Literature DB >> 22190003

Cardiomyocyte death: mechanisms and translational implications.

M Chiong1, Z V Wang, Z Pedrozo, D J Cao, R Troncoso, M Ibacache, A Criollo, A Nemchenko, J A Hill, S Lavandero.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although treatments have improved, development of novel therapies for patients with CVD remains a major research goal. Apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy occur in cardiac myocytes, and both gradual and acute cell death are hallmarks of cardiac pathology, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, and ischemia/reperfusion. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of autophagy, apoptosis, or necrosis diminishes infarct size and improves cardiac function in these disorders. Here, we review recent progress in the fields of autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis. In addition, we highlight the involvement of these mechanisms in cardiac pathology and discuss potential translational implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22190003      PMCID: PMC3252742          DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2011.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Dis            Impact factor:   8.469


Cardiac Myocyte Death in the Pathogenesis of Disease

The heart is an organ with limited capacity for regeneration and repair; hence, it is susceptible to numerous stresses and must respond to these insults in order to adapt to ever-changing workload demands. Cell death, either progressive or acute, is a hallmark characteristic of various cardiac diseases, including heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R; Figure 1).[1] Now, at the turn of the 21st century, however, cardiovascular disease (CVD) still accounts for more than one-third of all human mortality and remains the leading cause of death worldwide. All three types of cell death, autophagic cell death, apoptosis, and necrosis, have been observed during progression of heart disease.[1]
Figure 1

Aging, stress, and cell death progression. The cell injury marker troponin T increased during aging, as well as with different CVDs (de Lemos et al.)

Autophagy

One of the key cellular pathways that mediate stress-induced adaptation and damage control is macroautophagy (termed autophagy in this review). Autophagy is a highly conserved process of delivery of intracellular components, including mitochondria and long-lived macromolecules, via a double-membrane structure (autophagosome) to lysosomes for degradation.[2] In eukaryotic cells[2] and in cardiac myocytes,[3] starvation/nutrient deprivation, hypoxia, reactive oxygen species (ROS), damaged organelles, and protein aggregates have each been shown to induce autophagy in a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent process. Similarly, mTOR-independent autophagy has been reported; cytokines, which do not exist in yeast, converge on type III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to induce autophagy.[4]

Autophagy in Response to Ischemia and I/R

More than 95% of the energy required for cardiac myocyte function is derived from oxidative phosphorylation. Interruption of blood flow to the myocardium disrupts oxygen supply, triggering rapid declines in ATP and increased AMP/ATP ratios. Autophagy, as a pro-survival mechanism that replenishes energy under stress conditions, is activated. Ischemia/hypoxia induces autophagy in vivo and in vitro in most,[5, 6] although not all,[7] studies. The two pathways responsible for ischemia/hypoxia-induced autophagy involve either BNIP3[8] or AMPK.[9] In a mouse model expressing dominant-negative AMPK in cardiac myocytes, the autophagic response to ischemia was attenuated, leading to larger MI and worse cardiac function.[9] If ischemia is prolonged, the autophagic response becomes dysfunctional, as evidenced by the existence of impaired autolysosomes. During reperfusion, autophagy is upregulated further, even though the delivery of oxygen and nutrients is restored and AMPK is rapidly inactivated.[5, 10] The continued activation of autophagy during reperfusion is qualitatively different than that in ischemia, especially in terms of mechanisms of induction. Stimulators, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage/BNIP3, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and calcium overload, likely have more important roles in maintaining autophagy at a higher level during reperfusion.[11] Although the available evidence is consistent that autophagy is protective under conditions of mild-to-moderate ischemia, the same cannot be said of autophagy elicited by reperfusion. Indeed, upregulation of autophagy can be either beneficial or detrimental in the context of I/R.[5, 10] Recent evidence reveals that autophagosome clearance is impaired in I/R. Ischemia induces a decline in the levels of LAMP2, a protein critical for autophagosome–lysosome fusion, mediated by ROS-induced activation of serine and cysteine proteases; reperfusion induces upregulation of Beclin 1, which further impairs autophagosome processing, culminating in increased ROS generation, mitochondrial permeabilization, and cardiomyocyte death.[12] More investigation is needed to clarify when and how elevated autophagy may be pro-survival to cardiac myocytes subjected to reperfusion injury.

Autophagy in Response to MI

There is limited information regarding autophagy in the context of MI. The most likely region where autophagy might be important is the sublethally injured, peri-infarct zone. In addition, autophagy may contribute to the more global process of postinfarction remodeling. Activation of AMPK by metformin blunted development of HF induced by MI, and inhibiting mTOR led to reduced remodeling and improved cardiac function after MI.[13] Moreover, STAT1 deficiency is protective by enhancing autophagy in an ex vivo model of MI.[14] However, the possible role of autophagic flux in the heart was not examined in these studies. Although these data suggest that agents known to regulate pathways that augment autophagy were protective, direct evidence is lacking regarding the specific role that autophagy has in MI.

