| Literature DB >> 32213054 |
Marco Spadaccini1,2, Alessandro Fugazza1, Leonardo Frazzoni3, Milena Di Leo1, Francesco Auriemma4, Silvia Carrara1, Roberta Maselli1, Piera Alessia Galtieri1, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar5,6, Lorenzo Fuccio3, Emad Aljahdli7, Cesare Hassan8, Prateek Sharma5,6, Andrea Anderloni1, Alessandro Repici1,2.
Abstract
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a viable therapy in ampullary lesions (AL). Many series have reported low morbidity and acceptable outcomes. We performed a systematic review with pooled analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of EP for AL. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus and EMBASE) were searched up to September 2018. Studies that included patients with endoscopically resected AL were eligible. The rate of adverse events (AEs; primary outcome) and the rates of both technical and clinical efficacy outcomes were pooled by means of a random- or fixed-effects model to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Twenty-nine studies were included (1751 patients). The overall AE rate was 24.9%. The post-procedural pancreatitis rate was 11.9%, with the only factor affecting this outcome being prophylactic pancreatic stenting. The complete resection rate was 94.2%, with a rate of oncologically curative resection of 87.1%. The recurrence rate was 11.8% (follow-up: 9.6-84.5 months). EP is a relatively safe and effective option for AL. Our study might definitively suggest the protective role of prophylactic pancreatic stenting against post-procedural pancreatitis.Entities:
Keywords: ERCP; adenoma; ampullary lesion; duodenoscope; papillectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32213054 PMCID: PMC7006004 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619868367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: United European Gastroenterol J ISSN: 2050-6406 Impact factor: 4.623