Literature DB >> 22211405

Overview of upcoming advances in colonoscopy.

Wu Bin Cheng1, Michael A J Moser, Sivaruban Kanagaratnam, Wen Jun Zhang.   

Abstract

Although colonoscopy is a very commonly carried out procedure, it is not without its problems, including a risk of perforation and significant patient discomfort, especially associated with looping formation. Furthermore, looping formation may prevent a complete colonoscopy from being carried out in certain patients. The conventional colonoscope has not changed very much since its original introduction. We review promising technologies that are being promoted as a way to address the problems with current colonoscopy. There are some methods to prevent looping formation, including overtube, variable stiffness, computer-guided scopes, Aer-O-Scope, magnetic endoscopic imaging and the capsule endoscope. In recent years, with the progress of microelectromechanical and microelectronic technologies, many biomedical and robotic researchers are developing autonomous endoscopes with miniaturization of size and integration functionality that represent state of the art of the micro-robotic endoscope. The initial results by using aforementioned methods seem promising; however, there are some conflicting reports of clinical trials with the overtube colonoscope, the computer-guided scope and the variable stiffness colonoscope. There are also some limitations in the use of the Aer-o-scope and the capsule endoscope. The autonomous endoscope is based on a self-propelling property that is able to avoid looping completely. This novel technology could potentially become the next generation endoscope; however, there are still critical techniques to be approached in order to develop the effective and efficient novel endoscope.
© 2011 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2011 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22211405     DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01181.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels.

Authors:  Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Stuart Coleman; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Modeling Cable and Guide Channel Interaction in a High-Strength Cable-Driven Continuum Manipulator.

Authors:  Matthew S Moses; Ryan J Murphy; Michael D M Kutzer; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.303

3.  When and why a colonoscopist should discontinue colonoscopy by himself?

Authors:  Tao Gan; Jin-Lin Yang; Jun-Chao Wu; Yi-Ping Wang; Li Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar; Sagar Talele; Suresh Deshpande; Rupesh Ghyar; Sritam Rout; Bhallamudi Ravi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Robotics in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dan Cater; Arpita Vyas; Dinesh Vyas
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-06

6.  Modeling and in vitro experimental validation for kinetics of the colonoscope in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Wu-Bin Cheng; Yun-Yun Di; Edwin M Zhang; Michael A J Moser; Sivaruban Kanagaratnam; Louis Y Korman; Noune Sarvazyan; Wen-Jun Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.934

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.