Autophagy in Response to Cardiac Hypertrophy and HF

In response to hemodynamic stress, such as pressure overload, the heart hypertrophies. Cardiac hypertrophy (CH) is thought to be an adaptive process initially; however, it becomes detrimental to cardiac function if left unchecked. CH is a major, independent risk factor for systolic dysfunction and clinical HF.[15] In HF patients, cardiac myocyte death with autophagic features occurred at a rate of 0.03% in human-dilated cardiomyopathy (C), as compared with 0.002% for apoptotic cell death.[16] Together, these lines of evidence support the notion that autophagy participates in the pathogenesis of HF. The specific role of autophagy, however, in the pathogenesis of CH and HF-related remodeling is less clear. The strongest evidence that autophagy facilitates development of pathological hypertrophy derives from genetic manipulations of the core autophagic machinery in mouse models.[17, 18] In contrast, several lines of evidence highlight the fact that autophagy can have an anti-hypertrophic role. The latter notion, however, requires additional corroboration, as it relies largely on indirect pharmaceutical manipulations of autophagy via upstream pathways.[19, 20, 21] Here, we will briefly detail the studies supporting both concepts (see Figure 2 for an overview of major regulators of autophagy targeted in these studies).
Figure 2

Schematic overview of the regulators of autophagy described in this section: Atg5 and Beclin 1 – components of the core autophagic machinery; mTOR and Raptor are components of the mTOR complex 1, an upstream repressor of autophagy; rapamycin – an inhibitor of mTOR (activates autophagy by releasing mTOR-mediated inhibition)

CH was attenuated in Beclin 1 haploinsufficient hearts. Overexpression of Beclin 1 led to exacerbated hypertrophic growth in response to pressure overload.[18] Importantly, a recent study by our group suggested that autophagy is necessary for the process of CH. In this study, moderate pressure overload that induces CH also activated autophagy, and blocking this process inhibited pathological heart remodeling. RNAi-dependent knockdown of ATG5 and Beclin 1 attenuated the growth response induced by hypertrophic agonists.[17] Conversely, inhibition of mTOR, an upstream repressor of autophagy, blunts CH, both clinically and in an animal model.[20, 22] However, the status of autophagy in these patients and animal hearts was not tested following treatment with rapamycin.[20, 22] Inactivation of cardiac mTOR was also associated with marked elevation of apoptosis and declines in myocardial function and accelerated progression to HF.[21] This could be rescued by deletion of a direct target of mTOR, 4E-BP1, although without notable changes in autophagy, suggesting that this process may not be a major contributor to the development of HF in these animals; rather, inhibition of protein synthesis may be the primary mechanism. In accordance, cardiomyocyte-specific inactivation of Raptor, a component of the mTOR complex 1, induces dilated C and high mortality within 6 weeks, with increases in apoptosis and autophagy. This evidence demonstrates a specific role of mTOR in preserving cardiac function.[19] An emerging concept of an optimal, ‘adaptive zone' of autophagic activation suggests an explanation of all this seemingly conflicting evidence. According to this concept, too much or too little autophagy may lead to increased hypertrophy and heart dysfunction. Supporting this, the conditional loss of function of Atg5 in adult mice led to rapid progression to hypertrophy and cardiac dysfunction in the absence of pressure overload.[23] It may seem counterintuitive that blocking a catabolic pathway inhibits cardiac growth. However, cardiac myocytes are not quiescent structures; their components, including sarcomeres and mitochondria, are highly dynamic and constantly turning over. Indeed, the phenomenon of activation of both anabolic and catabolic processes during development of CH was observed long ago. However, the specific role of autophagy as a part of the catabolic process in CH has only recently started to surface. One day, it may emerge as a target for CH and HF therapy.

Translational Implications in Cardiac Autophagy

Modulation of the autophagic pathway may represent a future therapeutic target in heart disease. However, the complex nature of autophagic mechanisms and the lack of autophagy-specific inducing and blocking agents all contribute to limiting its therapeutic application. Agents such as metformin and rapamycin, an AMPK activator and mTOR inhibitor, respectively, have been tested in clinical settings for purposes other than autophagy. Metformin is used commonly in patients with diabetes, and its use diminishes all-cause mortality and MI.[24] More recently, animal models of ischemia and I/R have reported beneficial effects of metformin by decreasing infarct size and blunting HF.[25] Other medications used in MI, such as β-blockers (e.g., propranolol) and calcium channel blockers (e.g., verapamil), were examined more than 20 years ago.[26, 27] These studies found that the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol inhibited autophagy;[27] and propranolol and verapamil had the opposite effect.[26] These actions, however, were rather short lived, lasting only 10 min.[26, 27] The long-term impact on autophagy of β-blockers and calcium channel antagonists are unknown and potentially clinically relevant, as patients typically use them chronically to control blood pressure and symptoms from ischemic heart disease. On the other hand, the α1-adrenergic receptor agonist phenylephrine increases cardiac myocyte autophagy.[17] Autophagy can be activated by caloric restriction.[28] In animal models, caloric restriction attenuates age-related changes in the heart, including hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, shifts in myosin isoform composition, histological changes, apoptosis, and the deterioration of chronotropic and inotropic responses to adrenergic stimulation.[28] In humans, echocardiographic studies have shown that caloric restriction improves diastolic function in healthy nonobese humans in conjunction with reductions in indices of myocardial stiffness.[28] It is apparent that more research is needed before any conclusion can be drawn regarding the exact role autophagy has in ischemia and I/R, so that agents specifically designed as autophagy inducers or inhibitors can be considered clinically. Recent work has provided insight into how autophagy contributes to CH. Evidence supports the notion that activation of autophagy is required for both myocyte growth and to maintain homeostasis in an enlarged, hypertrophied myocyte. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors suppress the maladaptive autophagic response, contributing to their anti-hypertrophic effects and leading to improved cardiac function.[17] Indeed, increased autophagic activity may be a universal feature of C, including chemotherapy-induced C and HF. The clinical relevance of HDAC inhibitors and autophagy in the heart is potentially significant, as these agents are currently used in patients as cancer chemotherapy. Conceivably, they are in a unique position to kill cancer cells and protect the heart at the same time. In summary, the role of autophagy is intricate, and its contribution to heart disease is complex. Many aspects are still debated and actively investigated. However, maintenance of a balance of autophagy is critical, not too much and not too little (Figure 3).
Figure 3

