Literature DB >> 22212298

Population pharmacokinetics of cytarabine, etoposide, and daunorubicin in the treatment for acute myeloid leukemia.

Mikkel Krogh-Madsen1, Brendan Bender, Morten Krogh Jensen, Ove Juul Nielsen, Lena E Friberg, Per Hartvig Honoré.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cytarabine, etoposide, and daunorubicin following body surface area-adjusted doses calls for studies that point to other covariates to explain this variability. The purpose of this study was to investigate such relationships and give insights into the PK of this combination treatment.
METHODS: A prospective population PK study of twenty-three patients with acute myeloid leukemia was undertaken. Plasma concentrations of patients were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. PK models were developed with NONMEM; for daunorubicin, PK information from a prior study was utilized.
RESULTS: Baseline white blood cell count (bWBC) influenced the PK for all drugs. A small, statistically insignificant improvement in model fit was achieved when a relationship between bWBC and daunorubicin central volume of distribution was included. The volume increased 1.9% for each increase in bWBC by 1 × 10(6) cells/mL. The clearances of etoposide and cytarabine were significantly increased and decreased, respectively, by increased bWBC. Tenfold changes in bWBC were needed for these relationships to have potential clinical relevance. A decrease in creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min resulted in a decrease in etoposide clearance of 32%.
CONCLUSIONS: Population-based models characterized the PK for all three drugs. bWBC was a significant covariate for etoposide and cytarabine and showed a trend for daunorubicin. Linking the significant bWBC relationships and the relationship between kidney function and etoposide clearance to clinical end points would support dose individualization. Patients with above-normal creatinine clearances and high bWBC may receive sub-optimal treatment due to elevated etoposide clearances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22212298     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1800-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  15 in total

1.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Volasertib Administered in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia as a Single Agent or in Combination with Cytarabine.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; Angèle Fleury; Matthias Freiwald; Holger Fritsch; Karin Haug; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Persistent cytarabine and daunorubicin exposure after administration of novel liposomal formulation CPX-351: population pharmacokinetic assessment.

Authors:  Mina Nikanjam; Edmund V Capparelli; Jeffrey E Lancet; Arthur Louie; Gary Schiller
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Body mass index is a prognostic factor in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Taiki Ando; Etsuko Yamazaki; Eriko Ogusa; Yoshimi Ishii; Wataru Yamamoto; Kenji Motohashi; Takayoshi Tachibana; Maki Hagihara; Kenji Matsumoto; Masatsugu Tanaka; Chizuko Hashimoto; Hideyuki Koharazawa; Katsumichi Fujimaki; Jun Taguchi; Hiroyuki Fujita; Heiwa Kanamori; Shin Fujisawa; Hideaki Nakajima
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Towards better combination regimens of cytarabine and FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mohamed Elmeliegy; Jason Den Haese; Chetasi Talati; Meir Wetzler; William J Jusko
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Daunorubicin-Loaded DNA Origami Nanostructures Circumvent Drug-Resistance Mechanisms in a Leukemia Model.

Authors:  Patrick D Halley; Christopher R Lucas; Emily M McWilliams; Matthew J Webber; Randy A Patton; Comert Kural; David M Lucas; John C Byrd; Carlos E Castro
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 13.281

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of Daunorubicin in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Savitha Varatharajan; John C Panetta; Ajay Abraham; Sreeja Karathedath; Ezhilpavai Mohanan; Kavitha M Lakshmi; Nancy Arthur; Vivi M Srivastava; Sandeep Nemani; Biju George; Alok Srivastava; Vikram Mathews; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Construction of a Novel Magnetic Targeting Anti-Tumor Drug Delivery System: Cytosine Arabinoside-Loaded Bacterial Magnetosome.

Authors:  Qiongjia Deng; Yuangang Liu; Shibin Wang; Maobin Xie; Shenjian Wu; Aizheng Chen; Wenguo Wu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Genotypes Affecting the Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  Daphne Bertholee; Jan Gerard Maring; André B P van Kuilenburg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Nanomedicines for cancer therapy: state-of-the-art and limitations to pre-clinical studies that hinder future developments.

Authors:  Charlene M Dawidczyk; Luisa M Russell; Peter C Searson
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Pharmacokinetics and dose adjustment of etoposide administered in a medium-dose etoposide, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yuki Tazawa; Akio Shigematsu; Kumiko Kasashi; Junichi Sugita; Tomoyuki Endo; Takeshi Kondo; Takanori Teshima; Ken Iseki; Mitsuru Sugawara; Yoh Takekuma
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2016-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.