Literature DB >> 22212279

Transcriptome analysis of rin mutant fruit and in silico analysis of promoters of differentially regulated genes provides insight into LeMADS-RIN-regulated ethylene-dependent as well as ethylene-independent aspects of ripening in tomato.

Rahul Kumar1, Manoj K Sharma, Sanjay Kapoor, Akhilesh K Tyagi, Arun K Sharma.   

Abstract

A thorough understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying ripening is the prerequisite for genetic manipulation of fruits for better shelf-life and nutritional quality. Mutation in LeMADS-RIN, a MADS-box gene, leads to non-ripening phenotype of rin fruits in tomato. Characterization of ripening-inhibitor (rin) mutant has elucidated important role of ethylene in the regulation of climacteric fruit ripening. A complete understanding of this mutation will unravel novel genetic regulatory mechanisms involved in fruit ripening. In this study, fruit transcriptomes of two genotypes, including a cultivated Indian cultivar Solanum lycopersicum cv. Pusa Ruby and a homozygous line harboring the rin mutation (LA1795) were compared to get better insight into RIN-regulated ethylene-dependent and ethylene-independent events during ripening. Cluster analysis of ripening-related genes indicated a major shift in their expression profiles in rin mutant fruit. A total of 112 genes, exhibiting expression patterns similar to that of LeMADS-RIN in wild-type fruits, showed down regulation of expression in the rin mutant. In silico analysis of putative promoters of these genes for the presence of CArG box along with ERE and ethylene inducibility of these genes revealed that genes lacking CArG box in their regulatory regions could be indirectly regulated by LeMADS-RIN. New regulators of ethylene-dependent aspect of ripening were also identified. In this study, we have made an attempt to distinguish between ethylene-dependent and ethylene-independent aspects of ripening, which will be useful for developing strategies to improve fruit-related agronomic traits in tomato and other crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22212279     DOI: 10.1007/s00438-011-0671-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  84 in total

1.  New members of the tomato ERF family show specific expression pattern and diverse DNA-binding capacity to the GCC box element.

Authors:  Barthélémy Tournier; Maria Theresa Sanchez-Ballesta; Brian Jones; Edouard Pesquet; Farid Regad; Alain Latché; Jean-Claude Pech; Mondher Bouzayen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; M W Ganal; J P Prince; M C de Vicente; M W Bonierbale; P Broun; T M Fulton; J J Giovannoni; S Grandillo; G B Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  RIN transcription factor plays an important role in ethylene biosynthesis of tomato fruit ripening.

Authors:  Ling Li; Benzhong Zhu; Daqi Fu; Yunbo Luo
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.638

4.  The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato.

Authors:  C S Barry; M I Llop-Tous; D Grierson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit development: regulatory role of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase.

Authors:  L M Lois; M Rodríguez-Concepción; F Gallego; N Campos; A Boronat
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Transcriptional Analysis of Polygalacturonase and Other Ripening Associated Genes in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr Tomato Fruit.

Authors:  D Dellapenna; J E Lincoln; R L Fischer; A B Bennett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Carotenoid Biosynthesis during Tomato Fruit Development (Evidence for Tissue-Specific Gene Expression).

Authors:  P. D. Fraser; M. R. Truesdale; C. R. Bird; W. Schuch; P. M. Bramley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  The never ripe mutation blocks ethylene perception in tomato.

Authors:  M B Lanahan; H C Yen; J J Giovannoni; H J Klee
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  LE-ACS4, a fruit ripening and wound-induced 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Expression in Escherichia coli, structural characterization, expression characteristics, and phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J E Lincoln; A D Campbell; J Oetiker; W H Rottmann; P W Oeller; N F Shen; A Theologis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Transcriptome and metabolite profiling show that APETALA2a is a major regulator of tomato fruit ripening.

Authors:  Rumyana Karlova; Faye M Rosin; Jacqueline Busscher-Lange; Violeta Parapunova; Phuc T Do; Alisdair R Fernie; Paul D Fraser; Charles Baxter; Gerco C Angenent; Ruud A de Maagd
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  22 in total

1.  Fruit ripening mutants reveal cell metabolism and redox state during ripening.

Authors:  Vinay Kumar; Mohammad Irfan; Sumit Ghosh; Niranjan Chakraborty; Subhra Chakraborty; Asis Datta
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Fruit preferential activity of the tomato RIP1 gene promoter in transgenic tomato and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Priyanka Agarwal; Rahul Kumar; Amit Pareek; Arun K Sharma
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 3.  Molecular and genetic regulation of fruit ripening.

Authors:  Nigel E Gapper; Ryan P McQuinn; James J Giovannoni
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Integrated network analysis identifies fight-club nodes as a class of hubs encompassing key putative switch genes that induce major transcriptome reprogramming during grapevine development.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Palumbo; Sara Zenoni; Marianna Fasoli; Mélanie Massonnet; Lorenzo Farina; Filippo Castiglione; Mario Pezzotti; Paola Paci
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Genome-wide analysis of genes encoding MBD domain-containing proteins from tomato suggest their role in fruit development and abiotic stress responses.

Authors:  Adwaita Prasad Parida; Utkarsh Raghuvanshi; Amit Pareek; Vijendra Singh; Rahul Kumar; Arun Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Interaction between QTLs induces an advance in ethylene biosynthesis during melon fruit ripening.

Authors:  Juan Vegas; Jordi Garcia-Mas; Antonio Jose Monforte
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Comprehensive Profiling of Ethylene Response Factor Expression Identifies Ripening-Associated ERF Genes and Their Link to Key Regulators of Fruit Ripening in Tomato.

Authors:  Mingchun Liu; Bruna Lima Gomes; Isabelle Mila; Eduardo Purgatto; Lázaro E P Peres; Pierre Frasse; Elie Maza; Mohamed Zouine; Jean-Paul Roustan; Mondher Bouzayen; Julien Pirrello
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Identification and expression profiling of DNA methyltransferases during development and stress conditions in Solanaceae.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar; Pankaj Kumar Chauhan; Ashima Khurana
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.410

9.  A ripening-induced SlGH3-2 gene regulates fruit ripening via adjusting auxin-ethylene levels in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).

Authors:  Thula Sravankumar; NandKiran Naik; Rahul Kumar
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Molecular characterization of banana NAC transcription factors and their interactions with ethylene signalling component EIL during fruit ripening.

Authors:  Wei Shan; Jian-fei Kuang; Lei Chen; Hui Xie; Huan-huan Peng; Yun-yi Xiao; Xue-ping Li; Wei-xin Chen; Quan-guang He; Jian-ye Chen; Wang-jin Lu
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.