The Goldilocks rule of autophagy in heart disease. Autophagy is a dynamic process. The relationship between autophagy and heart disease is complex. Although basal autophagy is critical to maintain cellular and whole-body homeostasis, both increases and decreases in autophagy to excessive degree can be maladaptive. In CH, HF, and I/R, autophagic flux is abnormally elevated, contributing to cardiac dysfunction. With aging, Pompe disease, and Danon disease, autophagic activity and processing are attenuated, perturbing cellular homeostasis and contributing to cardiac disease. Animal models have been studied extensively to evaluate the role of autophagy in heart disease with either increases (Beclin 1 tg) or decreases (Atg5 KO, Beclin 1 het) in autophagic activity

Apoptosis

Apoptosis is mediated by two pathways, the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathways, and both have been described in cardiac myocytes.[1] The extrinsic apoptotic pathway can be triggered by FAS ligand, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, or TRAIL. Both FAS and TNF receptor I are expressed in cardiac myocytes and have been implicated in cardiovascular pathology.[1] TRAIL has also been reported to be released by cardiac myocytes,[29] but no further information is available about TRAIL and the heart. Cardiac myocyte-specific overexpression of TNF-α in transgenic mice provoked dilated C and HF,[30] suggesting that activation of the death receptor pathway by TNF-α is harmful to the heart (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Apoptotic pathway in cardiac myocytes. In the extrinsic pathway, death receptor activation by a death ligand induces death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) formation and casp 8 activation, which in turn activates casp 3. This pathway can also activate the intrinsic pathway by the proteolysis of BID to t-BID by casp 8 and interaction of t-BID with BAX in the mitochondria. Pro-apoptotic BAX/BAK induces cyto c, Smac/DIABLO, AIF, and Endo G release from the mitochondria. Cyto c with Apaf1 and casp 9 form the apoptosome with activation of casp 9. Casp activity is regulated by the endogenous casp inhibitor XIAP. Cardiac myocytes are naturally resistant to apoptosis due to their low-level expression of Apaf1 and casps and high levels of XIAP

The mitochondrion is the primary organelle involved in mediating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. In cardiac myocytes, mitochondria are located at intermyofibrillar spaces and underneath the sarcolemma. This strategic distribution of mitochondria allows for efficient ATP supply to the high-energy demand, continuously contracting cardiac myocyte. However, because mitochondria can also contribute to cell death in response to multiple stresses, cardiac myocytes have developed special strategies to achieve strict control over the intrinsic apoptotic pathway.[1, 31] Cardiac myocytes express various members of the BCL2 family, several of which are transcriptionally regulated in heart disease, including anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic BCL2 proteins.[32] Cardiac myocytes express low levels of Apaf1, and a consequence of this low Apaf1 activity is the engagement of strict control of caspase (casp) activation by endogenous XIAP.[33] In fact, direct microinjection of cytochrome c (cyto c) into cardiac myocytes was not sufficient to induce apoptosis.[33] This observation is consistent with studies showing substantial translocation of cyto c into the cytosol, without much detectable apoptosis in human cardiomyopathic hearts.[34] Downregulation of XIAP and cIAP1/2 in cardiac myocytes within the failing myocardium has been suggested to contribute to increased cardiac myocyte apoptosis.[34] Transgenic mice overexpressing cIAP2 had reduced infarct size and fewer TUNEL-positive cells after I/R.[35] IAPs can also be inhibited by SMAC/DIABLO and OMI/HTRA2, and inhibition of OMI/HTRA2 reduced apoptosis and infarct size in rat after I/R.[36]

Mitochondria in Cardiac Myocyte Apoptosis

It has been suggested that activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway leading to executioner casp activation is relevant in heart injury.[1] The notion of participation of casp activation in adult cardiac myocyte apoptosis emerged from studies using immunofluorescence microscopy[16] and casp inhibitors.[37] Bahi et al.[38] demonstrated that cardiomyocyte levels of all casps decrease with age, and they are very low in adult cardiac cells. Recently, Bae et al.[39] reported that apoptosis can be induced in the heart lacking casp activation via casp-independent pathways, probably through apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). Both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways can be inhibited by the cytoprotective protein apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain (ARC). ARC inhibits the extrinsic pathway by interacting with casp 8 and components of the death-inducing signaling complex, such as FADD, whereas inhibition of the intrinsic pathway is mediated by blocking BAX activation and mitochondria translocation.[40] AIF is anchored by its N terminus to the mitochondrial inner membrane, with its C terminus oriented toward the intermembrane space. AIF is required for oxidative phosphorylation and for the assembly and/or stabilization of respiratory complex I.[41] Upon induction of apoptosis, AIF is cleaved and released into the cytosol, where it translocates to the nucleus and mediates chromatin condensation and large-scale DNA fragmentation.[41] However, this well-known pro-apoptotic action of AIF is in conflict with the observation that AIF is essential for the maintenance of normal heart function and its inactivation results in dilated C.[42] Moreover, cardiac myocytes isolated from a mouse model with 80% reduction in AIF levels manifested increased cell death induced by oxidative stress, and the hearts of these mice displayed enhanced ischemic damage after in vivo I/R.[43] Although it has been described that AIF is released from cardiac myocyte mitochondria during I/R, its contribution to I/R-induced apoptosis was discounted.[38] However, AIF has been implicated in cardiac myocyte death induced by oxidative stress and HF.[44] Endonuclease G (Endo G) is a nuclear-encoded endonuclease localized to the intermembrane space of mitochondria. In cardiac myocyte apoptosis, Endo G translocates to the nucleus, where it cleaves DNA. In heart and cultured cardiac myocytes, Endo G has a role in I/R-mediated cell death.[38] Activation of the intrinsic pathway by the extrinsic apoptotic pathway can take place through casp-8-dependent cleavage of BCL2-interacting protein (BID) to truncated BID (t-BID). The C-terminal fragment of t-BID subsequently translocates to the mitochondrial outer membrane, where it presumably activates the intrinsic pathway. This pathway is operative in the heart.[1]

