BACKGROUND: We previously described a composite MRI scale combining T1-lesions, T2-lesions and whole brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS): the magnetic resonance disease severity scale (MRDSS). OBJECTIVE: Test strength of the MRDSS vs. individual MRI measures for sensitivity to longitudinal change. METHODS: We studied 84 MS patients over a 3.2±0.3 year follow-up. Baseline and follow-up T2-lesion volume (T2LV), T1-hypointense lesion volume (T1LV), and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) were measured. MRDSS was the combination of standardized T2LV, T1/T2 ratio and BPF. RESULTS: Patients had higher MRDSS at follow-up vs. baseline (p<0.001). BPF decreased (p<0.001), T1/T2 increased (p<0.001), and T2LV was unchanged (p>0.5). Change in MRDSS was larger than the change in MRI subcomponents. While MRDSS showed significant change in relapsing-remitting (RR) (p<0.001) and secondary progressive (SP) phenotypes (p<0.05), BPF and T1/T2 ratio changed only in RRMS (p<0.001). Longitudinal change in MRDSS was significantly different between RRMS and SPMS (p=0.0027); however, change in the individual MRI components did not differ. Evaluation with respect to predicting on-study clinical worsening as measured by EDSS revealed a significant association only for T2LV (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Results suggest improved sensitivity of MRDSS to longitudinal change vs. individual MRI measures. MRDSS has particularly high sensitivity in RRMS.
BACKGROUND: We previously described a composite MRI scale combining T1-lesions, T2-lesions and whole brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS): the magnetic resonance disease severity scale (MRDSS). OBJECTIVE: Test strength of the MRDSS vs. individual MRI measures for sensitivity to longitudinal change. METHODS: We studied 84 MSpatients over a 3.2±0.3 year follow-up. Baseline and follow-up T2-lesion volume (T2LV), T1-hypointense lesion volume (T1LV), and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) were measured. MRDSS was the combination of standardized T2LV, T1/T2 ratio and BPF. RESULTS:Patients had higher MRDSS at follow-up vs. baseline (p<0.001). BPF decreased (p<0.001), T1/T2 increased (p<0.001), and T2LV was unchanged (p>0.5). Change in MRDSS was larger than the change in MRI subcomponents. While MRDSS showed significant change in relapsing-remitting (RR) (p<0.001) and secondary progressive (SP) phenotypes (p<0.05), BPF and T1/T2 ratio changed only in RRMS (p<0.001). Longitudinal change in MRDSS was significantly different between RRMS and SPMS (p=0.0027); however, change in the individual MRI components did not differ. Evaluation with respect to predicting on-study clinical worsening as measured by EDSS revealed a significant association only for T2LV (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Results suggest improved sensitivity of MRDSS to longitudinal change vs. individual MRI measures. MRDSS has particularly high sensitivity in RRMS.
Authors: G R Cutter; M L Baier; R A Rudick; D L Cookfair; J S Fischer; J Petkau; K Syndulko; B G Weinshenker; J P Antel; C Confavreux; G W Ellison; F Lublin; A E Miller; S M Rao; S Reingold; A Thompson; E Willoughby Journal: Brain Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Xingchang Wei; Simon K Warfield; Kelly H Zou; Ying Wu; Xiaoming Li; Alexandre Guimond; John P Mugler; Randall R Benson; Leslie Wolfson; Howard L Weiner; Charles R G Guttmann Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Francesca Bagnato; Neal Jeffries; Nancy D Richert; Roger D Stone; Joan M Ohayon; Henry F McFarland; Joseph A Frank Journal: Brain Date: 2003-06-23 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Keren Regev; Brian C Healy; Fariha Khalid; Anu Paul; Renxin Chu; Shahamat Tauhid; Subhash Tummala; Camilo Diaz-Cruz; Radhika Raheja; Maria A Mazzola; Felipe von Glehn; Pia Kivisakk; Sheena L Dupuy; Gloria Kim; Tanuja Chitnis; Howard L Weiner; Roopali Gandhi; Rohit Bakshi Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Shahamat Tauhid; Renxin Chu; Rahul Sasane; Bonnie I Glanz; Mohit Neema; Jennifer R Miller; Gloria Kim; James E Signorovitch; Brian C Healy; Tanuja Chitnis; Howard L Weiner; Rohit Bakshi Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Rohit Bakshi; Mohit Neema; Shahamat Tauhid; Brian C Healy; Bonnie I Glanz; Gloria Kim; Jennifer Miller; Julia L Berkowitz; Riley Bove; Maria K Houtchens; Christopher Severson; James M Stankiewicz; Lynn Stazzone; Tanuja Chitnis; Charles R G Guttmann; Howard L Weiner; Antonia Ceccarelli Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 1.837