PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of CT of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) by comparing preoperative radiological and intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study collected 76 patients of PC from different disease origins. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated in each of the abdominopelvic region, and by tumor histologic type. RESULT: An overall sensitivity of CT was 69%. The detection rate was highest in appendix and lowest in stomach group( 84% and 47%, respectively) by the origin of primary disease. There was a lower detection rate (59% vs 79%, p=0.001), and a higher underestimation rate (29% vs 21%, p<0.05) of small bowel lesion compared with overall abdomino-pelvic region. CT predicted an individual regional PCI score accurately in 65%, underestimated in 24%, and overestimated in 11%. CT detection rate in small tumor (<0.5 cm) was 29%, and increased to 97% with nodules size exceeding 5 cm. CT significantly underestimated the clinical PCI value in overall. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of CT in detecting PC was influenced by histologic type, tumor location and size. CT underestimated the clinical PCI score in PC patient.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of CT of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) by comparing preoperative radiological and intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study collected 76 patients of PC from different disease origins. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated in each of the abdominopelvic region, and by tumor histologic type. RESULT: An overall sensitivity of CT was 69%. The detection rate was highest in appendix and lowest in stomach group( 84% and 47%, respectively) by the origin of primary disease. There was a lower detection rate (59% vs 79%, p=0.001), and a higher underestimation rate (29% vs 21%, p<0.05) of small bowel lesion compared with overall abdomino-pelvic region. CT predicted an individual regional PCI score accurately in 65%, underestimated in 24%, and overestimated in 11%. CT detection rate in small tumor (<0.5 cm) was 29%, and increased to 97% with nodules size exceeding 5 cm. CT significantly underestimated the clinical PCI value in overall. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of CT in detecting PC was influenced by histologic type, tumor location and size. CT underestimated the clinical PCI score in PC patient.