Mitochondrial Dynamics and Apoptosis

Mitochondria exist as a complex, interconnected, and highly dynamic network characterized by the ongoing and counterbalanced events of mitochondrial fusion and fission.[45] Mitochondrial fission is regulated by DRP-1 and FIS1, whereas mitochondrial fusion is controlled by mitofusins 1/2 (MFN1/2) and OPA1.[45] Changes in the mitochondrial morphology of cardiac myocytes have been reported in several heart diseases.[46] Fragmentation of the mitochondrial network in response to apoptotic stimuli is a frequent finding observed in cardiac myocytes.[47] Loss of integrity of the mitochondrial membrane is mediated by a complex process that involves DRP-1, MFN2, and the pro-apoptotic protein BAX.[45, 46] Decreases in the abundance of MFN2 is associated with an increase in mitochondrial fragmentation and cyto c release, pointing to a protective role of MFN2 against apoptotic death.[47] Recently, emerging evidence suggests that the unfolded protein response (UPR) has important roles in pressure overload-triggered HF.[48] UPR markers, including GRP78, calreticulin and GRP94, are significantly upregulated in mouse heart in the setting of pressure overload.[48] Angiotensin II administration can induce ER stress and apoptosis in cultured cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, CHOP activation in pressure overload contributes to CH and HF.[49] Fu et al.[49] showed that CHOP-deficient animals manifested less CH, fibrosis, and cardiac dysfunction in the setting of pressure overload. These studies highlight the critical role of ER stress in CH and HF.

Apoptosis in HF

Apoptosis is rare in normal human myocardium, with a reported prevalence of approximately one TUNEL-positive cardiac myocyte per 10 000–100 000, that is, 0.01–0.001%. In human failing hearts of New York Heart Association class III–IV, apoptotic cells are detectable in the range of 0.12–0.70%.[50] In all reported cases, apoptosis levels were substantially lower than 1%. Because the limited ability of cardiac myocytes to proliferate, low levels of apoptosis can still have profound effects. Mani[51] has postulated that an apoptotic rate of 0.1% would be expected to result in a ∼37% loss in cardiac myocyte number over a year. This issue was addressed by generating transgenic mice with cardiac myocyte-specific expression of an inducible casp 8.[52] These transgenic mice developed severe, dilated C over 8 weeks and died within 2–6 months, manifesting disease progression that was markedly accelerated as compared with healthy wild-type mice that exhibited apoptotic rates of ∼0.002%.[52] This finding suggests that a very low, albeit elevated, rate of apoptosis can be an important component of HF pathogenesis.

Apoptosis in MI and I/R

Because of the intrinsically low levels of Apaf1 and casps in cardiac myocytes, nonmyocyte cells within the heart may be more susceptible to apoptosis. This, in turns, complicates the study of cardiac myocyte apoptosis in whole heart. Permanent coronary occlusion induced maximum cardiac myocyte apoptosis at 4.5 h, whereas necrosis peaked at 24 h.[53] Reperfusion appeared to accelerate the timing of apoptosis as compared with permanent occlusion.[54] Mice that lack FAS (lpr mice) exhibited a decrease in cardiac myocyte apoptosis in models of doxorubicin toxicity,[55] as well as marked reductions in infarct size following I/R.[56] However, deletion of either TNFR1 or TNFR2 does not affect infarct size. In contrast, deletion of both together resulted in significantly larger infarcts following permanent coronary occlusion.[57] These results suggest that FAS, and not TNFR, is the major mechanism for activating the extrinsic apoptotic pathway during MI. Cardiac myocyte-specific overexpression of BCL2 substantially reduces infarct size, cardiac myocyte apoptosis, and cardiac dysfunction following I/R.[58] BAX deficiency reduces infarct size and cardiac dysfunction following I/R and following MI in mice.[59] Targeted deletion of PUMA reduced infarct size ∼50% in an ex vivo Langendorff I/R model.[60] Together, these results suggest that the intrinsic apoptosis pathway also has a central role in MI.

Translational Implications of Cardiac Apoptosis

To date, no clinical trial has been attempted to specifically block or inhibit apoptotic pathways during MI. However, in chronic HF, clinical trials have been carried out using compounds that deplete circulating TNF-α.[61] Etanercept is a recombinant human-soluble TNF receptor that binds to and neutralizes circulating TNF-α.[61] Despite encouraging results in small pilot trials,[61, 62] large multicenter trials of etanercept in moderate-to-severe HF did not demonstrate significant clinical benefit and even suggested that etanercept may adversely affect the course of the disease.[61, 63] Infliximab is a recombinant human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to and neutralizes TNF-α.[64] Infliximab improved left ventricular function and limited HF in TNF-α overexpressing transgenic mice.[64] However, the ATTACH trial did not detect HF improvement, but rather uncovered a signal for adverse events in patients with moderate to severe HF.[61, 65] These disappointing results might be explained by the dual action of TNF-α: short-term beneficial but long-term harmful effects. More encouraging results have been obtained with pentoxifylline, a xanthine-derived compound that directly modulates TNF-α mRNA expression,[66] (as opposed to neutralizing circulating TNF-α). A single-center, placebo-controlled trial of pentoxifylline reported improvement in left ventricular performance in idiopathic dilated C.[67] A large multicenter trial is warranted.

