Literature DB >> 22184488

Factors related to the implementation and use of an innovation in cancer surgery.

R Urquhart1, J Sargeant, G A Porterm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nationally, efforts to implement an innovation in cancer surgery-a Web-based synoptic reporting tool-are ongoing in five provinces. The objective of the present study was to identify the key multilevel factors influencing implementation and early use of this innovation for breast and colorectal cancer surgery at two academic hospitals in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
METHODS: We used case-study methodology to examine the implementation of surgical synoptic reporting. Methods included semi-structured interviews with key informants (surgeons, implementation team members, and report end users; n = 9), nonparticipant observation, and document analysis. A thematic analysis was conducted separately for each method, followed by explanation-building to integrate the evidence and to identify the key multilevel factors influencing implementation. An audit was performed to determine use.
RESULTS: Key factors influencing implementation were these: Innovation-values fitFlexibility with the innovation and implementationThe innovation is not flawlessStrengthening the climate for implementationResource needs and availabilityPartner engagementSurgeon champions and involvementIn a 6-month period after implementation, 91.2% and 58.0% respectively of eligible breast and colorectal cancer surgeries were reported using the new tool.
CONCLUSIONS: An improved understanding of the multilevel factors influencing the implementation of innovations is critical to planning effective change interventions in health care. Further study is needed to explore differences in the use of the innovation between breast and colorectal cancer surgeons. Findings will inform the study of additional cases of synoptic reporting implementation, enabling cross-case analyses and identification of higher-level themes that may be applied in similar settings or contexts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; cancer; surgery; synoptic reporting

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184488      PMCID: PMC3224028          DOI: 10.3747/co.v18i6.961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  20 in total

1.  The dictated operative note: important but is it being taught?

Authors:  R A Moore
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.

Authors:  E B Ferlie; S M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Electronic synoptic operative reporting: assessing the reliability and completeness of synoptic reports for pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Jason Park; Venu G Pillarisetty; Murray F Brennan; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P Dematteo; Daniel G Coit; Maria Janakos; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Breast Cancer Guidelines in Canada: A Review of Development and Implementation.

Authors:  Amy Folkes; Robin Urquhart; Louise Zitzelsberger; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: Why do some hospitals succeed?

Authors:  E H Bradley; E S Holmboe; J A Mattera; S A Roumanis; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Joseph D Phillips; Colin E Rock; Amanda Hayman; Jay B Prystowsky; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.

Authors:  Neal W Wilkinson; Azin Shahryarinejad; Janet S Winston; Nancy Watroba; Stephen B Edge
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Tom McGowan; Andrea Maclean; Marilyn Raby; Jillian Ross; Sarah Kramer; Carol Sawka
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Sustainability of a practice-individualized preventive service delivery intervention.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Meredith A Goodwin; Stephen J Zyzanski; Allen J Dietrich
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges.

Authors:  Alison L Kitson; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Gill Harvey; Brendan McCormack; Kate Seers; Angie Titchen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  8 in total

1.  Improving cancer control in Canada through knowledge translation: from in-the-field projects to policy initiatives in a new standing section in Current Oncology.

Authors:  M A O'Brien; E Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Health System-Level Factors Influence the Implementation of Complex Innovations in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Lois Jackson; Joan Sargeant; Geoffrey A Porter; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-11

3.  Cross-disciplinary research in cancer: an opportunity to narrow the knowledge-practice gap.

Authors:  R Urquhart; E Grunfeld; L Jackson; J Sargeant; G A Porter
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Diffusion of Electronic Medical Record Based Public Hospital Information Systems.

Authors:  Kyoung Won Cho; Seong Min Kim; Chang-Ho An; Young Moon Chae
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2015-07-31

5.  Implementation and use of electronic synoptic cancer reporting: an explorative case study of six Norwegian pathology laboratories.

Authors:  Bettina Casati; Hans Kristian Haugland; Gunn Marit J Barstad; Roger Bjugn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Barriers and facilitators to the integration of depression services in primary care in Vietnam: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jill Murphy; Kitty K Corbett; Dang Thuy Linh; Pham Thi Oanh; Vu Cong Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Factors affecting the implementation and use of electronic templates for histopathology cancer reporting.

Authors:  Bettina Casati; Hans Kristian Haugland; Gunn Marit J Barstad; Roger Bjugn
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.306

8.  Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Geoffrey A Porter; Joan Sargeant; Lois Jackson; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 7.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.