Literature DB >> 2220691

Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.

R P Kusy1, J Q Whitley.   

Abstract

The surface roughness and the coefficients of friction were measured for sixteen arch wire-bracket combinations. The sample included one rectangular arch wire product from each of the four principal alloy groups and one bracket product from among the stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina inventory. Although subsamples representing both the 0.018-inch and the 0.022-inch slot sizes were evaluated, no differences were observed in their rankings. When tested over a series of eight incident angles, the optical surface roughness of representative stainless steel and alumina brackets averaged 0.148 and 0.193 microns, respectively. After testing at a single angle (82 degree) and referencing a nomogram, the roughness of the stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, beta-titanium, and nickel-titanium arch wire surfaces averaged 0.053, 0.129, 0.137, and 0.247 microns, respectively. When the various arch wire-bracket couples were pressed against an 0.010-inch stainless steel ligature wire at 34 degrees C and otherwise prevailing atmospheric conditions, the coefficients of friction ranged from stainless steel (lowest) to cobalt-chromium, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium (highest)--regardless of bracket product or slot size. These results corroborated earlier observations in which the same arch wire products were drawn between stainless steel or alumina contact flats. In the current research, the average coefficient of kinetic friction for the stainless steel couple (0.139) was less than that for the stainless steel arch wire against a polycrystalline alumina bracket (0.174).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2220691     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Frictional characteristics of composite orthodontic archwires against stainless steel and ceramic brackets in the passive and active configurations.

Authors:  S W Zufall; K C Kennedy; R P Kusy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effects of Diode and Nd:YAG Laser Irradiation on Friction Forces Between Two Types of Ceramic Brackets and Rhodium-Coated Archwires.

Authors:  Hannaneh Ghadirian; Allahyar Geramy; Mohammad Ali Keshvad; Soolmaz Heidari; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-14

3.  Comparison of frictional forces between aesthetic orthodontic coated wires and self-ligation brackets.

Authors:  Yunmi Kim; Jung-Yul Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang; Hyung Seog Yu; Seon Gun Tahk
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Debris, roughness and friction of stainless steel archwires following clinical use.

Authors:  Isabella Silva Vieira Marques; Adriana M Araújo; Júlio A Gurgel; David Normando
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires.

Authors:  Valiollah Arash; Mahmoud Rabiee; Vahid Rakhshan; Sara Khorasani; Farhad Sobouti
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  A comparative study of frictional resistance during simulated canine retraction on typodont model.

Authors:  Ram Sukh; Gulshan K Singh; Pradeep Tandon; Gyan P Singh; Alka Singh
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2013-04

7.  Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva--an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo; Matheus Melo Pithon; José Vinicius Bolognesi Maciel; Ana Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Choi; Da-Young Kang; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Frictional resistance of three types of ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Claire L Williams; Khaled Khalaf
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-01-01

10.  Frictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.

Authors:  Mariana Bulhoes Galvão; Matteo Camporesi; André Tortamano; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Efisio Defraia
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.