| Literature DB >> 22206454 |
Linn E Fosshaug1, Rolf K Berge, Jan O Beitnes, Kjetil Berge, Hogne Vik, Pål Aukrust, Lars Gullestad, Leif E Vinge, Erik Øie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the western world, heart failure (HF) is one of the most important causes of cardiovascular mortality. Supplement with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) has been shown to improve cardiac function in HF and to decrease mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). The molecular structure and composition of n-3 PUFA varies between different marine sources and this may be of importance for their biological effects. Krill oil, unlike fish oil supplements, contains the major part of the n-3 PUFA in the form of phospholipids. This study investigated effects of krill oil on cardiac remodeling after experimental MI. Rats were randomised to pre-treatment with krill oil or control feed 14 days before induction of MI. Seven days post-MI, the rats were examined with echocardiography and rats in the control group were further randomised to continued control feed or krill oil feed for 7 weeks before re-examination with echocardiography and euthanization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22206454 PMCID: PMC3281139 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Effect of krill oil on heart and lung weights and cardiac structure and function at baseline (before MI) and 1 and 8 weeks after induction of MI
| Control feed | Krill oil feed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | MI | MI-nPT | MI-PT | ||
| Baseline: | BW (g) | 273 ± 3 | 261 ± 3# | 271 ± 2 | 270 ± 2* |
| 1 week: | LVEDD (mm) | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 8.1 ± 0.2### | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 8.3 ± 0.2 |
| PWT (mm) | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1# | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | |
| FS (%) | 68 ± 2 | 21 ± 1### | 22 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 | |
| RWT | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1### | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 8 weeks: | BW (g) | 427 ± 7 | 397 ± 9# | 427 ± 8* | 425 ± 6* |
| TL (mm) | 38 ± 0.2 | 38 ± 0.4 | 38 ± 0.2 | 38 ± 0.3 | |
| HW/BW (mg/g) | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.2## | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.1* | |
| LW/BW (mg/g) | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.5## | 6.3 ± 0.7 | 4.3 ± 0.5** | |
| LVEDD (mm) | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.3### | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 9.8 ± 0.3 | |
| PWT (mm) | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.1## | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | |
| FS (%) | 69 ± 3 | 18 ± 1### | 16 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 | |
| RWT | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.1### | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | |
MI, myocardial infarction; nPT, non-pretreated; PT, pretreated; BW, body weight; TL, tibia length; HW, hearth weight; LW, lung weight; LEVDD, left ventricular diastolic diameter; PWT, posterior wall thickness; RWT, relative wall thickness; FS, fractional shortning. Values are mean ± SEM. #P ≤ 0.05 vs sham, ##P ≤ 0.01 vs sham, ###P ≤ 0.001 vs sham, *P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-control, **P ≤ 0.01 vs MI-control, ***P ≤ 0.001 vs MI-control, P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-nPT, P ≤ 0.01 vs MI-nPT, P ≤ 0.001 sv MI-nPT.
Figure 1Effect of krill oil on change in myocardial function and structure post-MI. MI, myocardial infarction; nPT, non-pretreated; PT, pretreated; BW, body weight; LVEDD, left ventricular diastolic diameter; PWT, posterior wall thickness; RWT, relative wall thickness; FS, fractional shortning.#P ≤ 0.05 vs sham *P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-control. P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-nPT.
Effect of krill oil on plasma lipid concentrations 8 weeks after MI
| Control feed | Krill oil feed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | MI | MI-nPT | MI-PT | |
| mmol/L | ||||
| Total cholesterol | 2.09 ± 0,14 | 1.93 ± 0.08 | 1.73 ± 0.10* | 1.59 ± 0.06** |
| HDL cholesterol | 1.31 ± 0.07 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | 1.22 ± 0.06 | 1.05 ± 0.04*** |
| LDL cholesterol | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02* | 0.16 ± 0.02** |
| Free cholesterol | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.02# | 0.42 ± 0.02* | 0.40 ± 0.01** |
| Triglycerides | 1.67 ± 0.24 | 1.12 ± 0.17 | 1.53 ± 0.14* | 1.59 ± 0.11** |
| Phospholipids | 2.19 ± 0.12 | 1.91 ± 0.06# | 1.75 ± 0.07 | 1.73 ± 0.05* |
| FFA | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.05# | 0.12 ± 0.03** | 0.11 ± 0.02*** |
| Glucose | 11.8 ± 0.47 | 11.6 ± 0.39 | 11.1 ± 0.37 | 10.8 ± 0.41 |
MI, myocardial infarction; nPT, non-pretreated; PT, pretreated; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; FFA, free fatty acids. Values are mean ± SEM. #P ≤ 0.05 vs sham, *P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-control, **P ≤ 0.01 vsMI-control, ***P ≤ 0.001 vs MI-control, P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-nPT.
