Literature DB >> 22192049

Criticality of the geological copper family.

Nedal T Nassar1, Rachel Barr, Matthew Browning, Zhouwei Diao, Elizabeth Friedlander, E M Harper, Claire Henly, Goksin Kavlak, Sameer Kwatra, Christine Jun, Simon Warren, Man-Yu Yang, T E Graedel.   

Abstract

Because modern technology depends on reliable supplies of a wide variety of materials, and because of increasing concern about those supplies, a comprehensive methodology has been created to quantify the degree of criticality of the metals of the periodic table. In this paper, we apply this methodology to the elements of the geological copper family: Cu, As, Se, Ag, Te, and Au. These elements are technologically important, but show a substantial variation in different factors relating to their supply risk, vulnerability to supply restriction, and environmental implications. Assessments are made on corporate, national, and global levels for year 2008. Evaluations of each of the multiple indicators are presented and the results plotted in "criticality space", together with Monte Carlo simulation-derived "uncertainty cloud" estimates for each of the aggregated evaluations. For supply risk over both the medium term and long term, As is the highest risk of the six metals, with Se and Ag nearly as high. Gold has the most severe environmental implications ranking. Vulnerability to supply restriction (VSR) at the corporate level for an invented solar cell manufacturing firm shows Se, Te, and Cu as approximately equal, Cu has the highest VSR at the national level, and Cu and Au have the highest VSRs at the global level. Criticality vector magnitudes are greatest at the global level for As (and then Au and Ag) and at the national level for As and Au; at the corporate level, Se is highest with Te and Cu lower. An extension of this work, now in progress, will provide criticality estimates for several different development scenarios for the period 2010-2050.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192049     DOI: 10.1021/es203535w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  On the materials basis of modern society.

Authors:  T E Graedel; E M Harper; N T Nassar; Barbara K Reck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Criticality of metals and metalloids.

Authors:  T E Graedel; E M Harper; N T Nassar; Philip Nuss; Barbara K Reck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recovery of Critical Metals from Aqueous Sources.

Authors:  Serife E Can Sener; Valerie M Thomas; David E Hogan; Raina M Maier; Michael Carbajales-Dale; Mark D Barton; Tanju Karanfil; John C Crittenden; Gary L Amy
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 9.224

4.  Global flows of critical metals necessary for low-carbon technologies: the case of neodymium, cobalt, and platinum.

Authors:  Keisuke Nansai; Kenichi Nakajima; Shigemi Kagawa; Yasushi Kondo; Sangwon Suh; Yosuke Shigetomi; Yuko Oshita
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Influence of Composition on the Environmental Impact of a Cast Aluminum Alloy.

Authors:  Patricia Gómez; Daniel Elduque; Judith Sarasa; Carmelo Pina; Carlos Javierre
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Improved Copper Circularity as a Result of Increased Material Efficiency in the U.S. Housing Stock.

Authors:  Tong Wang; Peter Berrill; Julie Beth Zimmerman; Narasimha D Rao; Jihoon Min; Edgar G Hertwich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality.

Authors:  Xianlai Zeng
Journal:  Front Environ Sci Eng       Date:  2022-09-05

8.  By-product metals are technologically essential but have problematic supply.

Authors:  N T Nassar; T E Graedel; E M Harper
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis.

Authors:  Philip Nuss; Matthew J Eckelman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.