Necrosis

Necrosis is marked by distinct morphological changes, including cell swelling, plasma membrane damage, loss of ATP, and organelle swelling. Disruption of cell integrity and release of cellular contents trigger a secondary inflammatory response, with potential pathological consequences.[1] Necrosis is mainly caused by physical or chemical trauma to the cell and has long been considered as passive and accidental cell death.[68] Recently, however, emerging evidence suggests that a proportion of necrosis is regulated by serial signaling events in a controlled and orchestrated manner. Several terms have been introduced to describe this form of necrosis, such as programmed necrosis, casp-independent cell death, and necroptosis.[69] A number of mechanisms has been proposed to explain the initiation and execution of necrosis, including death receptors, ROS, Ca2+, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening (Figure 5).[68, 70]
Figure 5

Necrosis pathways in cardiac myocytes. During certain cardiac pathologies, such as I/R, the action of cellular pumps is inhibited by ATP depletion, there is a consequent increase in H+ and Na+, and the sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) operates in reverse manner. Increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ leads to increased Ca2+ in the mitochondrial matrix along with elevated levels of ROS, culminating in MPTP opening, and necrosis. On the other hand, mitochondrial swelling and mitochondrial membrane rupture also produce necrosis. Moreover, increased H+ in the cytoplasm and inactivation of H+ pumps elicit declines in lysosomal pH, which results in overactivation of proteases such as cathepsins. The massive entry of water results in lysosomal swelling, membrane rupture, and release of proteases into the cytoplasm, which together with other activated proteases, such as calpains, digest different substrates, including cytoskeletal proteins, contributing to necrosis. Activation of death receptors, such as the TNF-α receptor, represents other necrosis pathways in cardiac myocytes under certain conditions such as HF. The activation of these receptors could lead to the activation of receptor-interacting protein (RIP), increased ROS, and necrosis. The massive inflow of water into the cell by the osmotic imbalance ultimately leads to cell swelling and rupture of the plasma membrane

Necrosis in HF

A characteristic feature of HF is progressive dropout of cardiac myocytes and development of cardiac dysfunction. As noted above, early studies suggested that apoptosis serves as one critical factor contributing to cell demise in end-stage HF. However, later observations suggested that necrosis is more prominent in failing human heart, contributing several fold more to disease pathogenesis than apoptosis in both men and women.[71] Mechanistically, sustained Ca2+ stress, together with persistent activation of adrenergic receptors, triggers necrotic cell death. Using inducible overexpression of the L-type Ca2+ channel (LTCC) specifically in cardiac myocytes, Nakayama et al.[72] found that an increase of LTCC activity promoted progressive cell death, and coadministration of an adrenergic receptor agonist amplified this process. Importantly, cardiac myocytes were protected from cell death when cyclophilin D is absent, suggesting the MPTP and necrosis are involved.[73, 74] In contrast, forced expression of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2 did not rescue cell death by Ca2+ overloading. These data suggest strongly that necrosis contributes to the progression of HF, and that Ca2+ handling and MPTP opening may be critically involved.

Necrosis in MI

During MI, activation of anaerobic glycolysis to provide ATP leads to accumulation of H+ and acidosis. Ion pumps on the plasma membrane respond to remove excess H+ in exchange of Na+. In response to elevated levels of intracellular Na+, the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger operating in reverse mode is less capable of removing intracellular Ca2+, culminating in increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels. The mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter then transports Ca2+ into mitochondria. Increases in Ca2+ within this organelle induces Ca2+-dependent dehydrogenase activation, declines in NADH and electron flux through the electron transport chain, increased ROS, and decreases in ATP levels. As Ca2+ uptake into mitochondria dissipates mitochondrial membrane potential, eventually the increase in matrix Ca2+ reaches a plateau under hypoxic conditions due to limitation of the proton gradient. Upon reperfusion, however, restoration of oxygen and ATP-generating capabilities quickly recovers ATP levels and mitochondrial membrane potential. These changes regenerate the required ion gradient for more Ca2+ entry into mitochondria, which causes long-lasting opening of MPTP regulated by cyclophilin D, and mitochondrial swelling leads ultimately to cellular necrosis.[1] Some evidence implicates MPTP opening as a mechanistic link between myocyte necrosis and I/R injury. Involvement of MPTP in cardiac I/R responses was elegantly illustrated by the Molkentin and Tsujimoto groups.[73, 74] Using similar genetic approaches, they found that lack of cyclophilin D protected cardiac myocytes from Ca2+ overload-induced cell death in vitro. Infarct size and lactate release from the heart were dramatically reduced in the mutant animals after I/R. Interestingly, pro-apoptotic protein-induced cyto c release did not differ between wild-type and knockout mitochondria, suggesting that cyclophilin D does not have a critical role in apoptosis.

Translational Implications of Necrosis

Promising work on MPTP opening from in vitro tissue culture and in vivo animal studies has provided hints regarding therapeutic targets to protect the heart from necrosis. Cyclosporin is a potent inhibitor of MPTP. A pilot clinical trial by Piot et al.[75] found that acute treatment with cyclosporin upon reperfusion at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with reduced infarct size and reduced creatine kinase and troponin I release. Although these results are encouraging and suggest that inhibition of MPTP is key in the protection against necrotic death during I/R, additional experimental work is needed to determine the contribution of other targets of cyclosporin, such as calcineurin or nitric oxide synthase (NOS), in this cardioprotection. Necrostatin-1 is a selective inhibitor of necroptosis, a specialized pathway of programmed necrosis, targeting the kinase RIP1.[76] In vitro studies using cancer cell lines reported protective effects of necrostatin-1 in TNF-α induced necrosis. More recently, the role of necrostatin-1 in cardiac I/R has been evaluated.[76] A bolus dose of necrostatin-1 in wild-type mice at the time of coronary reperfusion dramatically reduced infarct size after I/R injury, whereas no protection was found in cyclophilin D-deficient animals. Necrostatin-1 may hold promise for consideration of clinical use.

