Literature DB >> 19466743

Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.

John R Srigley1, Tom McGowan, Andrea Maclean, Marilyn Raby, Jillian Ross, Sarah Kramer, Carol Sawka.   

Abstract

Cancer pathology reports contain information which is critical for patient management and for cancer surveillance, resource planning, and quality purposes. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has defined scientifically validated content of checklists that form the basis for synoptic cancer pathology reporting. We outline how the CAP standards were implemented in a large Canadian province over a 3-year period resulting in improvements in rates of synoptic reporting and completeness of cancer pathology reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466743     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  50 in total

1.  Health System-Level Factors Influence the Implementation of Complex Innovations in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Lois Jackson; Joan Sargeant; Geoffrey A Porter; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Physician level reporting of surgical and pathology performance indicators: a regional study to assess feasibility and impact on quality.

Authors:  Craig McFadyen; Sara Lankshear; Dimitrios Divaris; Mark Berry; Amber Hunter; John Srigley; Jonathan Irish
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.

Authors:  Maria Urbanowicz; Heike I Grabsch; Frederic Fiteni; Yan Liu; Carmela Caballero; Jean-François Fléjou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Modeling complexity in pathologist workload measurement: the Automatable Activity-Based Approach to Complexity Unit Scoring (AABACUS).

Authors:  Carol C Cheung; Emina E Torlakovic; Hung Chow; Dale C Snover; Sylvia L Asa
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and Pathology: Toward Strengthening the Critical Relationship.

Authors:  Máire A Duggan; William F Anderson; Sean Altekruse; Lynne Penberthy; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Factors related to the implementation and use of an innovation in cancer surgery.

Authors:  R Urquhart; J Sargeant; G A Porterm
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Quality of inguinal hernia operative reports: room for improvement.

Authors:  Grace W Ma; Amandeep Pooni; Shawn S Forbes; Cagla Eskicioglu; Emily Pearsall; Fred D Brenneman; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Adequacy of pathology reports of specimens from patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Ma Luisa Isidro; Gloria Lugo; Olga Fidalgo; Sara García-Arias
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.943

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.