OBJECTIVES: Protection of workers from second-hand smoke (SHS) in occupational settings is an important policy priority, yet little attention has been given to SHS protection for home visitation health workers, who number almost 2 million in the USA. Self-reported SHS exposure, SHS mitigation strategies and suggestions for further SHS exposure reduction approaches were obtained from home visitation health workers in Massachusetts. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Massachusetts Early Intervention workers (N=316) at their state-wide conference in April 2010. RESULTS: Eighty-three per cent of respondents reported at least 1 hour per month of SHS exposure, and 16% reported at least 11 hours per month. Nevertheless, only 22% of workers counselled clients on maintaining a smoke-free home. Fewer than 30% of workers had ever voiced concerns to their employing agency, and just 12% had raised their concerns directly with clients. Only 14% stated that their agency had rules designed to protect workers from SHS. CONCLUSIONS: SHS exposure occurs frequently among home visitation health workers. The data point to a substantial population who are not protected from SHS exposure by formal policies.
OBJECTIVES: Protection of workers from second-hand smoke (SHS) in occupational settings is an important policy priority, yet little attention has been given to SHS protection for home visitation health workers, who number almost 2 million in the USA. Self-reported SHS exposure, SHS mitigation strategies and suggestions for further SHS exposure reduction approaches were obtained from home visitation health workers in Massachusetts. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Massachusetts Early Intervention workers (N=316) at their state-wide conference in April 2010. RESULTS: Eighty-three per cent of respondents reported at least 1 hour per month of SHS exposure, and 16% reported at least 11 hours per month. Nevertheless, only 22% of workers counselled clients on maintaining a smoke-free home. Fewer than 30% of workers had ever voiced concerns to their employing agency, and just 12% had raised their concerns directly with clients. Only 14% stated that their agency had rules designed to protect workers from SHS. CONCLUSIONS: SHS exposure occurs frequently among home visitation health workers. The data point to a substantial population who are not protected from SHS exposure by formal policies.
Authors: Ellen J Hahn; Mary Kay Rayens; Nancy York; Chizimuzo T C Okoli; Mei Zhang; Mark Dignan; Wael K Al-Delaimy Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Patrick Goodman; Michelle Agnew; Marie McCaffrey; Gillian Paul; Luke Clancy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Silvano Gallus; Piergiorgio Zuccaro; Paolo Colombo; Giovanni Apolone; Roberta Pacifici; Silvio Garattini; Cristina Bosetti; Carlo La Vecchia Journal: Prev Med Date: 2007-03-31 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Hugo Destaillats; Lara A Gundel; Mohamad Sleiman; Brett C Singer; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz; Jonathan P Winickoff; Virender Rehan; Prue Talbot; Suzaynn Schick; Jonathan Samet; Yinsheng Wang; Bo Hang; Manuela Martins-Green; James F Pankow; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 9.031