Stem Cell Therapy for HF

MI and HF are associated with significant loss of cardiac myocytes, a process that has been thought to be irreversible. However, the discovery of tissue resident cardiac stem cells and the ability of exogenously delivered bone marrow (BM)-derived stem cells to confer benefit have recently challenged this long held belief.[77] These discoveries have stimulated basic and clinical research, with the aim of employing the regenerative properties of stem cells to repair damaged myocardium, improve cardiac function, and improve patient morbidity and mortality.[77] Skeletal muscle cells have been considered as an alternative cell source for transplantation to improve cardiac function in animal models, which indeed succeeded. However, subsequent clinical trials revealed a significant signal for arrhythmic harm.[78] Other types of cells, such as cultured cardiac stem cells, embryonic stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells, have also been considered as cellular sources for generating cardiac myocytes.[79] Early reports showing that BM-derived adult stem/progenitor cells manifest greater plasticity than expected and can differentiate into cardiac myocytes raised the hope that BM-derived stem cells may improve both neovascularization and repair of the infarcted heart. Although there have been several basic research and numerous clinical studies showing that different subpopulations of BM-derived stem cells and other progenitor cells are capable of enhancing heart function, the signaling pathways involved and the extent to which progenitor cells are able to reestablish cardiac function in stage IV HF is extensively debated.[77, 79]

Conclusions and Perspectives

Autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis are major mechanisms in the pathogenesis of CVD. A summary of interventions showing the relevance of autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis in cardiac myocyte cell death and/or heart diseases is depicted in Table 1. One day, clinical therapy targeting myocyte cell death is envisioned. Even though some translational applications have been tested already, manipulation of cardiac myocyte death is in its infancy. Currently, 55 patent applications related to the control of cardiac myocyte death/survival (5 in necrosis, 29 in apoptosis, 11 in apoptosis and/or necrosis, and 10 in autophagy) and its application to treatment of CVDs have been filed (Table 2). However, none of these products has emerged with success in clinical trials. Major translational challenges remain in this exciting area, but patients with heart disease are likely to benefit from these efforts.
Table 1

Autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis interventions

TypeInterventionModelEffectReference
AutophagyDominant-negative AMPKTransgenic mouseAttenuated autophagic response to ischemia with larger MI and worse cardiac functionRussell et al.[9]
 Activation of AMPK with metforminRatReduction of HF induced by MIBuss et al.[13]; Yin et al.[25]
 STAT1 deficiencyTransgenic mouseEnhanced autophagy that protects upon reperfusionMcCormick et al.[14]
 Atg5 knockoutTransgenic mouseRapid progression to hypertrophy and cardiac dysfunction with pressure overloadNakai et al.[23]
 Beclin 1 heterozygous disruptionTransgenic mouseDecreased heart hypertrophy to pressure overloadZhu et al.[18]
 Beclin 1 overexpressionTransgenic mouseExacerbated heart hypertrophy to pressure overloadZhu et al.[18]
 Propranolol (β-blocker) and verapamil (calcium channel blocker)RatInduction of autophagyBahro and Pfeifer[26]
 Isoproterenol (β-adrenergic agonist)RatInhibition of autophagyPfeifer et al.[27]
 Phenylephrine (α1-adrenergic agonist)Cultured rat cardiomyocytesInduction of autophagyCao et al.[17]
 Histone deacetylaseCultured rat cardiomyocytesSuppression of maladaptive autophagic responseCao et al.[17]
     
ApoptosisOverexpression of cIAP2Transgenic mouseReduced infarct size and TUNEL-positive cells after I/RChua et al.[35]
 Inhibition of OMI/HTRA2RatReduction of apoptosis and infarct size after I/RBhuiyan and Fukunaga[36]
 Caspase inhibition with YVAD-cmkRatReduced infarct size and TUNEL-positive cells after I/RHolly et al.[37]
 Doxorubicin treatment of caspase inhibitor CrmA in overexpressing miceTransgenic mouseInduction of apoptosis in hearts lacking caspase activation via caspase-independent pathways, probably by AIFBae et al.[39]
 Cardiac-specific expression of inducible caspase 8Transgenic mousePresence of 0.023% of apoptosis, with development of severe dilated cardiomyopathy over 8 weeks and death after 2–6 monthsWencker et al.[52]
 FAS knockoutTransgenic mouseDecreased apoptosis upon doxorubicin treatment and reduction of infarct size following I/RNakamura et al.[55]; Lee et al.[56]
 Cardiac-specific overexpression of BCL2Transgenic mouseReduction of infarct size, apoptosis and cardiac dysfunction after I/RChen et al.[58]
 BAX knockoutTransgenic mouseReduction of infarct size and cardiac dysfunction following I/R and MIHochhauser et al.[80]
 PUMA knockoutTransgenic mouseReduction of infarct size in an ex vivo Langendorff I/R modelToth et al.[60]
 Etanercept, a recombinant human-soluble TNF receptorClinical trialsNonsignificant clinical benefitsBalakumar and Singh[61]; Mann et al.[63]
 Infliximab, a recombinant chimeric TNF-α-neutralizing monoclonal antibodyClinical trialsNon-HF improvement and increased adverse effects in patients with moderate-to-severe HFKadokami et al.[64]
     
NecrosisCyclophilin D knockoutTransgenic mouseResistance to necrotic cell death induced by reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ overload and a high level of resistance to I/R-induced cardiac injuryBaines et al.[73]; Nakagawa et al.[74]
 Acute treatment with cyclosporin A, a MPTP inhibitor, during percutaneous coronary angioplastyClinical trialsReduction of infarct size and reduced creatine kinase and troponin I releasePiot et al.[75]
 Necrostatin-1MouseReduction of infarct size after I/RLim et al.[76]

Abbreviations: HF, heart failure; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; MI, myocardial infarct

Table 2

Patent applications related to autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

