Literature DB >> 22203579

The detection of pCR after PST by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for breast cancer.

Tomomi Fujisawa1, Tomoko Hirakata, Yasuhiro Yanagita, Misa Iijima, Hiroyuki Horikoshi, Koji Takeuchi, Yumi Saitoh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary systemic therapy (PST; such as chemotherapy) has been approved as the standard therapy. Breast-conserving surgery is involved in 60-70% of breast cancer operations, and cancer can spread in the period between the initial treatment and preoperative chemotherapy. To reduce the residual tumor in persistent disease of breast tissue, determining the margin including normal tissue when removing the tumor is very difficult. With the development of the color Doppler method, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) allows visualization of the tumor bloodstream. The availability and efficacy of CEUS for setting the resection margin in breast-conserving surgery were examined and compared with MRI imaging as tools for making decisions for breast-conserving surgery.
METHODS: One hundred seventy patients underwent breast cancer operations: 59 were PST(+) and 111 PST(-). Imaging studies, ultrasonography and MRI, to measure the size of the tumor were performed twice, before and after chemotherapy, for PST patients. This was carried out not only to measure the residual tumor size after PST, but also to detect whether pathologically complete response (pCR) had been achieved or not. Fifty-nine patients received CEUS after PST, and we determined the precision of CEUS and conventional US.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of CEUS for pCR was 80.0% (95% CI 0.571-0.88), specificity 98.0% (95% CI 0.933-0.996), positive predictive value 88.9% (95% CI 0.635-0.978) and negative predictive value 96.0% (95% CI 0.914-0.976). The difference between the pathological examination and ultrasonography, conventional ultrasonography and CEUS was -4.455 ± 2.02 and 2.582 ± 2.298 cm (95% CI -13.11 to -0.96, p = 0.0235); CEUS was near the diameter of the actual pathological examination.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is suitable for the preoperative examination, especially after PST, to determine the resection margin before breast-conserving surgery and detects pCR, which can help to avoid surgical procedures in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22203579     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-011-0311-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  5 in total

1.  Impact of parametric imaging on contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast cancer.

Authors:  Aya Noro; Takashi Nakamura; Toshiko Hirai; Masayo Haga; Toyoki Kobayashi; Akinobu Hayashi; Yuji Kozuka; Tokiko Nakai; Toru Ogura; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to determine clinical responses of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ai Amioka; Norio Masumoto; Noriko Gouda; Keiko Kajitani; Hideo Shigematsu; Akiko Emi; Takayuki Kadoya; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for intracystic breast tumors: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Kumiko Kato; Hiroko Nogi; Tomoyuki Ohta; Makiko Kamio; Yasuo Toriumi; Norio Nakata; Ken Uchida; Yukio Miyamoto; Hiroshi Takeyama
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment Modulation of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ioana Boca Bene; Sorin M Dudea; Anca I Ciurea
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-01-30

5.  Is there a Role for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in the Detection and Biopsy of MRI Only Visible Breast Lesions?

Authors:  Aki Nykänen; Otso Arponen; Anna Sutela; Ritva Vanninen; Mazen Sudah
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.991

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.