Literature DB >> 22187197

Comparison between accelerated and conventional dobutamine stress protocols for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Aurora Issa1, Andrea De Lorenzo, Bernardo Oliveira, Marcos Pellini, Ronaldo Lima.   

Abstract

The conventional dobutamine (Dob) stress protocol for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is long, with frequent adverse effects, and generally requires atropine injection to reach target heart rate. Atropine is usually administered at the end of the protocol, when adverse effects are more frequent. Earlier atropine injection may be useful to shorten the stress protocol and reduce adverse effects. We sought to compare a Dob stress protocol with early atropine injection to a conventional Dob stress protocol in the same patients undergoing MPS. 30 patients underwent Dob-MPS with a conventional protocol (steps of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mcg/kg/min at 3 min intervals, adding atropine to the maximal Dob dose if necessary to achieve 85% of the age-corrected maximal predicted heart rate) and with an accelerated protocol with early atropine injection (at the end of the first stage). We compared stress duration, maximal heart rate (HR), percentage of maximal predicted HR, rate-pressure product, ST changes, MPS scores and the incidence of adverse effects between the 2 protocols. The accelerated protocol was shorter than the conventional protocol (7.1 ± 3.4 min vs. 11.8 ± 1.3 min; P < 0.0001), had the same efficacy to achieve hemodynamic parameters, without increasing adverse effects. The summed stress scores obtained by automatic analysis were similar in both protocols (6.3 ± 6.3 vs. 6.8 ± 6.3; P = NS) as well as the summed difference scores (2.5 ± 3.6 vs. 2.7 ± 3.4; P = NS). Early atropine injection during dobutamine stress protocol shortens stress duration. Our results suggest that patient safety and accuracy of MPS are unaltered, when compared to the conventional protocol, but further, larger studies are still necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22187197     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-0002-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  9 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Daniel S Berman; Elias H Botvinick; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; Regina S Druz; Edward P Ficaro; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Guido Germano; Gary V Heller; Milena J Henzlova; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Robert A Quaife; Terrence D Ruddy; Senthil N Sundaram; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Comparison of safety and efficacy of the early injection of atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography with the conventional protocol.

Authors:  Jeane M Tsutsui; Altamiro F F Osório; F Abio C Lario; Daniela R A Fernandes; Gustavo Sodre; José L Andrade; José A F Ramires; Wilson Mathias
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  M L Geleijnse; A Elhendy; P M Fioretti; J R Roelandt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Effects of dobutamine stress on myocardial blood flow, 99mTc sestamibi uptake, and systolic wall thickening in the presence of coronary artery stenoses: implications for dobutamine stress testing.

Authors:  D A Calnon; D K Glover; G A Beller; G Vanzetto; W H Smith; D D Watson; M Ruiz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Dobutamine thallium-201 tomography for evaluating patients with suspected coronary artery disease unable to undergo exercise or vasodilator pharmacologic stress testing.

Authors:  J T Hays; J J Mahmarian; A J Cochran; M S Verani
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Reduced adverse effects with an accelerated dobutamine stress protocol compared with the conventional protocol: a prospective, randomized myocardial perfusion scintigraphy study.

Authors:  Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Andrea De Lorenzo; Aurora Issa
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  The effects of early administration of atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography: advantages and disadvantages of early dobutamine-atropine protocol.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Camarozano; Aristarco G Siqueira-Filho; Luis Henrique Weitzel; Plínio Resende; Rosângela Aparecida Noé
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.062

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Mastrocola; Barbara Juarez Amorim; João Vicente Vitola; Simone Cristina Soares Brandão; Gabriel Blacher Grossman; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Rafael Willain Lopes; William Azem Chalela; Lara Cristiane Terra Ferreira Carreira; José Roberto Nolasco de Araújo; Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita; José Claudio Meneghetti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.