PURPOSE: Antibody treatment is considered tolerable and potentially effective in the therapy of neuroblastoma. We have analyzed stage 4 neuroblastoma patients older than 1 year who underwent consolidation treatment with the chimeric monoclonal anti-GD2-antibody ch14.18. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage 4 patients older than 1 year who completed initial treatment without event were eligible. ch14.18 was scheduled in a dose of 20 mg/m2/d during 5 days in six cycles every 2 months. Patients who did not receive ch14.18 served as controls. RESULTS: Of 334 assessable patients, 166 received ch14.18, 99 received a 12-month low-dose maintenance chemotherapy (MT) instead, and 69 had no additional treatment. During 695 ch14.18 cycles, fever (55% of cycles), abnormal C-reactive protein without infection (35%), cough (24%), rash (22%), and pain (16%) were the main side effects. Univariate analysis found similar event-free survival (EFS) for the three groups (3-year EFS, 46.5% +/- 4.1%, 44.4% +/- 4.9%, 37.1% +/- 5.9% for patients treated with antibody ch14.18, MT, and no additional therapy, respectively; log-rank test, P =.314). For overall survival (OS), ch14.18 treatment (3-year OS, 68.5% +/- 3.9%) was superior to MT (3-year OS, 56.6% +/- 5.0%) or no additional therapy (3-year OS, 46.8% +/- 6.2%; log-rank test, P =.018). Separate univariate analysis of patients with autologous stem-cell transplantation revealed no difference between patients with ch14.18 treatment and no additional consolidation. Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate an advantage of antibody treatment for EFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Consolidation treatment of stage 4 neuroblastoma with ch14.18 was associated with considerable but manageable side effects. Compared with oral maintenance chemotherapy and no consolidation treatment, ch14.18 had no clear impact on the outcome of patients.
PURPOSE: Antibody treatment is considered tolerable and potentially effective in the therapy of neuroblastoma. We have analyzed stage 4 neuroblastomapatients older than 1 year who underwent consolidation treatment with the chimeric monoclonal anti-GD2-antibody ch14.18. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage 4 patients older than 1 year who completed initial treatment without event were eligible. ch14.18 was scheduled in a dose of 20 mg/m2/d during 5 days in six cycles every 2 months. Patients who did not receive ch14.18 served as controls. RESULTS: Of 334 assessable patients, 166 received ch14.18, 99 received a 12-month low-dose maintenance chemotherapy (MT) instead, and 69 had no additional treatment. During 695 ch14.18 cycles, fever (55% of cycles), abnormal C-reactive protein without infection (35%), cough (24%), rash (22%), and pain (16%) were the main side effects. Univariate analysis found similar event-free survival (EFS) for the three groups (3-year EFS, 46.5% +/- 4.1%, 44.4% +/- 4.9%, 37.1% +/- 5.9% for patients treated with antibody ch14.18, MT, and no additional therapy, respectively; log-rank test, P =.314). For overall survival (OS), ch14.18 treatment (3-year OS, 68.5% +/- 3.9%) was superior to MT (3-year OS, 56.6% +/- 5.0%) or no additional therapy (3-year OS, 46.8% +/- 6.2%; log-rank test, P =.018). Separate univariate analysis of patients with autologous stem-cell transplantation revealed no difference between patients with ch14.18 treatment and no additional consolidation. Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate an advantage of antibody treatment for EFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Consolidation treatment of stage 4 neuroblastoma with ch14.18 was associated with considerable but manageable side effects. Compared with oral maintenance chemotherapy and no consolidation treatment, ch14.18 had no clear impact on the outcome of patients.
Authors: Alice L Yu; Andrew L Gilman; M Fevzi Ozkaynak; Wendy B London; Susan G Kreissman; Helen X Chen; Malcolm Smith; Barry Anderson; Judith G Villablanca; Katherine K Matthay; Hiro Shimada; Stephan A Grupp; Robert Seeger; C Patrick Reynolds; Allen Buxton; Ralph A Reisfeld; Steven D Gillies; Susan L Cohn; John M Maris; Paul M Sondel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Schlegel; T Feuchtinger; C Nitschke-Gérard; U J Eva Seidel; A-M Lang; C Kyzirakos; H-M Teltschik; M Ebinger; M Schumm; E Koscielniak; R Handgretinger; P Lang Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Chrystal U Louis; Barbara Savoldo; Gianpietro Dotti; Martin Pule; Eric Yvon; G Doug Myers; Claudia Rossig; Heidi V Russell; Oumar Diouf; Enli Liu; Hao Liu; Meng-Fen Wu; Adrian P Gee; Zhuyong Mei; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop; Malcolm K Brenner Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jonathan Fisher; Pierre Abramowski; Nisansala Dilrukshi Wisidagamage Don; Barry Flutter; Anna Capsomidis; Gordon Weng-Kit Cheung; Kenth Gustafsson; John Anderson Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Kory L Alderson; Mitchell Luangrath; Megan M Elsenheimer; Stephen D Gillies; Fariba Navid; Alexander L Rakhmilevich; Paul M Sondel Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 6.968