Literature DB >> 22195175

Evaluation of HL7 v2.5.1 electronic case reports transmitted from a healthcare enterprise to public health.

Deepthi Rajeev1, Catherine Staes, R Scott Evans, Andrea Price, Mary Hill, Susan Mottice, Ilene Risk, Robert Rolfs.   

Abstract

Public health surveillance is necessary to prevent and control communicable and non-communicable diseases. An electronic reporting system using HL7 v2.5.1 was implemented between Intermountain Healthcare and the Utah Department of Health. We conducted prospective and retrospective studies to evaluate the timeliness, completeness of content information, and completeness of the electronic reporting process, and compared these metrics against other reporting entities. The electronic reporting system was more timely than other clinical reporting facilities and included more complete information in initial case reports. During a four month period, the electronic reporting system captured 8% of the cases not reported by the paper-based reporting system but missed 5% of the cases reported by the paper-based reporting system. We believe it would be more efficient for Infection Preventionists at hospitals to use their resources to detect cases not captured by the electronic reporting system instead of manually re-reporting cases already transmitted to public health electronically.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22195175      PMCID: PMC3243216     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  11 in total

1.  Statewide system of electronic notifiable disease reporting from clinical laboratories: comparing automated reporting with conventional methods.

Authors:  P Effler; M Ching-Lee; A Bogard; M C Ieong; T Nekomoto; D Jernigan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  A review of strategies for enhancing the completeness of notifiable disease reporting.

Authors:  Benjamin J Silk; Ruth L Berkelman
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2005 May-Jun

3.  Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Rebecca Wurtz; Bruce J Cameron
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Benefits and barriers to electronic laboratory results reporting for notifiable diseases: the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene experience.

Authors:  Trang Quyen Nguyen; Lorna Thorpe; Hadi A Makki; Farzad Mostashari
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Shaun Grannis; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Development of an electronic public health case report using HL7 v2.5 to meet public health needs.

Authors:  Deepthi Rajeev; Catherine J Staes; R Scott Evans; Susan Mottice; Robert Rolfs; Matthew H Samore; Jon Whitney; Richard Kurzban; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Disease reporting from an automated laboratory-based reporting system to a state health department via local county health departments.

Authors:  H D Backer; S R Bissell; D J Vugia
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Completeness of notifiable infectious disease reporting in the United States: an analytical literature review.

Authors:  Timothy J Doyle; M Kathleen Glynn; Samuel L Groseclose
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Development of a computerized infectious disease monitor (CIDM).

Authors:  R S Evans; R M Gardner; A R Bush; J P Burke; Y A Jacobson; R A Larsen; F A Meier; H R Warner
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1985-04

10.  Automatic electronic laboratory-based reporting of notifiable infectious diseases at a large health system.

Authors:  Anil A Panackal; Nkuchia M M'ikanatha; Fu-Chiang Tsui; Joan McMahon; Michael M Wagner; Bruce W Dixon; Juan Zubieta; Maureen Phelan; Sara Mirza; Juliette Morgan; Daniel Jernigan; A William Pasculle; James T Rankin; Rana A Hajjeh; Lee H Harrison
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lightweight application for generating clinical research information systems: MAGIC.

Authors:  Brane Leskošek; Marjan Pajntar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Identification of the necessary data elements to report AIDS: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mostafa Shanbehzadeh; Maryam Ahmadi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-12-25

3.  Strengthening Partnerships along the Informatics Innovation Stages and Spaces: Research and Practice Collaboration in Utah.

Authors:  Wu Xu; Warren Pettey; Yarden Livnat; Per Gesteland; Deepthi Rajeev; Jonathan Reid; Matthew Samore; R Scott Evans; Robert T Rolfs; Catherine Staes
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-12-22

4.  Timeliness of notification systems for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Corien Swaan; Anouk van den Broek; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of Data Exchange Process for Interoperability and Impact on Electronic Laboratory Reporting Quality to a State Public Health Agency.

Authors:  Sripriya Rajamani; Ann Kayser; Emily Emerson; Sarah Solarz
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2018-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.