Sandra Heskamp1, Reinier Hernandez2, Janneke D M Molkenboer-Kuenen3, Markus Essler4, Frank Bruchertseifer5, Alfred Morgenstern5, Erik J Steenbergen6, Weibo Cai2, Christof Seidl7,8, William J McBride9, David M Goldenberg9, Otto C Boerman3. 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands sandra.heskamp@radboudumc.nl. 2. Medical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Klinik und Poliklinik fur Nuklearmedizin, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 5. European Commission, Joint Research Centre-Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, Karlsruhe, Germany. 6. Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; and. 9. Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey.
Abstract
Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) with the β-emitting radionuclide 177Lu is an attractive approach to treat carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing tumors. The therapeutic efficacy of PRIT might be improved using α-emitting radionuclides such as 213Bi. Herein, we report and compare the tumor-targeting properties and therapeutic efficacy of 213Bi and 177Lu for PRIT of CEA-expressing xenografts, using the bispecific monoclonal antibody TF2 (anti-CEA × anti-histamine-succinyl-glycine [HSG]) and the di-HSG-DOTA peptide IMP288. Methods: The in vitro binding characteristics of 213Bi-IMP288 were compared with those of 177Lu-IMP288. Tumor targeting of 213Bi-IMP288 and 177Lu-IMP288 was studied in mice bearing subcutaneous LS174T tumors that were pretargeted with TF2. Finally, the effect of 213Bi-IMP288 (6, 12, or 17 MBq) and 177Lu-IMP288 (60 MBq) on tumor growth and survival was assessed. Toxicity was determined by monitoring body weight, analyzing blood samples for hematologic and renal toxicity (hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, creatinine), and immunohistochemical analysis of the kidneys. Results: The in vitro binding characteristics of 213Bi-IMP288 (dissociation constant, 0.45 ± 0.20 nM) to TF2-pretargeted LS174T cells were similar to those of 177Lu-IMP288 (dissociation constant, 0.53 ± 0.12 nM). In vivo accumulation of 213Bi-IMP288 in LS174T tumors was observed as early as 15 min after injection (9.2 ± 2.0 percentage injected dose [%ID]/g). 213Bi-IMP288 cleared rapidly from the circulation; at 30 min after injection, the blood levels were 0.44 ± 0.28 %ID/g. Uptake in normal tissues was low, except for the kidneys, where uptake was 1.8 ± 1.1 %ID/g at 30 min after injection. The biodistribution of 213Bi-IMP288 was comparable to that of 177Lu-IMP288. Mice treated with a single dose of 213Bi-IMP288 or 177Lu-IMP288 showed significant inhibition of tumor growth. Median survival for the groups treated with phosphate-buffered saline, 6 MBq 213Bi-IMP288, 12 MBq 213Bi-IMP288, and 60 MBq 177Lu-IMP288 was 22, 31, 45, and 42 d, respectively. Mice receiving 17 MBq 213Bi-IMP288 showed significant weight loss, resulting in a median survival of only 24 d. No changes in hemoglobin, platelets, or leukocytes were observed in the treatment groups. However, immunohistochemical analysis of the kidneys of mice treated with 17 or 12 MBq 213Bi-IMP288 showed signs of tubular damage, indicating nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study shows for the first time that PRIT with TF2 and 213Bi-IMP288 is feasible and at least as effective as 177Lu-IMP288. However, at higher doses, kidney toxicity was observed. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal dosing schedule to improve therapeutic efficacy while reducing renal toxicity.
Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) with the β-emitting radionuclide177Lu is an attractive approach to treat carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing tumors. The therapeutic efficacy of PRIT might be improved using α-emitting radionuclides such as 213Bi. Herein, we report and compare the tumor-targeting properties and therapeutic efficacy of 213Bi and 177Lu for PRIT of CEA-expressing xenografts, using the bispecific monoclonal antibody TF2 (anti-CEA × anti-histamine-succinyl-glycine [HSG]) and the di-HSG-DOTA peptide IMP288. Methods: The in vitro binding characteristics of 213Bi-IMP288 were compared with those of 177Lu-IMP288. Tumor targeting of 213Bi-IMP288 and 177Lu-IMP288 was studied in mice bearing subcutaneous LS174T tumors that were pretargeted with TF2. Finally, the effect of 213Bi-IMP288 (6, 12, or 17 MBq) and 177Lu-IMP288 (60 MBq) on tumor growth and survival was assessed. Toxicity was determined by monitoring body weight, analyzing blood samples for hematologic and renal toxicity (hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, creatinine), and immunohistochemical analysis of the kidneys. Results: The in vitro binding characteristics of 213Bi-IMP288 (dissociation constant, 0.45 ± 0.20 nM) to TF2-pretargeted LS174T cells were similar to those of 177Lu-IMP288 (dissociation constant, 0.53 ± 0.12 nM). In vivo accumulation of 213Bi-IMP288 in LS174T tumors was observed as early as 15 min after injection (9.2 ± 2.0 percentage injected dose [%ID]/g). 213Bi-IMP288 cleared rapidly from the circulation; at 30 min after injection, the blood levels were 0.44 ± 0.28 %ID/g. Uptake in normal tissues was low, except for the kidneys, where uptake was 1.8 ± 1.1 %ID/g at 30 min after injection. The biodistribution of 213Bi-IMP288 was comparable to that of 177Lu-IMP288. Mice treated with a single dose of 213Bi-IMP288 or 177Lu-IMP288 showed significant inhibition of tumor growth. Median survival for the groups treated with phosphate-buffered saline, 6 MBq 213Bi-IMP288, 12 MBq 213Bi-IMP288, and 60 MBq 177Lu-IMP288 was 22, 31, 45, and 42 d, respectively. Mice receiving 17 MBq 213Bi-IMP288 showed significant weight loss, resulting in a median survival of only 24 d. No changes in hemoglobin, platelets, or leukocytes were observed in the treatment groups. However, immunohistochemical analysis of the kidneys of mice treated with 17 or 12 MBq 213Bi-IMP288 showed signs of tubular damage, indicating nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study shows for the first time that PRIT with TF2 and 213Bi-IMP288 is feasible and at least as effective as 177Lu-IMP288. However, at higher doses, kidney toxicity was observed. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal dosing schedule to improve therapeutic efficacy while reducing renal toxicity.
Authors: Sandra Heskamp; Willemijn Hobo; Janneke D M Molkenboer-Kuenen; Daniel Olive; Wim J G Oyen; Harry Dolstra; Otto C Boerman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rafke Schoffelen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Gerben Franssen; Robert M Sharkey; David M Goldenberg; William J McBride; Edmund A Rossi; Annemarie Eek; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Edgar J Rolleman; Eric P Krenning; Bert F Bernard; Monique de Visser; Magda Bijster; Theo J Visser; Marcel Vermeij; Jan Lindemans; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-09-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Claudia Friesen; Gerhard Glatting; Bernd Koop; Klaus Schwarz; Alfred Morgenstern; Christos Apostolidis; Klaus-Michael Debatin; Sven N Reske Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Robert M Sharkey; Catharina M van Rij; Habibe Karacay; Edmund A Rossi; Cathelijne Frielink; Celeste Regino; Thomas M Cardillo; William J McBride; Chien-Hsing Chang; Otto C Boerman; David M Goldenberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Rafke Schoffelen; Wietske Woliner-van der Weg; Eric P Visser; David M Goldenberg; Robert M Sharkey; William J McBride; Chien-Hsing Chang; Edmund A Rossi; Winette T A van der Graaf; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: David M Goldenberg; Chien-Hsing Chang; Edmund A Rossi; William J; Robert M Sharkey Journal: Theranostics Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Stephen Ahenkorah; Irwin Cassells; Christophe M Deroose; Thomas Cardinaels; Andrew R Burgoyne; Guy Bormans; Maarten Ooms; Frederik Cleeren Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Fortuné M K Elekonawo; Susanne Lütje; Gerben M Franssen; Desirée L Bos; David M Goldenberg; Otto C Boerman; Mark Rijpkema Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Raffaella Rossin; Ron M Versteegen; Jeremy Wu; Alisher Khasanov; Hans J Wessels; Erik J Steenbergen; Wolter Ten Hoeve; Henk M Janssen; Arthur H A M van Onzen; Peter J Hudson; Marc S Robillard Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 14.919