Literature DB >> 22187161

Improved measures of phase-coupling between spikes and the Local Field Potential.

Martin Vinck1, Francesco Paolo Battaglia, Thilo Womelsdorf, Cyriel Pennartz.   

Abstract

An important tool to study rhythmic neuronal synchronization is provided by relating spiking activity to the Local Field Potential (LFP). Two types of interdependent spike-LFP measures exist. The first approach is to directly quantify the consistency of single spike-LFP phases across spikes, referred to here as point-field phase synchronization measures. We show that conventional point-field phase synchronization measures are sensitive not only to the consistency of spike-LFP phases, but are also affected by statistical dependencies between spike-LFP phases, caused by e.g. non-Poissonian history-effects within spike trains such as bursting and refractoriness. To solve this problem, we develop a new pairwise measure that is not biased by the number of spikes and not affected by statistical dependencies between spike-LFP phases. The second approach is to quantify, similar to EEG-EEG coherence, the consistency of the relative phase between spike train and LFP signals across trials instead of across spikes, referred to here as spike train to field phase synchronization measures. We demonstrate an analytical relationship between point-field and spike train to field phase synchronization measures. Based on this relationship, we prove that the spike train to field pairwise phase consistency (PPC), a quantity closely related to the squared spike-field coherence, is a monotonically increasing function of the number of spikes per trial. This derived relationship is exact and analytic, and takes a linear form for weak phase-coupling. To solve this problem, we introduce a corrected version of the spike train to field PPC that is independent of the number of spikes per trial. Finally, we address the problem that dependencies between spike-LFP phase and the number of spikes per trial can cause spike-LFP phase synchronization measures to be biased by the number of trials. We show how to modify the developed point-field and spike train to field phase synchronization measures in order to make them unbiased by the number of trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22187161      PMCID: PMC3394239          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-011-0374-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  92 in total

1.  Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex.

Authors:  Bijan Pesaran; John S Pezaris; Maneesh Sahani; Partha P Mitra; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies.

Authors:  Ryan T Canolty; Karunesh Ganguly; Steven W Kennerley; Charles F Cadieu; Kilian Koepsell; Jonathan D Wallis; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessing neuronal coherence with single-unit, multi-unit, and local field potentials.

Authors:  Magteld Zeitler; Pascal Fries; Stan Gielen
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Phase-of-firing coding of natural visual stimuli in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Marcelo A Montemurro; Malte J Rasch; Yusuke Murayama; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Marcelo A Montemurro; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Neuronal assembly dynamics in the beta1 frequency range permits short-term memory.

Authors:  N Kopell; M A Whittington; M A Kramer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties.

Authors:  C M Gray; P König; A K Engel; W Singer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Spatiotemporal analysis of local field potentials and unit discharges in cat cerebral cortex during natural wake and sleep states.

Authors:  A Destexhe; D Contreras; M Steriade
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources.

Authors:  Cornelis J Stam; Guido Nolte; Andreas Daffertshofer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Single-trial phase precession in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Robert Schmidt; Kamran Diba; Christian Leibold; Dietmar Schmitz; György Buzsáki; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  54 in total

1.  Attentional modulation of cell-class-specific gamma-band synchronization in awake monkey area v4.

Authors:  Martin Vinck; Thilo Womelsdorf; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Robert Desimone; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A θ-γ oscillation code for neuronal coordination during motor behavior.

Authors:  Jun Igarashi; Yoshikazu Isomura; Kensuke Arai; Rie Harukuni; Tomoki Fukai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rate-adjusted spike-LFP coherence comparisons from spike-train statistics.

Authors:  Mikio C Aoi; Kyle Q Lepage; Mark A Kramer; Uri T Eden
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Fast spiking interneuron activity in primate striatum tracks learning of attention cues.

Authors:  Kianoush Banaie Boroujeni; Mariann Oemisch; Seyed Alireza Hassani; Thilo Womelsdorf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Adaptive spike-artifact removal from local field potentials uncovers prominent beta and gamma band neuronal synchronization.

Authors:  Kianoush Banaie Boroujeni; Paul Tiesinga; Thilo Womelsdorf
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Category-selective phase coding in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Hjalmar K Turesson; Nikos K Logothetis; Kari L Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inhibition of mediodorsal thalamus disrupts thalamofrontal connectivity and cognition.

Authors:  Sebastien Parnaudeau; Pia-Kelsey O'Neill; Scott S Bolkan; Ryan D Ward; Atheir I Abbas; Bryan L Roth; Peter D Balsam; Joshua A Gordon; Christoph Kellendonk
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The parietal reach region selectively anti-synchronizes with dorsal premotor cortex during planning.

Authors:  Chess Stetson; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stimulus repetition modulates gamma-band synchronization in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Nicolas M Brunet; Conrado A Bosman; Martin Vinck; Mark Roberts; Robert Oostenveld; Robert Desimone; Peter De Weerd; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Gamma-Rhythmic Gain Modulation.

Authors:  Jianguang Ni; Thomas Wunderle; Christopher Murphy Lewis; Robert Desimone; Ilka Diester; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.