Literature DB >> 22184760

Predictors of patient satisfaction with Mohs surgery: analysis of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors in a prospective cohort.

Maryam M Asgari1, E Margaret Warton, Romain Neugebauer, Mary-Margaret Chren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables that predict higher short- and long-term patient satisfaction with Mohs surgery.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A university-based dermatology practice and the affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center dermatology clinic. PATIENTS: A total of 339 consecutive patients treated with Mohs surgery in 1999 and 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term satisfaction at 1 week and long-term satisfaction at 1 year. We used directed acyclic graphs to determine appropriate confounding adjustment for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables that influence satisfaction with Mohs surgery in logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Better preoperative skin-related quality of life (measured using Skindex) and more intraoperative Mohs stages were the most salient predictors of higher short- and long-term satisfaction; these odds ratios (ORs) were 2.33 (95% CI, 1.01-5.35) and 5.19 (1.66-16.29), respectively, for preoperative skin-related quality of life and 7.06 (2.02-24.67) and 5.30 (1.24-22.64), respectively, for more intraoperative Mohs stages. Patients not bothered by postoperative bleeding were more likely to be satisfied short term (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.25-4.05), as were those who considered themselves involved in decision making about their treatment (3.05; 1.52-6.10). Higher long-term satisfaction with Mohs surgery was observed among patients who were married (2.36; 1.10-5.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher short- and long-term satisfaction with Mohs surgery is predicted by better preoperative skin-related quality of life and by more intraoperative Mohs stages. The effect of postoperative variables wanes over time, suggesting that factors influencing satisfaction can vary depending on the time frame when satisfaction is measured. Our results may help clinicians identify patients who are at higher risk of dissatisfaction following Mohs surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184760      PMCID: PMC3620041          DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  29 in total

1.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Pearl; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Primary closure vs second-intention treatment of skin punch biopsy sites: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Leslie J Christenson; P Kim Phillips; Amy L Weaver; Clark C Otley
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review?

Authors:  J N Katz; L C Chang; O Sangha; A H Fossel; D W Bates
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Relationship of depression to patient satisfaction: findings from the barriers to breast cancer study.

Authors:  Quynh-Uyen T Bui; Glenn V Ostir; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean Freeman; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits.

Authors:  Henry Thomas Stelfox; Tejal K Gandhi; E John Orav; Michael L Gustafson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Effects of patient satisfaction with care on health-related quality of life: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Renzi; S Tabolli; A Picardi; D Abeni; P Puddu; M Braga
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  The voice of the patient: a national, representative study of satisfaction with family physicians.

Authors:  Robert J Wolosin
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.926

10.  Patient-physician consensus on quality of life in dermatology.

Authors:  G B Jemec; H C Wulf
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.470

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Needs assessment for Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Maryam M Asgari; Jonathan M Olson; Murad Alam
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Evaluation of preoperative quality of life in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Phillip Okhovat; Pritesh S Karia; Ariana N Mora; Frederick C Morgan; Robert J Besaw; Chrysalyne D Schmults
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Patient Satisfaction After Mohs Surgery is not Dependent on Seeing Post-Mohs Defect Prior to Repair.

Authors:  Ganary Dabiri; Jeffrey Tiger; Heidi Anderson; Satori Iwamoto
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-11

4.  Wound care quality of life in aging patients undergoing electrodessication and curettage on the back.

Authors:  Kara Pretzlaff; Lindsey West; Michael N Nemeh; Divya Srivastava; Rajiv I Nijhawan
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.017

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.