Literature DB >> 22184203

The influence of maternal and paternal factors on time to pregnancy--a Dutch population-based birth-cohort study: the GECKO Drenthe study.

M A Q Mutsaerts1, H Groen, H G Huiting, W K H Kuchenbecker, P J J Sauer, J A Land, R P Stolk, A Hoek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both maternal and paternal factors have been suggested to influence a couple's fecundity. To investigate this, we examined the role of several maternal and paternal lifestyle and socio-demographic factors as determinants of time to pregnancy (TTP) in a Dutch birth-cohort.
METHODS: Groningen Expert Center for Kids with Obesity (GECKO) Drenthe is a population-based birth-cohort study of children born between April 2006 and April 2007 in Drenthe, a province of The Netherlands. Both partners received extensive questionnaires during pregnancy. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine the impact of the investigated factors on TTP.
RESULTS: A total of 4778 children were born, and the parents of 2997 children (63%) gave their consent to participate. After excluding unintended pregnancies and pregnancies as a result of fertility treatment, the data of 1924 couples were available for analysis. Hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals of factors influencing TTP in multivariable Cox regression analysis were: maternal age 1.23 (0.98-1.54) for age <25 years, 1.17 (1.03-1.32) for age 25-30 years and 0.72 (0.61-0.85) for age >35 years (reference category: 30-35 years); paternal age: 1.31 (0.94-1.82) for age <25 years, 1.11 (0.97-1.28) for age 25-30 years and 0.91 (0.80-1.04 for age >35 years (reference category: 30-35 years); nulliparity: 0.76 (0.68-0.85) versus multiparity; menstrual cycle length: 1.12 (0.95-1.30) for 3 weeks, 0.72 (0.62-0.83) for 4-6 weeks, 0.68 (0.40-1.16) for >6 weeks and 0.66 (0.54-0.81) for irregular cycle (reference category: 4 weeks); prior contraceptive use: 0.78 (0.67-0.91) for no contraception, 1.68 (1.45-1.95) for condom use, 1.08 (0.89-1.33) for condom use combined with oral contraception, 1.40 (1.16-1.70) for intrauterine device and 0.50 (0.25-1.01) for contraceptive injection (reference category: oral contraception); and maternal educational level 0.75 (0.62-0.92) for low education level and 0.81 (0.73-0.90) for medium educational level (reference category: high educational level).
CONCLUSIONS: This population-based birth-cohort study performed in fertile couples who had conceived revealed neither maternal nor paternal modifiable lifestyle factors were significantly associated with TTP after adjustment for confounding by socio-demographic factors. In contrast, several non-modifiable maternal socio-demographic factors are significant predictors of a couple's fecundity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184203     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  Introduction to Environmental Harmful Factors.

Authors:  Jiarong Guo; Peng Tian; Zhongyan Xu; Huidong Zhang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Women's alcohol consumption and cumulative incidence of live birth following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  L E Dodge; S A Missmer; K L Thornton; M R Hacker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Hormonal contraceptive use before and after conception in relation to preterm birth and small for gestational age: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  E T Jensen; J L Daniels; T Stürmer; W R Robinson; C J Williams; K Vejrup; P Magnus; M P Longnecker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Adverse childhood event experiences, fertility difficulties and menstrual cycle characteristics.

Authors:  Marni B Jacobs; Renee D Boynton-Jarrett; Emily W Harville
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.949

5.  Fertility after intrauterine device removal: a pilot study.

Authors:  Amy M Stoddard; Hanna Xu; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Reproductive Patterns Among Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Survivors in Sweden: A Population-Based Matched-Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gabriela Armuand; Agneta Skoog-Svanberg; Marie Bladh; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Female adiposity and time-to-pregnancy: a multiethnic prospective cohort.

Authors:  S L Loy; Y B Cheung; S E Soh; S Ng; M T Tint; I M Aris; J Y Bernard; Y S Chong; K M Godfrey; L P Shek; K H Tan; Y S Lee; H H Tan; B S M Chern; N Lek; F Yap; S Y Chan; C Chi; J K Y Chan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Alcohol intake, reproductive hormones, and menstrual cycle function: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karen C Schliep; Shvetha M Zarek; Enrique F Schisterman; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Maurizio Trevisan; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Neil J Perkins; Sunni L Mumford
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne Sweeney; Courtney D Lynch; Sungduk Kim; José M Maisog; Robert Gore-Langton; Michael L Eisenberg; Zhen Chen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The prevalence of couple infertility in the United States from a male perspective: evidence from a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  J F Louis; M E Thoma; D N Sørensen; A C McLain; R B King; R Sundaram; N Keiding; G M Buck Louis
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.