PURPOSE: Adjuvant therapy using anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has shown treatment success for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB). Although there is ample evidence on how the antibody targets NB, in vivo contribution by GM-CSF remains unclear. This report investigates granulocyte activation and its correlation with treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled onto NCT00072358 received multiple treatment cycles, each consisting of anti-GD2 antibody 3F8 plus subcutaneous (SC) GM-CSF. Peripheral-blood (PB) samples from 151 patients were collected on day 0 and day 4 of cycle 1. PB from a subgroup of 35 patients had intravenous (IV) instead of SC GM-CSF during cycle 4. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD11a, CD63, CD87, and CD11b and its activation epitope CBRM1/5. RESULTS: Comparing cycle 1 day 4 PB samples with day 0 PB samples, five of five activation marker-positive granulocytes were significantly higher. The change in frequency and mean fluorescence intensity of CBRM1/5-positive granulocytes correlated with progression-free survival (PFS; P = .024 and P = .008, respectively). A multivariable analysis identified increasing CBRM1/5-positive granulocytes and missing killer immunoglobulin-like receptor ligand as positive independent prognostic factors for PFS, whereas second-line cyclophosphamide-based therapy before protocol entry negatively influenced outcome. Thirty-five patients who received SC GM-CSF at cycle 1 and IV GM-CSF at cycle 4 had significantly less CBRM1/5 activation after IV GM-CSF. In contrast, 63 patients who received SC GM-CSF at both cycles had comparable CBRM1/5 activation. CONCLUSION: GM-CSF-induced granulocyte activation in vivo is associated with improved patient outcome. This activation was more apparent when GM-CSF was given by the SC route instead of IV route.
PURPOSE: Adjuvant therapy using anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has shown treatment success for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB). Although there is ample evidence on how the antibody targets NB, in vivo contribution by GM-CSF remains unclear. This report investigates granulocyte activation and its correlation with treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled onto NCT00072358 received multiple treatment cycles, each consisting of anti-GD2 antibody 3F8 plus subcutaneous (SC) GM-CSF. Peripheral-blood (PB) samples from 151 patients were collected on day 0 and day 4 of cycle 1. PB from a subgroup of 35 patients had intravenous (IV) instead of SC GM-CSF during cycle 4. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD11a, CD63, CD87, and CD11b and its activation epitope CBRM1/5. RESULTS: Comparing cycle 1 day 4 PB samples with day 0 PB samples, five of five activation marker-positive granulocytes were significantly higher. The change in frequency and mean fluorescence intensity of CBRM1/5-positive granulocytes correlated with progression-free survival (PFS; P = .024 and P = .008, respectively). A multivariable analysis identified increasing CBRM1/5-positive granulocytes and missing killer immunoglobulin-like receptor ligand as positive independent prognostic factors for PFS, whereas second-line cyclophosphamide-based therapy before protocol entry negatively influenced outcome. Thirty-five patients who received SC GM-CSF at cycle 1 and IV GM-CSF at cycle 4 had significantly less CBRM1/5 activation after IV GM-CSF. In contrast, 63 patients who received SC GM-CSF at both cycles had comparable CBRM1/5 activation. CONCLUSION:GM-CSF-induced granulocyte activation in vivo is associated with improved patient outcome. This activation was more apparent when GM-CSF was given by the SC route instead of IV route.
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; C Patrick Reynolds; Robert C Seeger; Hiroyuki Shimada; E Stanton Adkins; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Robert B Gerbing; Wendy B London; Judith G Villablanca Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thorsten Simon; Barbara Hero; Andreas Faldum; Rupert Handgretinger; Martin Schrappe; Dietrich Niethammer; Frank Berthold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paolo Serafini; Rebecca Carbley; Kimberly A Noonan; Gladys Tan; Vincenzo Bronte; Ivan Borrello Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Irina Ostrovnaya; Irene Y Cheung; Deborah Kuk; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Karima Yataghene; N K Cheung Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Irene Y Cheung; Shakeel Modak; Ellen M Basu; Stephen S Roberts; Nai-Kong Cheung Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Irene Y Cheung; Shakeel Modak; Kim Kramer; Govind Ragupathi; Nai-Kong V Cheung Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Valerie R Wiersma; Marco de Bruyn; Ce Shi; Marloes J M Gooden; Maartje C A Wouters; Douwe F Samplonius; Djoke Hendriks; Hans W Nijman; Yunwei Wei; Jin Zhou; Wijnand Helfrich; Edwin Bremer Journal: MAbs Date: 2015 Impact factor: 5.857