Literature DB >> 22192195

A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey compared with Holstein milk for cheese production.

J L Capper1, R A Cady.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the environmental impact of Jersey or Holstein milk production sufficient to yield 500,000 t of cheese (equivalent cheese yield) both with and without recombinant bovine somatotropin use. The deterministic model used 2009 DairyMetrics (Dairy Records Management Systems, Raleigh, NC) population data for milk yield and composition (Jersey: 20.9 kg/d, 4.8% fat, 3.7% protein; Holstein: 29.1 kg/d, 3.8% fat, 3.1% protein), age at first calving, calving interval, and culling rate. Each population contained lactating and dry cows, bulls, and herd replacements for which rations were formulated according to DairyPro (Agricultural Modeling and Training Systems, Cornell, Ithaca, NY) at breed-appropriate body weights (BW), with mature cows weighing 454 kg (Jersey) or 680 kg (Holstein). Resource inputs included feedstuffs, water, land, fertilizers, and fossil fuels. Waste outputs included manure and greenhouse gas emissions. Cheese yield (kg) was calculated according to the Van Slyke equation. A yield of 500,000 t of cheese required 4.94 billion kg of Holstein milk compared with 3.99 billion kg of Jersey milk-a direct consequence of differences in milk nutrient density (fat and protein contents) between the 2 populations. The reduced daily milk yield of Jersey cows increased the population size required to supply sufficient milk for the required cheese yield, but the differential in BW between the Jersey and Holstein breeds reduced the body mass of the Jersey population by 125×10(3) t. Consequently, the population energy requirement was reduced by 7,177×10(6) MJ, water use by 252×10(9) L, and cropland use by 97.5×10(3) ha per 500,000 t of cheese yield. Nitrogen and phosphorus excretion were reduced by 17,234 and 1,492 t, respectively, through the use of Jersey milk to yield 500,000 t of Cheddar cheese. The carbon footprint was reduced by 1,662×10(3) t of CO(2)-equivalents per 500,000 t of cheese in Jersey cows compared with Holsteins. Use of recombinant bovine somatotropin reduced resource use and waste output in supplemented populations, with decreases in carbon footprint equivalent to 10.0% (Jersey) and 7.5% (Holstein) compared with nonsupplemented populations. The interaction between milk nutrient density and BW demonstrated by the Jersey population overcame the reduced daily milk yield, thus reducing resource use and environmental impact. This reduction was achieved through 2 mechanisms: diluting population maintenance overhead through improved milk nutrient density and reducing maintenance overhead through a reduction in productive and nonproductive body mass within the population.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192195     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  12 in total

1.  Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain.

Authors:  Amanda Laca; Natalia Gómez; Adriana Laca; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Rumen Bacterial Community Composition in Holstein and Jersey Cows Is Different under Same Dietary Condition and Is Not Affected by Sampling Method.

Authors:  Henry A Paz; Christopher L Anderson; Makala J Muller; Paul J Kononoff; Samodha C Fernando
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Quantitation and Identification of Intact Major Milk Proteins for High-Throughput LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS Analyses.

Authors:  Delphine Vincent; Aaron Elkins; Mark R Condina; Vilnis Ezernieks; Simone Rochfort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A study of the incidence of milk fever in Jersey and Holstein cows at a dairy farm in Beatrice, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Bernard Chiwome; Erick Kandiwa; Borden Mushonga; Shepherd Sajeni; Gervais Habarugira
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 1.474

5.  Which Factors Drive Consumer Decisions during Milk Purchase? New Individuals' Profiles Considering Fresh Pasteurized and UHT Treated Milk.

Authors:  Valentina Maria Merlino; Stefano Massaglia; Danielle Borra; Antonio Mimosi; Paolo Cornale
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-29

6.  Application of an Electronic Nose and HS-SPME/GC-MS to Determine Volatile Organic Compounds in Fresh Mexican Cheese.

Authors:  Héctor Aarón Lee-Rangel; German David Mendoza-Martinez; Lorena Diaz de León-Martínez; Alejandro Enrique Relling; Anayeli Vazquez-Valladolid; Monika Palacios-Martínez; Pedro Abel Hernández-García; Alfonso Juventino Chay-Canul; Rogelio Flores-Ramirez; José Alejandro Roque-Jiménez
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 7.  Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.

Authors:  Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Content and Composition of Branched-Chain Fatty Acids in Bovine Milk Are Affected by Lactation Stage and Breed of Dairy Cow.

Authors:  Melissa L Bainbridge; Laura M Cersosimo; André-Denis G Wright; Jana Kraft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Milk Bottom-Up Proteomics: Method Optimization.

Authors:  Delphine Vincent; Vilnis Ezernieks; Aaron Elkins; Nga Nguyen; Peter J Moate; Benjamin G Cocks; Simone Rochfort
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.

Authors:  Judith L Capper; Roger A Cady
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.