challenge of human envenoming by snakebites in India.

Authors:  David A Warrell; José Maria Gutiérrez; Juan J Calvete; David Williams
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  PhTX-II a basic myotoxic phospholipase A₂ from Porthidium hyoprora snake venom, pharmacological characterization and amino acid sequence by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Salomón Huancahuire-Vega; Luis Alberto Ponce-Soto; Sergio Marangoni
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 4.  A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes.

Authors:  Theo Tasoulis; Geoffrey K Isbister
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Detection and quantification of a β-neurotoxin (crotoxin homologs) in the venom of the rattlesnakes Crotalus simus, C. culminatus and C. tzabcan from Mexico.

Authors:  Edgar Neri-Castro; Arely Hernández-Dávila; Alejandro Olvera-Rodríguez; Héctor Cardoso-Torres; Melisa Bénard-Valle; Elizabeth Bastiaans; Oswaldo López-Gutierrez; Alejandro Alagón
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 6.  De Novo Assessment and Review of Pan-American Pit Viper Anticoagulant and Procoagulant Venom Activities via Kinetomic Analyses.

Authors:  Vance G Nielsen; Nathaniel Frank; Sam Afshar
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Differential Antivenom and Small-Molecule Inhibition of Novel Coagulotoxic Variations in Atropoides, Cerrophidion, Metlapilcoatlus, and Porthidium American Viperid Snake Venoms.

Authors:  Lee Jones; Nicholas J Youngman; Edgar Neri-Castro; Alid Guadarrama-Martínez; Matthew R Lewin; Rebecca Carter; Nathaniel Frank; Bryan G Fry
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Differences between Two Groups of Burmese Vipers (Viperidae: Azemiops) in the Proteomic Profiles, Immunoreactivity and Biochemical Functions of Their Venoms.

Authors:  Si-Rui Zheng; Yan Sun; Hong-Yan Zhao; Lin Wen; Xiang Ji; Jian-Fang Gao
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Bibliometric Analysis of Literature in Snake Venom-Related Research Worldwide (1933-2022).

Authors:  Fajar Sofyantoro; Donan Satria Yudha; Kenny Lischer; Tri Rini Nuringtyas; Wahyu Aristyaning Putri; Wisnu Ananta Kusuma; Yekti Asih Purwestri; Respati Tri Swasono
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.231

10.  Venomics of New World pit vipers: genus-wide comparisons of venom proteomes across Agkistrodon.

Authors:  Bruno Lomonte; Wan-Chih Tsai; Juan Manuel Ureña-Diaz; Libia Sanz; Diana Mora-Obando; Elda E Sánchez; Bryan G Fry; José María Gutiérrez; H Lisle Gibbs; Michael G Sovic; Juan J Calvete
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.044

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.