Literature DB >> 22200510

Evaluation of variables affecting intraoperative aberrometry.

Jack Stringham1, Jeff Pettey, Randall J Olson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand some of the variable refractive changes that occur during routine cataract surgery that could affect the accuracy and effectiveness of intraoperative aberrometry as it relates to the postoperative refractive state.
SETTING: John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Phase 1 of this study assessed the cylinder induced by 2 eyelid speculums (open wire and closed wire) with corneal topographic images from participants without cataract. Phase 2 assessed the refractive change in cylinder, its axis, and the spherical equivalent (SE) in cataract patients within 1 hour of cataract surgery compared with 1 week after surgery. These measurements were taken using wavefront aberrometry, manual refraction, and corneal topography.
RESULTS: Phase 1 evaluated 99 corneal topographic images from 5 participants. The presence of a speculum induced erratic changes in cylinder and a statistically significant difference in axis when comparing the open-wire speculum and the closed-wire speculum (both P<.0001). In phase 2, which evaluated 10 patients, there was a significant change in the SE within 1 hour of cataract surgery compared with 1 week after surgery (P=.039).
CONCLUSION: Cataract surgery induced changes in cylinder, its axis, and the SE. This suggests that decisions based on intraoperative aberrometry may be inaccurate. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Olson has been a consultant to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Co., and Allergan, Inc., and has received grant support from Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. and Allergan, Inc. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22200510     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.09.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  Corrective Techniques and Future Directions for Treatment of Residual Refractive Error Following Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Michael V McCaughey; Luis Santiago-Caban
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12

2.  Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.

Authors:  Jan O Huelle; Toam Katz; Jan Draeger; Milena Pahlitzsch; Vasyl Druchkiv; Johannes Steinberg; Gisbert Richard; Stephan J Linke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Preoperative measurement vs intraoperative aberrometry for the selection of intraocular lens sphere power in normal eyes.

Authors:  James A Davison; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-17

Review 4.  Optimizing outcomes with toric intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Manpreet Kaur; Farin Shaikh; Ruchita Falera; Jeewan S Titiyal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Comparison between using INTEGRA and manual method in determining axis for intraocular lens implantation: Preliminary retrospective study.

Authors:  Marcin Jaworski; Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska; Piotr Jaworski; Krzysztof Jaskot; Robert Bieda; Richard Packard
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Intraoperative aberrometry compared to preoperative Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power selection in eyes with prior refractive surgery.

Authors:  Suzie A Gasparian; Saman Nassiri; Hyelin You; Abby Vercio; Frank S Hwang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.