| Literature DB >> 22207833 |
Hamid R Noori1, Casimir A Fornal.
Abstract
Optical fractionators have dominated the field of neural cell counting for two decades. These unbiased stereological techniques are often used for the quantification of hippocampal cell proliferation in neurogenesis experiments. However, the heterogeneous distribution of labeled cells, especially in the form of clusters, confounds the application of these techniques. A critical evaluation of the applicability of the optical fractionator suggests that absolute counting achieves higher efficiency in the quantification of cell proliferation than unbiased estimations.Entities:
Keywords: cell counting; hippocampal cell proliferation; optical fractionator; unbiased stereology
Year: 2011 PMID: 22207833 PMCID: PMC3245968 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Schematic representation of different sizes of the “area of the counting frame” (. Enlargement of the acf by optical fractionators is a common method used to improve the accuracy of the quantification results. For example, in (A) none of the labeled cells fall within the small counting frames, whereas in (C), the larger counting frames capture all of the labeled cells, due to the irregular distribution of the labeled cells. Increasing the size of the acfs clearly gives better results, but the existence of labeled cell clusters (non-homogeneity) suggests a strong dependency between the size of the acfs and the efficacy of this technique [note that the cell cluster located near the apex of the dentate gyrus is captured by the counting frames in (C) but not (B)]. The large acfs depicted in (C) cover most of the area of the dentate gyrus and therefore, the counting results are comparable with absolute cell counting for the same area.
Age-related decline in the number of Ki67-positive cells and clusters in the dentate gyrus of saline-treated male Sprague-Dawley rats (.
| 2 Month old | 3½ Month old | 13 Month old | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cell density | 1397 ± 74 | 836 ± 45 | 212 ± 14 |
| Cluster density | 135 ± 9 | 82 ± 8 | 9 ± 1 |
Labeled cells/clusters were counted bilaterally and are expressed per cubic millimeter of tissue. Values are means ± SEM. Data are from Cowen et al. (.
Figure 2Number of BrdU-positive and Ki67-positive cell clusters in the anterior (dorsal) versus posterior (ventral) dentate gyrus for a group of untreated adolescent (~6 week old) female Sprague-Dawley rats. This figure illustrates the large variability in both the total number and the regional distribution of labeled clusters within and between animals. Subjects were sacrificed 2 h after a single injection of BrdU (200 mg/kg, i.p.). Proliferating cells in the dentate gyrus were stained for both BrdU and the endogenous marker Ki67 using adjacent tissue sections from the same animal. For purposes of analysis, a cell cluster was defined as a grouping of three or more cells in close proximity (~5 μm) to each other.