Literature DB >> 22192665

Changes in renal function after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Tal Hasin1, Yan Topilsky, John A Schirger, Zhuo Li, Yanjun Zhao, Barry A Boilson, Alfredo L Clavell, Richard J Rodeheffer, Robert P Frantz, Brooks S Edwards, Naveen L Pereira, Lyle Joyce, Richard Daly, Soon J Park, Sudhir S Kushwaha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine renal outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.
BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction before LVAD placement is frequent, and it is unclear whether it is due to primary renal disease or to poor perfusion.
METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted in 83 consecutive patients implanted with HeartMate II continuous-flow LVADs (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, California). Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed on admission and 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation. To define predictors for improvement in GFR, clinical variables were examined in patients with decreased renal function (GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) before LVAD, surviving and dialysis-free at 1 month (n = 44).
RESULTS: GFR significantly increased from admission (53.2 ± 21.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) to 1 month after LVAD implantation (87.4 ± 27.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) (p < 0.0001). Subsequently, at 3 and 6 months, GFR remained significantly (p < 0.0001) above pre-LVAD values. Of the 51 patients with GFRs <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) before LVAD surviving at 1 month, 34 (67%) improved to GFRs >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Univariate pre-operative predictors for improvement in renal function at 1 month included younger age (p = 0.049), GFR improvement with optimal medical therapy (p < 0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump use (p = 0.004), kidney length above 10 cm (p = 0.023), no treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (p = 0.029), higher bilirubin (p = 0.002), higher Lietz-Miller score (p = 0.019), and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis indicated pre-operative improved GFR (slope = 0.5 U per unit improved; 95% confidence interval: 0.2 to 0.8; p = 0.003), atrial fibrillation (slope = 27; 95% confidence interval: 8 to 46; p = 0.006), and intra-aortic balloon pump use (slope = 14; 95% confidence interval: 2 to 26; p = 0.02) as independent predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with end-stage heart failure considered for LVAD implantation, renal dysfunction is reversible and likely related to poor renal perfusion.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192665     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  40 in total

1.  Management of Cardio-Renal Syndrome and Diuretic Resistance.

Authors:  Frederik H Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

2.  A patient with heart failure and worsening kidney function.

Authors:  Mark J Sarnak
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Management of the cardiorenal syndrome in decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 4.  Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Jeffrey M Testani; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5.  Kidney dysfunction and left ventricular assist device support: a comprehensive perioperative review.

Authors:  Samuel T Coffin; Dia R Waguespack; Nicholas A Haglund; Simon Maltais; Jamie P Dwyer; Mary E Keebler
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Benefits of Neurohormonal Therapy in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Rayan Yousefzai; Michela Brambatti; Hao A Tran; Rachel Pedersen; Oscar Ö Braun; Tina Baykaner; Roxana Ghashghaei; Nasir Z Sulemanjee; Omar M Cheema; Matthew Rappelt; Carmela Baeza; Abdulaziz Alkhayyat; Yang Shi; Victor Pretorius; Barry Greenberg; Eric Adler; Vinay Thohan
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 7.  Changes in renal function in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Guido Boerrigter; Berthold Hocher; Harald Lapp
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-12

8.  Prevalence and prognostic importance of changes in renal function after mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Stephen E Kimmel; Steven G Coca; Mary E Putt; Mariell Jessup; Wilson W H Tang; Chirag R Parikh; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 8.790

9.  Acute kidney injury and mortality following ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Abhijit Naik; Shahab A Akhter; Savitri Fedson; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Jonathan D Rich; Jay L Koyner
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Suneet N Purohit; William K Cornwell; Jay D Pal; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.