Literature DB >> 22211409

Impact of technical modification of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm on the occurrence of complications.

Kei Ito1, Naotaka Fujita, Yutaka Noda, Go Kobayashi, Takashi Obana, Jun Horaguchi, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Yusuke Kato, Yasunobu Yamashita.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of a modified technique of endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for lessening the occurrence of complications.
METHODS: Indications for EP were adenoma or well-differentiated adenocarcinoma confined to the papilla of Vater (T1) without tumor spread into the bile/pancreatic duct. Sixteen patients underwent the modified technique, which consists of resection with the Endocut mode, followed by biliary/pancreatic sphincterotomy and stenting (Group A). Twelve patients who had undergone EP, using a cutting current, followed by pancreatic duct stenting were included as control (Group B). The frequency of complications and clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients had adenoma, and 12 had adenocarcinoma. Early complications occurred in 36% of all patients (hemorrhage, 7; cholangitis, 3; perforation, 2; cholecystitis, 1). The frequency of early complications in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (6% vs 75%, odds ratio [OR] 0.022, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0020-0.25). Late complications occurred in 18% of the patients (bile duct stone, 3; hemorrhage, 1; pancreatitis, 1). There was no significant difference in the late complication rate between Group A and Group B (19% vs 17%). Local recurrences were found in 14% of the patients, without a significant difference between Group A and Group B (19% vs 8%) during a mean follow-up period. All recurrent tumors were successfully treated with argon plasma coagulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified technique of EP for ampullary neoplasm contributed to lessening the occurrence of early complications. However, further refinement of this technique is necessary for improving the clinical outcome.
© 2011 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2011 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22211409     DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  19 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-09-26

2.  Endoscopic papillectomy for neoplastic ampullary lesions: A systematic review with pooled analysis.

Authors:  Marco Spadaccini; Alessandro Fugazza; Leonardo Frazzoni; Milena Di Leo; Francesco Auriemma; Silvia Carrara; Roberta Maselli; Piera Alessia Galtieri; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Lorenzo Fuccio; Emad Aljahdli; Cesare Hassan; Prateek Sharma; Andrea Anderloni; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Extraduodenal papillectomy: a feasible alternative method of total papillectomy.

Authors:  Naohiro Sata; Masaru Koizumi; Yuji Kaneda; Yasunao Ishiguro; Akira Kurogochi; Kazuhiro Endo; Hideki Sasanuma; Yasunaru Sakuma; Alan Lefor; Yoshikazu Yasuda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Endoscopic papillectomy: The limits of the indication, technique and results.

Authors:  José Celso Ardengh; Rafael Kemp; Éder Rios Lima-Filho; José Sebastião Dos Santos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-10

6.  Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenomas: Different Outcomes in Sporadic Tumors and Those Associated with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Paolo Cecinato; Francesca Parmeggiani; Luca Braglia; Gabriele Carlinfante; Ramona Zecchini; Francesco Decembrino; Veronica Iori; Giuliana Sereni; Cristiana Tioli; Maurizio Cavina; Lorenzo Camellini; Francesco Azzolini; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Romano Sassatelli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on 227 patients.

Authors:  Hannah Gondran; Nicolas Musquer; Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-Robles; Pierre Henri Deprez; François Buisson; Arthur Berger; Elodie Cesbron-Métivier; Timothee Wallenhorst; Nicolas David; Franck Cholet; Bastien Perrot; Lucille Quénéhervé; Emmanuel Coron
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.802

Review 8.  Endoscopic versus surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ernesto Quaresma Mendonça; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura; Dalton Marques Chaves; André Kondo; Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao Pu; Felipe Iankelevich Baracat
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Therapeutic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications of Endoscopic Papillectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Ningli Chai; Mingyan Li; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  A long (7 cm) prophylactic pancreatic stent decreases incidence of post-endoscopic papillectomy pancreatitis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Minami; Eisuke Iwasaki; Shintaro Kawasaki; Seiichiro Fukuhara; Takashi Seino; Tadashi Katayama; Yoichi Takimoto; Hiroki Tamagawa; Yujiro Machida; Masayasu Horibe; Minoru Kitago; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.