Effect of krill oil on myocardial fatty acid composition 8 weeks after MI
| Control feed | Krill oil feed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | MI | MI-nPT | MI-PT | |
| μg FA/g tissue | ||||
| Total FA | 25240 ± 1342 | 24911 ± 3701 | 22585 ± 1912* | 23935 ± 1205 |
| wt.% of total FA | ||||
| Palmitic acid | 9.41 ± 0.25 | 11.07 ± 0.38## | 11.72 ± 0.11*** | 11.78 ± 0.11*** |
| EPA | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 1.58 ± 0.07*** | 1.75 ± 0.06*** |
| DPA | 2.04 ± 0.06 | 2.40 ± 0.09# | 3.62 ± 0.08*** | 3.61 ± 0.08*** |
| DHA | 8.98 ± 0.41 | 10.6 ± 0.44# | 16.06 ± 0.03*** | 15.77 ± 0.29*** |
| AA | 22.9 ± 0.42 | 23.77 ± 0.7# | 17.16 ± 0.32*** | 14.37 ± 0.29*** |
| SFA | 30.4 ± 0.25 | 31.8 ± 0.16### | 32.0 ± 0.17 | 31.3 ± 0.15 |
| MUFA | 8.03 ± 0.33 | 8.8 ± 0.77 | 8.36 ± 0.22 | 8.8 ± 0.18 |
| PUFA n-3 | 11.62 ± 0.44 | 13.6 ± 0.44## | 21.59 ± 0.27*** | 21.5 ± 0.31*** |
| PUFA n-6 | 49.72 ± 0.59 | 45.6 ± 0.58### | 37.89 ± 0.30*** | 38.2 ± 0.38*** |
| PUFA n-3/n-6 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.01### | 0.57 ± 0.01*** | 0.6 ± 0.01*** |
MI, myocardial infarction; nPT, non-pretreated; PT, pretreated; wt.%, weight percent; FA, fatty acids; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; AA, arachidonic acid; SFA, saturated FA; MUFA, monounsaturated FA; PUFA, polyunsaturated FA. Values are mean ± SEM. #P ≤ 0.05 vs sham, ##P ≤ 0.01 vs sham, ###P ≤ 0.001 vs sham, *P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-control, ***P ≤ 0.001 vs MI-control, P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-nPT, P ≤ 0.001 vs MI-nPT.
Alterations on genes involved in cardiac remodeling 8 weeks after MI
| Control feed | Krill oil feed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | MI | MI-nPT | MI-PT | |
| Relative units | ||||
| ANP | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 2.08 ± 0.35### | 2.48 ± 0.36 | 1.21 ± 0.19* |
| MMP-2 | 0.59 ± 0.13 | 2.44 ± 0.65# | 1.88 ± 0.39 | 2.41 ± 0.53 |
| MMP-9 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.20## | 1.28 ± 0.69 | 1.68 ± 1.30 |
| TIMP | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 1.71 ± 0.18# | 1.60 ± 0.24 | 1.05 ± 0.14* |
| CTGF | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.15 | 1.27 ± 0.19 |
| TGF-β | 0.95 ± 0.14 | 1.83 ± 0.22# | 1.90 ± 0.20 | 1.37 ± 0.11 |
| TNF-α | 1.39 ± 0.30 | 0.89 ± 0.20 | 2.24 ± 0.33** | 0.99 ± 0.14 |
| IL-1β | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 0.80 ± 0.10 | 1.11 ± 0.14 | 0.66 ± 0.07 |
| IL-6 | 0.88 ± 0.38 | 6.91 ± 2.38## | 4.37 ± 0.83 | 1.92 ± 0.30* |
| MCP-1 | 1.20 ± 0.43 | 2.43 ± 0.53 | 3.00 ± 0.54 | 1.19 ± 0.10 |
Values are mean ± SEM. #P ≤ 0.05 vs sham, ##P ≤ 0.01 vs sham, ###P ≤ 0.001 vs sham, *P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-control **P ≤ 0.01 vs MI-control, P ≤ 0.05 vs MI-nPT, P ≤ 0.01 vs MI-nPT.
Figure 2Experimental rat model and treatment protocol. Rats with transmural MIs were randomized in to three groups: 1) Krill oil prior to and after MI, 2) a control diet prior to and after induction of MI, or 3) a control diet prior to and 7 days after induction of MI, thereafter krill oil. Surviving rats were killed 8 weeks after the surgical procedure. In addition, a sham-operated group of rats were included on a normal feed for the entire length of the study.
Fatty acid composition (grams pr 100 g diet) of the feeds as determined from reference values for the soy and krill oils mixed into the feeds
| Fatty acid | Control diet | Krill oil diet |
|---|---|---|
| Palmitic acid | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| Stearic acid | 0.29 | 0.20 |
| Oleic acid | 1.46 | 1.12 |
| Linoleic acid | 3.27 | 2.12 |
| Alpha-linolenic acid | 0.44 | 0.30 |
| EPA | 0 | 0.30 |
| DHA | 0 | 0.17 |
| Arachidonic acid | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| SFA | 1.02 | 1.00 |
| MUFA | 1.48 | 1.18 |
| PUFA n-3 | 0.44 | 0.83 |
| PUFA n-6 | 3.27 | 2.12 |
| PUFA n-3/n-6 | 0.13 | 0.39 |
FA, fatty acids; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; SFA, saturated FA; MUFA, monounsaturated FA; PUFA, polyunsaturated FA.