Literature DB >> 22184425

Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems.

I Leinonen1, A G Williams, J Wiseman, J Guy, I Kyriazakis.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to apply a life cycle assessment (LCA) method, from cradle to gate, to quantify the environmental burdens per 1,000 kg of eggs produced in the 4 major hen-egg production systems in the United Kingdom: 1) cage, 2) barn, 3) free range, and 4) organic. The analysis was based on an approach that applied a structural model for the industry and mechanistic submodels for animal performance, crop production, and nutrient flows. Baseline feeds representative of those used by the UK egg production industry were used. Typical figures from the UK egg production industry, feed intake, mortality of birds, farm energy, and material use in different systems were applied. Monte Carlo simulations were used to quantify the uncertainties in the outputs and allow for comparisons between the systems. The number of birds required to produce 1,000 kg of eggs was highest in the organic and lowest in the cage system; similarly, the amount of feed consumed per bird was highest in the organic and lowest in the cage system. These general differences in productivity largely affected the differences in the environmental impacts between the systems. Feed production, processing, and transport caused greater impacts compared with those from any other component of production; that is, 54 to 75% of the primary energy use and 64 to 72% of the global warming potential of the systems. Electricity (used mainly for ventilation, automatic feeding, and lighting) had the second greatest impact in primary energy use (16-38%). Gas and oil (used mainly for heating in pullet rearing and incineration of dead layer birds) used 7 to 14% of the total primary energy. Manure had the greatest impact on the acidification and eutrophication potentials of the systems because of ammonia emissions that contributed to both of these potentials and nitrate leaching that only affected eutrophication potential. The LCA method allows for comparisons between systems and for the identification of hotspots of environmental impacts that could be subject to mitigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22184425     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  ECOALIM: A Dataset of Environmental Impacts of Feed Ingredients Used in French Animal Production.

Authors:  Aurélie Wilfart; Sandrine Espagnol; Sylvie Dauguet; Aurélie Tailleur; Armelle Gac; Florence Garcia-Launay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment.

Authors:  Laura Scherer; Brian Tomasik; Oscar Rueda; Stephan Pfister
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods.

Authors:  Laurence G Smith; Guy J D Kirk; Philip J Jones; Adrian G Williams
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Expression of Oocyte Vitellogenesis Receptor Was Regulated by C/EBPα in Developing Follicle of Wanxi White Goose.

Authors:  Yeye Du; Xingyong Chen; Han Yang; Linghong Sun; Congcong Wei; Wanli Yang; Yutong Zhao; Zhengquan Liu; Zhaoyu Geng
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Assessment of Environmental Impacts from Different Perspectives-Case Study of Egg Value Chain System in Serbia.

Authors:  Marija Mitrovic; Igor Tomasevic; Ilija Djekic
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  Implications for Welfare, Productivity and Sustainability of the Variation in Reported Levels of Mortality for Laying Hen Flocks Kept in Different Housing Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Studies.

Authors:  Claire A Weeks; Sarah L Lambton; Adrian G Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of the environmental footprint of the egg industry in the United States in 1960 and 2010.

Authors:  Nathan Pelletier; Maro Ibarburu; Hongwei Xin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  What Makes Consumers Purchase Fresh Eggs in Supermarkets: The Effect of Unrealistic Choice Set Matters.

Authors:  Shang-Ho Yang; Widya Satya Nugraha
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Sustainability of Rearing System Using Multicriteria Analysis: Application in Commercial Poultry Production.

Authors:  Lucia Rocchi; Alice Cartoni Mancinelli; Luisa Paolotti; Simona Mattioli; Antonio Boggia; Francesco Papi; Cesare Castellini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Measurement of green total factor productivity on Chinese laying hens: From the perspective of regional differences.

Authors:  Junzhi Li; Junwei Li; Zhenlei Sun; Shen Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.