Literature DB >> 22193054

Health-related quality of life and comorbidities associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Michele C Battié1, C Allyson Jones, Donald P Schopflocher, Richard W Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal stenosis is one of the most commonly diagnosed pathologies of the lumbar spine and the leading indication for spine surgery in adults aged 65 years and older. Yet, the burden of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) alone, and in combination with common comorbidities, on health-related quality of life (HRQL) is unknown as are comorbidities specifically associated with this chronic condition.
PURPOSE: To estimate the illness burden of LSS on HRQL, adjusting for the effects of specific comorbidities, age, and gender, and investigate whether specific comorbidities are associated with the condition. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A community-based cohort of 245 patients diagnosed with LSS was assembled and compared with a representative sample of 7,489 adults from the base population of Albertans responding to the Canadian Community Health Survey on HRQL and comorbidities.
METHODS: Health-related quality-of-life data were acquired through interviews for both groups using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3). Both groups were also queried about the presence of 13 specific chronic conditions. Linear regression was used to model HUI3 scores as a function of group, age, gender, and specific comorbid conditions. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of having particular comorbid conditions between the LSS and general population groups.
RESULTS: The mean unadjusted overall HUI3 scores were 0.60 for the LSS group and 0.85 for the general population (1=perfect health). After adjustment, HRQL deficits four times that deemed a clinically important difference remained between the groups. Controlling age and gender, the prevalence of arthritis, migraines, hypertension, and incontinence was significantly greater in the LSS group as compared with the general population sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosed LSS is associated with a very substantial burden of illness that is compounded by associated comorbidities, with implications for clinical care, health-care policy decisions, and research. Attention to comorbidities is particularly important in LSS.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22193054     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  16 in total

1.  Does the wait for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis surgery have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Christopher S Bailey; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; David Taylor; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; Corinne Tallon; Yves Bureau; Jennifer C Urquhart
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and psychosocial factors: a multicenter cross-sectional study (DISTO project).

Authors:  Miho Sekiguchi; Koji Yonemoto; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Takuya Nikaido; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Kinshi Kato; Koji Otani; Shoji Yabuki; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Gazzi Macedo; Abraham Hum; Laura Kuleba; Joey Mo; Linda Truong; Mankeen Yeung; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-25

4.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Christian Herren; Jan Siewe; Anne F Mannion; Christoph Röder; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pain Provocation and the Energy Cost of Walking: A Matched Comparison Study of Older Adults With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Peter C Coyle; Jenifer M Pugliese; J Megan Sions; Mark S Eskander; Jennifer A Schrack; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2019 Oct/Dec       Impact factor: 3.381

6.  Energy Impairments in Older Adults With Low Back Pain and Radiculopathy: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Peter C Coyle; Jenifer M Pugliese; J Megan Sions; Mark S Eskander; Jennifer A Schrack; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Health Characteristics, Neuromuscular Attributes, and Mobility Among Primary Care Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine T Schmidt; Rachel E Ward; Pradeep Suri; Laura Kurlinski; Dennis E Anderson; Dan K Kiely; Jonathan F Bean
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2017 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

8.  Disability, Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality in Lumbar Spine Fusion Patients-A 5-Year Follow-Up and Comparison With a Population Sample.

Authors:  Leevi Toivonen; Liisa Pekkanen; Marko H Neva; Hannu Kautiainen; Kati Kyrölä; Ilkka Marttinen; Arja Häkkinen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

9.  Waiting for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: suffering and a possibility to discover coping abilities.

Authors:  Björn Knutsson; Mats Jong; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén; Marika Augutis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-12-10

10.  The Need for Multidimensional Stratification of Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP).

Authors:  Yoga Raja Rampersaud; Andrew Bidos; Caroline Fanti; Anthony V Perruccio
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.