TypePatent categoryTherapeutic/TargetRemarksPatent number
NecrosisNecrosis inhibitor4-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-2-(hexahydro-1-methyl-1H-azepin-4-yl)-1(2 h)-phthalazinoneMISJP63218622
 Necrosis inhibitorPotassium channel activator, such as pinacidil or cromakalimI/REP0351767
 Necrosis inhibitor1,4-Benzoxazine derivative such as Na+/H+ exchange inhibitorMIS, cardiac dysfunction, myocardial necrosis, arrhythmia, RI, MIUS5597820
 Necrosis inhibitorBenzo[1,4]thiazine derivatives such as Na+/H+ exchange system inhibitorMIS, MI, angina pectorisWO9813357
 Necrosis inhibitorBenzothiophen-2-carbonylguanidine derivativesI/RUS2010004466
     
Necrosis and apoptosisTNF-α inhibitor/antagonistHuman recombinant antibodies anti TNF-αMISWO9729131
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistSoluble TNF receptorHFWO0059530
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistInhibition of TNF-α expression with adenosineCHFUS6221851
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistInhibition of TNF-α expression with phosphodiesterase type IV inhibitorsCHFEP0995439
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistSoluble TNF-α receptorCHFWO02080847
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistAnti-TNF-α antibodiesHeart pathologies underlying excess TNF-αUS2003180299
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistAnti-TNFR1 polypeptides based on antibody single-variable domainsHeart necrosisWO2010081787
 TNF-α inhibitor/antagonistBicyclosulfonyl acid compoundsCHF, I/RUS2010311741
 FAS inhibitor/antagonistAntibody against human FASMI, MIS, I/RUS2010233157
 PARP inhibitor3,6-Substituted 5-arylamino-1H-pyridine-2-one derivativesMIS, diabetic myocardial diseaseUS2007281948
 PARP inhibitorTruncated PPAR inhibitorHFWO2009043953
     
ApoptosisCaspase inhibitorNicotinyl aspartyl ketones derivatives such as caspase-3-inhibiting compoundsI/RWO0127085
 Caspase inhibitorIsoxazoline derivativesMISUS6747050
 Caspase inhibitorSubstituted α-hydroxy acid such as potent inhibitors of caspases and apoptotic cell deathMI, I/R, CHF, CWO0116093
 Caspase inhibitorProtein inhibitor of caspase 3MIS, conduction disturbance, chronic heart diseasesJP2002355077
 Caspase inhibitorInhibitor of caspase 3 or caspase-activated desoxyribonuclease inhibitorHFUS2003130216
 Caspase inhibitor2-Aminobenzamide derivativesMI, CHF, CUS2003181388
 Caspase inhibitorDipeptide derivativesMI, CHF, CUS2003181391
 Caspase inhibitorDipeptide derivativesMI, CHF, HF, CUS2004116355
 Caspase inhibitorSubstituted piperidine, tetrahydroquinoline, or tetrahydroisoquinolineMIS, MI, CHF, ATH, coronary artery bypass graftWO0190070
 Caspase inhibitorAntisense for MIAP1, MIAP2, MIAP3, CIAP1, CIAP2, XIAP, APAF1, RAIDD, and Diablo/SMACCardiac disordersUS2004254136
 Caspase inhibitorCell wall of Chlorella pyrenoidosaMISJP2005089324
 Caspase inhibitorPyridazinone derivativesMISWO2008016239
 Caspase inhibitorDanshensu derivativesMISCN101607904
 Caspase inhibitorPeptide derivativesMISUS2010184703
 Caspase inhibitorInhibition of OMI/HTRA2HF, MIUS2010311772
 Caspase inhibitorIsoxazoline derivativeMISWO2006090997
 Intervention of Bcl2-related proteinsModified Bcl-xLMI, I/RWO2004110471
 Intervention of Bcl2-related proteinsAntisense oligonucleotide against BNIP3Hypoxia-acidosis-associated cardiac cell deathWO2004009780
 Apoptosis inhibitor2-Substituted-4H-1,3-benzothiazine-4-one compoundsHeart diseasesUS2003186971
 Apoptosis inhibitorExtracts of Radix salviae miltiorrhizae and Rhizoma cnidiiTo inhibit apoptotic cardiac cell deathKR20040000651
 Apoptosis inhibitor3-[4-(4-Chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridineMIS, CEP1815866
 Apoptosis inhibitorHuman FAF1 protein inhibitorMIS, HF, diabetic CVD, HKR100818752
 Apoptosis inhibitorAminothiophene derivativesMIS, diabetic CVD, HF, HWO2008140214
 Apoptosis inhibitorRecombinant human ARC proteinC, MI, HFCN101307320
 Apoptosis inhibitor1,3-BenzothiazinoneHeart diseaseUS2009082343
 Apoptosis inhibitorTetrahydroisoquinolinesMI, MISUS2009306130
 Apoptosis inhibitorDeletion or silencing of midkineI/RUS2010056437
 Apoptosis inhibitorExtracts of Gramineae plantMISUS2010068315
 Apoptosis inhibitorCorynantheine, the alkaloid extract from UncariaMISWO2010043109
     
AutophagyAutophagy induction8-Methylchroman-7-ol derivativesATH, MISUS2010173983
 Proteinopathy treatmentFarnesyl transferase inhibitorMI, MIS, vascular hyperplasia, H, CHF, restenosis, ATH, HT, angina pectoris,US2010160372
 Autophagy regulationCell permeable Tat-Atg5K130R (inhibitor of autophagy) and Tat-Beclin l (activator of autophagy)HF, I/RWO 2011106684
 Autophagy regulationCompounds that regulates ATG14L and rubicon, which binds class III PI3K/Vps34–Beclin 1 complexInflammatory cardiac diseasesWO2010030936
 Autophagy inductionGlycosylated anti-tumor ether lipids are small molecules that induce and/or enhance autophagy in cellsI/RWO2009092170
 Autophagy regulationAutophagy modulators identified by a high-throughput phenotypic screenMIS, I/RWO2008122038
 Cardiac autophagy death regulationsiRNA against ANT isoforms, which selectively regulates autophagic cell deathMISUS20060210535
 Autophagy regulationA phosphorus-rapamycin analog, AP23573Restenosis, ATH, CVD, cerebral vascular disease, peripheral vascular diseaseUS20040073024
 Anti-cardiac autophagic degeneration/deathLong-term administration of a colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)MIS, F, LVRUS2006051318
 Cardiac atrophyAgent that increases the expression of the runx1 gene to prevent or decrease cardiac autophagyTreatment of a heart condition whereby heart muscle is destroyedUS2006003959

