OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the impact of 2 common β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR) polymorphisms (G389R and S49G) in response to ventricular rate control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Randomized studies have shown that ventricular rate control is an acceptable treatment strategy in patients with AF. However, identification of patients who will adequately respond to rate-control therapy remains a challenge. METHODS: We studied 543 subjects (63% men; age 61.8 ± 14 years) prospectively enrolled in the Vanderbilt AF registry and managed with rate-control strategy. A "responder" displayed adequate ventricular rate control based on the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management) criteria: average heart rate (HR) at rest ≤80 beats/min; and maximum HR during a 6-min walk test ≤110 beats/min or average HR during 24-h Holter ≤100 beats/min. RESULTS: A total of 295 (54.3%) patients met the AFFIRM criteria. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in responders and nonresponders except for mean resting HR (76 ± 20 beats/min vs. 70 ± 15 beats/min; p < 0.01) and smoking (6% vs. 1%; p < 0.01). Multiple clinical variables (age, gender, hypertension) failed to predict response to rate-control therapy. By contrast, carriers of Gly variant at 389 were more likely to respond favorably to rate-control therapy; 60% versus 51% in the Arg389Arg genotype, p = 0.04. This association persisted after correction for multiple clinical factors (odds ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 2.03, p < 0.05). Among responders, subjects carrying the Gly389 variant required the lowest doses of rate-control medications; atenolol: 92 mg versus 68 mg; carvedilol: 44 mg versus 20 mg; metoprolol: 80 mg versus 72 mg; diltiazem: 212 mg versus 180 mg, and verapamil: 276 mg versus 200 mg, respectively (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a common β1-AR polymorphism, G389R, that is associated with adequate response to rate-control therapy in AF patients. Gly389 is a loss-of-function variant; consequently, for the same adrenergic stimulation, it produces reduced levels of adenyl cyclase, and hence, attenuates the β-adrenergic cascade. Mechanistically, the effect of rate-control drugs will be synergistic with that of the Gly389 variant, which could possibly explain our findings. These findings represent a step forward in the development of a long-term strategy of selecting treatment options in AF based on genotype.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the impact of 2 common β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR) polymorphisms (G389R and S49G) in response to ventricular rate control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Randomized studies have shown that ventricular rate control is an acceptable treatment strategy in patients with AF. However, identification of patients who will adequately respond to rate-control therapy remains a challenge. METHODS: We studied 543 subjects (63% men; age 61.8 ± 14 years) prospectively enrolled in the Vanderbilt AF registry and managed with rate-control strategy. A "responder" displayed adequate ventricular rate control based on the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management) criteria: average heart rate (HR) at rest ≤80 beats/min; and maximum HR during a 6-min walk test ≤110 beats/min or average HR during 24-h Holter ≤100 beats/min. RESULTS: A total of 295 (54.3%) patients met the AFFIRM criteria. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in responders and nonresponders except for mean resting HR (76 ± 20 beats/min vs. 70 ± 15 beats/min; p < 0.01) and smoking (6% vs. 1%; p < 0.01). Multiple clinical variables (age, gender, hypertension) failed to predict response to rate-control therapy. By contrast, carriers of Gly variant at 389 were more likely to respond favorably to rate-control therapy; 60% versus 51% in the Arg389Arg genotype, p = 0.04. This association persisted after correction for multiple clinical factors (odds ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 2.03, p < 0.05). Among responders, subjects carrying the Gly389 variant required the lowest doses of rate-control medications; atenolol: 92 mg versus 68 mg; carvedilol: 44 mg versus 20 mg; metoprolol: 80 mg versus 72 mg; diltiazem: 212 mg versus 180 mg, and verapamil: 276 mg versus 200 mg, respectively (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a common β1-AR polymorphism, G389R, that is associated with adequate response to rate-control therapy in AFpatients. Gly389 is a loss-of-function variant; consequently, for the same adrenergic stimulation, it produces reduced levels of adenyl cyclase, and hence, attenuates the β-adrenergic cascade. Mechanistically, the effect of rate-control drugs will be synergistic with that of the Gly389 variant, which could possibly explain our findings. These findings represent a step forward in the development of a long-term strategy of selecting treatment options in AF based on genotype.
Authors: L M Humma; B J Puckett; H E Richardson; S G Terra; T E Andrisin; B L Lejeune; M R Wallace; J F Lewis; D M McNamara; L Picoult-Newberg; C J Pepine; J A Johnson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: D G Wyse; A L Waldo; J P DiMarco; M J Domanski; Y Rosenberg; E B Schron; J C Kellen; H L Greene; M C Mickel; J E Dalquist; S D Corley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Bengtsson; O Melander; M Orho-Melander; U Lindblad; J Ranstam; L Råstam; L Groop Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-07-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Koustubh Ranade; Eric Jorgenson; Wayne H-H Sheu; Dee Pei; Chao Agnes Hsiung; Fu-tien Chiang; Yii-der I Chen; Richard Pratt; Richard A Olshen; David Curb; David R Cox; David Botstein; Neil Risch Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-02-18 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Patrick T Ellinor; Kathryn L Lunetta; Nicole L Glazer; Arne Pfeufer; Alvaro Alonso; Mina K Chung; Moritz F Sinner; Paul I W de Bakker; Martina Mueller; Steven A Lubitz; Ervin Fox; Dawood Darbar; Nicholas L Smith; Jonathan D Smith; Renate B Schnabel; Elsayed Z Soliman; Kenneth M Rice; David R Van Wagoner; Britt-M Beckmann; Charlotte van Noord; Ke Wang; Georg B Ehret; Jerome I Rotter; Stanley L Hazen; Gerhard Steinbeck; Albert V Smith; Lenore J Launer; Tamara B Harris; Seiko Makino; Mari Nelis; David J Milan; Siegfried Perz; Tõnu Esko; Anna Köttgen; Susanne Moebus; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Man Li; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Thomas J Wang; W H Linda Kao; Ramachandran S Vasan; Markus M Nöthen; Calum A MacRae; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Daniel Levy; Eric Boerwinkle; Andres Metspalu; Eric J Topol; Aravinda Chakravarti; Vilmundur Gudnason; Bruce M Psaty; Dan M Roden; Thomas Meitinger; H-Erich Wichmann; Jacqueline C M Witteman; John Barnard; Dan E Arking; Emelia J Benjamin; Susan R Heckbert; Stefan Kääb Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Janina M Jeff; Brian S Donahue; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford; C Michael Stein; Daniel Kurnik Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Mihai V Podgoreanu; Joseph P Mathew; Miklos D Kertai; Yen-Wei Li; Yi-Ju Li; Svati H Shah; William E Kraus; Manuel L Fontes; Mark Stafford-Smith; Mark F Newman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2014-07-21
Authors: David P Kao; Gordon Davis; Ryan Aleong; Christopher M O'Connor; Mona Fiuzat; Peter E Carson; Inder S Anand; Jonathan F Plehn; Stephen S Gottlieb; Marc A Silver; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Alan B Miller; Michel White; Guinevere A Murphy; Will Sauer; Michael R Bristow Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Tyler W Barrett; Wesley H Self; Brian S Wasserman; Candace D McNaughton; Dawood Darbar Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 2.469