Literature DB >> 22209313

Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics.

Mark A Baldwin1, Chadd W Clary, Clare K Fitzpatrick, James S Deacy, Lorin P Maletsky, Paul J Rullkoetter.   

Abstract

In vitro pre-clinical testing of total knee replacement (TKR) devices is a necessary step in the evaluation of new implant designs. Whole joint knee simulators, like the Kansas knee simulator (KKS), provide a controlled and repeatable loading environment for comparative evaluation of component designs or surgical alignment under dynamic conditions. Experimental testing, however, is time and cost prohibitive for design-phase evaluation of tens or hundreds of design variations. Experimentally-verified computational models provide an efficient platform for analysis of multiple components, sizes, and alignment conditions. The purpose of the current study was to develop and verify a computational model of a dynamic, whole joint knee simulator. Experimental internal-external and valgus-varus laxity tests, followed by dynamic deep knee bend and gait simulations in the KKS were performed on three cadaveric specimens. Specimen-specific finite element (FE) models of posterior-stabilized TKR were created from magnetic resonance images and CAD geometry. The laxity data was used to optimize mechanical properties of tibiofemoral soft-tissue structures on a specimen-specific basis. Each specimen was subsequently analyzed in a computational model of the experimental KKS, simulating both dynamic activities. The computational model represented all joints and actuators in the experimental setup, including a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller to drive quadriceps actuation. The computational model was verified against six degree-of-freedom patellofemoral (PF) and tibiofemoral (TF) kinematics and actuator loading during both deep knee bend and gait activities, with good agreement in trends and magnitudes between model predictions and experimental kinematics; differences were less than 1.8 mm and 2.2° for PF and TF translations and rotations. The whole joint FE simulator described in this study can be applied to investigate a wide range of clinical and research questions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209313     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  28 in total

1.  Patellofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion after total knee replacement: a computational simulation.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Kun-Jhih Lin; Ting-Kuo Chang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Multibody muscle driven model of an instrumented prosthetic knee during squat and toe rise motions.

Authors:  Antonis P Stylianou; Trent M Guess; Mohammad Kia
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Finite element model of the knee for investigation of injury mechanisms: development and validation.

Authors:  Ali Kiapour; Ata M Kiapour; Vikas Kaul; Carmen E Quatman; Samuel C Wordeman; Timothy E Hewett; Constantine K Demetropoulos; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Analysis of different bicruciate-retaining tibial prosthesis design using a three dimension finite element model.

Authors:  Peiheng He; Xing Li; Shuai Huang; Minghao Liu; Weizhi Chen; Dongliang Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Estimating patient-specific soft-tissue properties in a TKA knee.

Authors:  Joseph A Ewing; Michelle K Kaufman; Erin E Hutter; Jeffrey F Granger; Matthew D Beal; Stephen J Piazza; Robert A Siston
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  A Combined Experimental and Computational Approach to Subject-Specific Analysis of Knee Joint Laxity.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Adam J Cyr; Azhar A Ali; Clare K Fitzpatrick; Paul J Rullkoetter; Lorin P Maletsky; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Validation of predicted patellofemoral mechanics in a finite element model of the healthy and cruciate-deficient knee.

Authors:  Azhar A Ali; Sami S Shalhoub; Adam J Cyr; Clare K Fitzpatrick; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Sagittal plane tilting deformity of the patellofemoral joint: a new concept in patients with chondromalacia patella.

Authors:  Ertugrul Aksahin; Cem Nuri Aktekin; Onur Kocadal; Semra Duran; Cüneyd Gunay; Defne Kaya; Onur Hapa; Murad Pepe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  A review of the combination of experimental measurements and fibril-reinforced modeling for investigation of articular cartilage and chondrocyte response to loading.

Authors:  Petro Julkunen; Wouter Wilson; Hanna Isaksson; Jukka S Jurvelin; Walter Herzog; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Comparison of Kinematics and Contact Mechanics in Normal Knee and Total Knee Replacements: A Computational Investigation.

Authors:  Liming Shu; Takashi Sato; Xijin Hua; Naohiko Sugita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.