Literature DB >> 22192499

Auditory change detection in fragile X syndrome males: a brain potential study.

M J W Van der Molen1, M W Van der Molen, K R Ridderinkhof, B C J Hamel, L M G Curfs, G J A Ramakers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated involuntary change detection in a two-tone pre-attentive auditory discrimination paradigm in order to better understand the information processing mechanisms underlying attention deficits in fragile X syndrome (FXS) males.
METHODS: Sixteen males with the FXS full mutation and 20 age-matched control participants (mean age 29 years) were presented with series of auditory stimuli consisting of standard and deviant tones while watching a silent movie.
RESULTS: Brain potentials recorded to the tones showed that N1 and P2, sensory evoked potentials, were significantly enhanced in FXS compared to age-matched control participants. In contrast to controls, the N1 to standard tones failed to show long-term habituation to stimulus repetition in FXS. Additionally, both mismatch negativity and P3a generation, reflecting automatic change detection and the involuntary switch of attention, respectively, were significantly attenuated in FXS males.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that auditory stimulus discrimination in the FXS brain is already compromised during the pre-attentive stages of information processing. Furthermore, the apparent pre-attentive information processing deficiencies in FXS coincide with a weakness in the involuntary engagement of attentional resources. SIGNIFICANCE: The stimulus-driven information processing deficiencies in FXS might compromise information processing in several domains and, thus, present a key-deficit in FXS neurocognition.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22192499     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  40 in total

1.  Persistent gating deficit and increased sensitivity to NMDA receptor antagonism after puberty in a new mouse model of the human 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome: a study in male mice.

Authors:  Michael Didriksen; Kim Fejgin; Simon R O Nilsson; Michelle R Birknow; Hannah M Grayton; Peter H Larsen; Jes B Lauridsen; Vibeke Nielsen; Pau Celada; Noemi Santana; Pekka Kallunki; Kenneth V Christensen; Thomas M Werge; Tine B Stensbøl; Jan Egebjerg; Francois Gastambide; Francesc Artigas; Jesper F Bastlund; Jacob Nielsen
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Sensory processing in autism spectrum disorders and Fragile X syndrome-From the clinic to animal models.

Authors:  D Sinclair; B Oranje; K A Razak; S J Siegel; S Schmid
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Disrupted circuits in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability.

Authors:  Carla Em Golden; Joseph D Buxbaum; Silvia De Rubeis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Local cortical circuit correlates of altered EEG in the mouse model of Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Sonal Goswami; Sheridan Cavalier; Vinay Sridhar; Kimberly M Huber; Jay R Gibson
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Degraded speech sound processing in a rat model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Tracy M Centanni; Kwok W Im; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deletion rescues auditory evoked potential habituation deficit in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Teresa H Wen; Sarah Reinhard; Mike S Hsu; Harpreet Sidhu; Iryna M Ethell; Devin K Binder; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Developmental Changes in EEG Phenotypes in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Teresa H Wen; Jonathan W Lovelace; Iryna M Ethell; Devin K Binder; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Pairing Speech Sounds With Vagus Nerve Stimulation Drives Stimulus-specific Cortical Plasticity.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Navzer D Engineer; Jonathan R Riley; Jonathan D Seale; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Review of targeted treatments in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew Ligsay; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2016-08

10.  Electrocortical changes associated with minocycline treatment in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Andrea Schneider; Mary Jacena Leigh; Patrick Adams; Rawi Nanakul; Tasleem Chechi; John Olichney; Randi Hagerman; David Hessl
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.