Literature DB >> 22208736

Measurements of knee rotation-reliability of an external device in vivo.

Per O Almquist1, Charlotte Ekdahl, Per-Erik Isberg, Thomas Fridén.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee rotation plays an important part in knee kinematics during weight-bearing activities. An external device for measuring knee rotation (the Rottometer) has previously been evaluated for validity by simultaneous measurements of skeletal movements with Roentgen Stereometric Analysis (RSA). The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of the device.
METHOD: The within-day and test-retest reliability as well as intertester reliability of the device in vivo was calculated. Torques of 3, 6 and 9 Nm and the examiner's apprehension of end-feel were used at 90°, 60° and 30° of knee flexion. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 2,1 (ICC 2,1), 95% confidence interval (CI) of ICC and 95% CI between test trials and examiners were used as statistical tests. RESULT: ICC2,1 ranged from 0.50 to 0.94 at all three flexion angles at 6 and 9 Nm as well as end-feel, and from 0.22 to 0.75 at 3 Nm applied torque.
CONCLUSION: The Rottometer was a reliable measurement instrument concerning knee rotation at the three different flexion angles (90°, 60° and 30°) with 6 and 9 Nm applied torques as well as the examiner's apprehension of end-feel. Three Nm was not a reliable torque. The most reliable measurements were made at 9 Nm applied torque.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22208736      PMCID: PMC3264542          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system.

Authors:  G Selvik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

3.  Apparatus to obtain rotational flexibility of the human knee under moment loads in vivo.

Authors:  O S Mills; M L Hull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A mechanism for rotation restraints in the knee joint.

Authors:  L Blankevoort; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Femorotibial rotation and the Q-angle related to the dislocating patella.

Authors:  J Sanfridsson; A Arnbjörnsson; T Fridén; L Ryd; G Svahn; K Jonsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Do elite athletes exhibit enhanced proprioceptive acuity, range and strength of knee rotation compared with non-athletes?

Authors:  Q I Muaidi; L L Nicholson; K M Refshauge
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Measurement of varus-valgus and internal-external rotational knee laxities in vivo--Part II: relationship with anterior-posterior and general joint laxity in males and females.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Yohei Shimokochi; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Randy J Schmitz; Bruce D Beynnon; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Rotational motion of the knee.

Authors:  B Zarins; C R Rowe; B A Harris; M P Watkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  In vivo rotatory knee stability. Ligamentous and muscular contributions.

Authors:  S C Shoemaker; K L Markolf
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

2.  Repeatability and accuracy of a non-invasive method of measuring internal and external rotation of the tibia.

Authors:  David F Russell; Angela H Deakin; Quentin A Fogg; Frederic Picard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Robotic axial lower leg testing: repeatability and reproducibility.

Authors:  Thomas Branch; Shaun Stinton; Maya Sternberg; William Hutton; Frédéric Lavoie; Christian Guier; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The use of a robotic tibial rotation device and an electromagnetic tracking system to accurately reproduce the clinical dial test.

Authors:  S K Stinton; R Siebold; H Freedberg; C Jacobs; T P Branch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparison of a simplified skin pointer device compared with a skeletal marker for knee rotation laxity: A cadaveric study using a rotation-meter.

Authors:  Ken Lee Puah; Andy Khye Soon Yew; Siaw Meng Chou; Denny Tijauw Tjoen Lie
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-06-18

6.  Assessment of knee laxity using a robotic testing device: a comparison to the manual clinical knee examination.

Authors:  T P Branch; S K Stinton; R Siebold; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs; W C Hutton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.