Literature DB >> 22200791

Relative biological effectiveness of high linear energy transfer α-particles for the induction of DNA-double-strand breaks, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in SW-1573 lung tumour cells.

Nicolaas A P Franken1, Suzanne Hovingh, Rosemarie Ten Cate, Przemek Krawczyk, Jan Stap, Ron Hoebe, Jacob Aten, Gerrit W Barendsen.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF) of DNA repair-related proteins accumulated at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites have been suggested to be a powerful biodosimetric tool. However, the relationship between IRIF induction and biologically relevant endpoints, such as cell death and formation of chromosome rearrangements is less clear, especially for high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. It is thus not sufficiently established whether IRIF are valid indicators of biological effectiveness of the various radiation types. This question is more significant in light of the recent advancements in light ion-beam and radionuclide therapy. Dose-effect relationships were determined for the induction of DNA-DSBs, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in cultured SW-1573 cells irradiated with γ-rays from a Cs-137 source or with α-particles from an Am-241 source. Values of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the high LET α-particles were derived for these effects. DNA-DSB were detected by scoring of γ-H2AX foci, chromosome aberrations by fragments and translocations using premature chromosome condensation and cell survival by colony formation. Analysis of dose-effect relations was based on the linear-quadratic model. Except for the survival curves, for other effects no significant contribution was derived of the quadratic term in the range of doses up to 2 Gy of γ-rays. Calculated RBE values derived for the linear component of dose-effect relations for γ-H2AX foci, cell reproductive death, chromosome fragments and colour junctions are 1.0±0.3, 14.7±5.1, 15.3±5.9 and 13.3±6.0, respectively. RBE values calculated at a certain biological effect level are 1, 4, 13 and 13, respectively. The RBE values derived from the LQ model are preferred as they are based on clinically relevant doses. The results show that with low LET radiation only a small fraction of the numerous DNA-DSBs yield chromosome damage and reproductive cell death. It is concluded that many of the chromosomal aberrations detected by premature chromosome condensation do not cause reproductive cell death. Furthermore, RBE values for DNA-DSB detectable by γ-H2AX foci shortly after irradiation, provide no information relevant to applications of high LET radiation in radiotherapy. The RBE values of chromosome aberrations assessed by premature chromosome condensation are close to the value for reproductive cell death. This suggests possible relevance to assess RBE values for radiotherapy with high LET ions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22200791     DOI: 10.3892/or.2011.1604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1021-335X            Impact factor:   3.906


  12 in total

Review 1.  Molecular pathways: targeted α-particle radiation therapy.

Authors:  Kwamena E Baidoo; Kwon Yong; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Radium-223 dichloride: a review of its use in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases.

Authors:  Matt Shirley; Paul L McCormack
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Induction of DNA Damage by Light Ions Relative to 60Co γ-rays.

Authors:  Robert D Stewart
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  α- Versus β-Emitting Radionuclides for Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Human Colon Cancer Xenografts.

Authors:  Sandra Heskamp; Reinier Hernandez; Janneke D M Molkenboer-Kuenen; Markus Essler; Frank Bruchertseifer; Alfred Morgenstern; Erik J Steenbergen; Weibo Cai; Christof Seidl; William J McBride; David M Goldenberg; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Cellular and Genetic Determinants of the Sensitivity of Cancer to α-Particle Irradiation.

Authors:  Brian D Yard; Priyanka Gopal; Kristina Bannik; Gerhard Siemeister; Urs B Hagemann; Mohamed E Abazeed
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Challenges in the quantification approach to a radiation relevant adverse outcome pathway for lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert Stainforth; Jan Schuemann; Aimee L McNamara; Ruth C Wilkins; Vinita Chauhan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Reduced contribution of thermally labile sugar lesions to DNA double strand break formation after exposure to heavy ions.

Authors:  Satyendra K Singh; Alena Bencsik-Theilen; Emil Mladenov; Burkhard Jakob; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; George Iliakis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Alpha Radiation as a Way to Target Heterochromatic and Gamma Radiation-Exposed Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Maja Svetličič; Anton Bomhard; Christoph Sterr; Fabian Brückner; Magdalena Płódowska; Halina Lisowska; Lovisa Lundholm
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Decay of γ-H2AX foci correlates with potentially lethal damage repair and P53 status in human colorectal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Bregje Van Oorschot; Arlene L Oei; Anna C Nuijens; Hans Rodermond; Ron Hoeben; Jan Stap; Lukas J Stalpers; Nicolaas A P Franken
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.787

Review 10.  DNA Damage-Inducing Anticancer Therapies: From Global to Precision Damage.

Authors:  Thom G A Reuvers; Roland Kanaar; Julie Nonnekens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.