Abbreviations: ATH, atherosclerosis; C, cardiomyopathy; CHF, congestive heart failure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; F, myocardial fibrosis; HF, heart failure; HT, hypertension; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; LVR, left ventricular remodeling; MI, myocardial infarction; MIS, myocardial ischemia; RI, reperfusion injury

  81 in total

1.  Dilated cardiomyopathy in transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Authors:  T Kubota; C F McTiernan; C S Frye; S E Slawson; B H Lemster; A P Koretsky; A J Demetris; A M Feldman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Short-term inhibition of cardiac cellular autophagy by isoproterenol.

Authors:  U Pfeifer; J Föhr; W Wilhelm; J Dämmrich
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.000

3.  Apoptosis in ischemic and reperfused rat myocardium.

Authors:  H Fliss; D Gattinger
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) trial: first randomized placebo-controlled study of myoblast transplantation.

Authors:  Philippe Menasché; Ottavio Alfieri; Stefan Janssens; William McKenna; Hermann Reichenspurner; Ludovic Trinquart; Jean-Thomas Vilquin; Jean-Pierre Marolleau; Barbara Seymour; Jérôme Larghero; Stephen Lake; Gilles Chatellier; Scott Solomon; Michel Desnos; Albert A Hagège
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  AMP-activated protein kinase mediates ischemic glucose uptake and prevents postischemic cardiac dysfunction, apoptosis, and injury.

Authors:  Raymond R Russell; Ji Li; David L Coven; Marc Pypaert; Christoph Zechner; Monica Palmeri; Frank J Giordano; James Mu; Morris J Birnbaum; Lawrence H Young
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Pharmacological modulation of myocardial tumor necrosis factor alpha production by phosphodiesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  M R Bergman; B J Holycross
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Changes in mitochondrial dynamics during ceramide-induced cardiomyocyte early apoptosis.

Authors:  Valentina Parra; Veronica Eisner; Mario Chiong; Alfredo Criollo; Francisco Moraga; Alejandra Garcia; Steffen Härtel; Enrique Jaimovich; Antonio Zorzano; Cecilia Hidalgo; Sergio Lavandero
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Short-term stimulation by propranolol and verapamil of cardiac cellular autophagy.

Authors:  M Bahro; U Pfeifer
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.000

9.  Apoptotic and necrotic myocyte cell deaths are independent contributing variables of infarct size in rats.

Authors:  J Kajstura; W Cheng; K Reiss; W A Clark; E H Sonnenblick; S Krajewski; J C Reed; G Olivetti; P Anversa
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 10.  Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease.

Authors:  Beth Levine; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  157 in total

1.  Cardiac cell culture model as a left ventricle mimic for cardiac tissue generation.

Authors:  Mai-Dung Nguyen; Joseph P Tinney; Fangping Yuan; Thomas J Roussel; Ayman El-Baz; Guruprasad Giridharan; Bradley B Keller; Palaniappan Sethu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Severe Pneumococcal Pneumonia Causes Acute Cardiac Toxicity and Subsequent Cardiac Remodeling.

Authors:  Luis F Reyes; Marcos I Restrepo; Cecilia A Hinojosa; Nilam J Soni; Antonio Anzueto; Bettina L Babu; Norberto Gonzalez-Juarbe; Alejandro H Rodriguez; Alejandro Jimenez; James D Chalmers; Stefano Aliberti; Oriol Sibila; Vicki T Winter; Jacqueline J Coalson; Luis D Giavedoni; Charles S Dela Cruz; Grant W Waterer; Martin Witzenrath; Norbert Suttorp; Peter H Dube; Carlos J Orihuela
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Programmed Cell Death Genes Are Linked to Elevated Creatine Kinase Levels in Unhealthy Male Nonagenarians.

Authors:  Sangkyu Kim; Eric Simon; Leann Myers; L Lee Hamm; S Michal Jazwinski
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 4.  A multidimensional sight on cardiac failure: uncovered from structural to molecular level.

Authors:  Vijay Urmaliya; Gustavo Franchelli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  24 h nesfatin-1 treatment promotes apoptosis in cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Sandra Feijóo-Bandín; Diego Rodríguez-Penas; Vanessa García-Rúa; Ana Mosquera-Leal; Emad Abu-Assi; Manuel Portolés; Esther Roselló-Lletí; Miguel Rivera; Carlos Diéguez; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Francisca Lago
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  The Use of a Multidimensional Measure of Dialysis Adequacy-Moving beyond Small Solute Kinetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Laura M Dember; Joanne M Bargman; Teri Browne; David M Charytan; Jennifer E Flythe; LaTonya J Hickson; Adriana M Hung; Michel Jadoul; Timmy Chang Lee; Klemens B Meyer; Hamid Moradi; Tariq Shafi; Isaac Teitelbaum; Leslie P Wong; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection.

Authors:  Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.165

8.  Biomaterials functionalized with MSC secreted extracellular vesicles and soluble factors for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Meadhbh Á Brennan; Pierre Layrolle; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Myristate-derived d16:0 sphingolipids constitute a cardiac sphingolipid pool with distinct synthetic routes and functional properties.

Authors:  Sarah Brice Russo; Rotem Tidhar; Anthony H Futerman; L Ashley Cowart
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Mitochondria and mitophagy: the yin and yang of cell death control.

Authors:  Dieter A Kubli; Åsa B Gustafsson
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.