Susan W Muir1, Manuel Montero-Odasso. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Parkwood Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength, gait, and balance in older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, bibliographies of selected articles, and previous systematic reviews were searched between January 1980 and November 2010 for eligible articles. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (≥60) participating in randomized controlled trials of the effect of supplemental vitamin D without an exercise intervention on muscle strength, gait, and balance. MEASUREMENTS: Data were independently extracted, and study quality was evaluated. Meta-analysis using a fixed-effects model was performed and the I(2) statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 714 potentially relevant articles, 13 met the inclusion criteria. In the pooled analysis, vitamin D supplementation yielded a standardized mean difference of -0.20 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.39 to -0.01, P = .04, I(2) = 0%) for reduced postural sway, -0.19 (95% CI = -0.35 to -0.02, P = .03, I(2) = 0%) for decreased time to complete the Timed Up and Go Test, and 0.05 (95% CI = -0.11 to 0.20, P = .04, I(2) = 0%) for lower extremity strength gain. Regarding dosing frequency regimen, only one study demonstrated a beneficial effect on balance with a single large dose. All studies with daily doses of 800 IU or more demonstrated beneficial effects on balance and muscle strength. CONCLUSION: Supplemental vitamin D with daily doses of 800 to 1,000 IU consistently demonstrated beneficial effects on strength and balance. An effect on gait was not demonstrated, although further evaluation is recommended.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength, gait, and balance in older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, bibliographies of selected articles, and previous systematic reviews were searched between January 1980 and November 2010 for eligible articles. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (≥60) participating in randomized controlled trials of the effect of supplemental vitamin D without an exercise intervention on muscle strength, gait, and balance. MEASUREMENTS: Data were independently extracted, and study quality was evaluated. Meta-analysis using a fixed-effects model was performed and the I(2) statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 714 potentially relevant articles, 13 met the inclusion criteria. In the pooled analysis, vitamin D supplementation yielded a standardized mean difference of -0.20 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.39 to -0.01, P = .04, I(2) = 0%) for reduced postural sway, -0.19 (95% CI = -0.35 to -0.02, P = .03, I(2) = 0%) for decreased time to complete the Timed Up and Go Test, and 0.05 (95% CI = -0.11 to 0.20, P = .04, I(2) = 0%) for lower extremity strength gain. Regarding dosing frequency regimen, only one study demonstrated a beneficial effect on balance with a single large dose. All studies with daily doses of 800 IU or more demonstrated beneficial effects on balance and muscle strength. CONCLUSION: Supplemental vitamin D with daily doses of 800 to 1,000 IU consistently demonstrated beneficial effects on strength and balance. An effect on gait was not demonstrated, although further evaluation is recommended.
Authors: O Meyer; B Dawson-Hughes; E Sidelnikov; A Egli; D Grob; H B Staehelin; G Theiler; R W Kressig; H P Simmen; R Theiler; H A Bischoff-Ferrari Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Alexandra Papaioannou; Nancy Santesso; Suzanne N Morin; Sidney Feldman; Jonathan D Adachi; Richard Crilly; Lora M Giangregorio; Susan Jaglal; Robert G Josse; Sharon Kaasalainen; Paul Katz; Andrea Moser; Laura Pickard; Hope Weiler; Susan Whiting; Carly J Skidmore; Angela M Cheung Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: C Beaudart; V Rabenda; M Simmons; A Geerinck; I Araujo De Carvalho; J-Y Reginster; J Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; O Bruyère Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Matthew R Baldwin; M Cary Reid; Amanda A Westlake; John W Rowe; Evelyn C Granieri; Hannah Wunsch; Thuy-Tien Dam; Daniel Rabinowitz; Nathan E Goldstein; Mathew S Maurer; David J Lederer Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: E M Brouwer-Brolsma; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; R Bouillon; E J M Feskens; C J Gallagher; E Hypponen; D J Llewellyn; E Stoecklin; J Dierkes; A K Kies; F J Kok; C Lamberg-Allardt; U Moser; S Pilz; W H Saris; N M van Schoor; P Weber; R Witkamp; A Zittermann; L C P G M de Groot Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Samuel Amorim; Vitor Hugo Teixeira; Rui Corredeira; Maria Cunha; Bruno Maia; Paulo Margalho; Joana Pires Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 1.985