Literature DB >> 2218718

A randomized double-blind prospective study of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields for interbody lumbar fusions.

V Mooney1.   

Abstract

A randomized double-blind prospective study of pulsed electromagnetic fields for lumbar interbody fusions was performed on 195 subjects. There were 98 subjects in the active group and 97 subjects in the placebo group. A brace containing equipment to induce an electromagnetic field was applied to patients undergoing interbody fusion in the active group, and a sham brace was used in the control group. In the active group there was a 92% success rate, while the control group had a 65% success rate (P greater than 0.005). The effectiveness of bone graft stimulation with the device is thus established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2218718     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199007000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of spondylolysis with external electrical stimulation in young athletes: a critical literature review.

Authors:  D Stasinopoulos
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts.

Authors:  Jean C Gan; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical significance of different effects of static and pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoclast cultures.

Authors:  Simona Angela Barnaba; Laura Ruzzini; Alberto Di Martino; Angela Lanotte; Alessandro Sgambato; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Does Capacitively Coupled Electric Fields Stimulation Improve Clinical Outcomes After Instrumented Spinal Fusion? A Multicentered Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Leo Massari; Giovanni Barbanti Brodano; Stefania Setti; Gaetano Caruso; Enrico Gallazzi; Simona Salati; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 6.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

7.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoblastlike cells (MG-63): a pilot study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sollazzo; Annalisa Palmieri; Furio Pezzetti; Leo Massari; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy improves tendon-to-bone healing in a rat rotator cuff repair model.

Authors:  Jennica J Tucker; James M Cirone; Tyler R Morris; Courtney A Nuss; Julianne Huegel; Erik I Waldorff; Nianli Zhang; James T Ryaby; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-07-26

10.  Effects of focused continuous pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on early tendon-to-bone healing.

Authors:  Oleg Dolkart; Efi Kazum; Yoav Rosenthal; Osnat Sher; Guy Morag; Elad Yakobson; Ofir Chechik; Eran Maman
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.