Literature DB >> 22183595

Monitoring dynamic binding of chromatin proteins in vivo by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and temporal image correlation spectroscopy.

Davide Mazza1, Timothy J Stasevich, Tatiana S Karpova, James G McNally.   

Abstract

Live-cell microscopy has demonstrated that many nuclear proteins bind transiently to target sites in chromatin. These binding interactions can be detected and quantified by two related live-cell imaging techniques, Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) and Temporal Image Correlation Spectroscopy (TICS). With proper quantitative modeling, it is possible to obtain estimates from FCS and TICS data of the association and dissociation rates of nuclear protein binding to chromatin. These binding rates permit calculating the fractions of free and bound protein in the nucleus, plus the time required to diffuse from one binding site to the next and the dwell time on a chromatin target. In this protocol, we summarize the underlying principles of FCS and TICS, and then describe how these data should be collected and analyzed to extract estimates of in vivo binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22183595      PMCID: PMC7467629          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-477-3_12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  20 in total

1.  Measurement of lateral transport on cell surfaces.

Authors:  E L Elson; J Schlessinger; D E Koppel; D Axelrod; W W Webb
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1976

2.  Afterpulsing and its correction in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy experiments.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Lei Jin; Bo Chen; Yao Ding; Hui Ma; Dieyan Chen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Dissecting chromatin interactions in living cells from protein mobility maps.

Authors:  Fabian Erdel; Katharina Müller-Ott; Michael Baum; Malte Wachsmuth; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates.

Authors:  Timothy J Stasevich; Florian Mueller; Ariel Michelman-Ribeiro; Tilman Rosales; Jay R Knutson; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Sampling effects, noise, and photobleaching in temporal image correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  David L Kolin; Santiago Costantino; Paul W Wiseman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  High-speed confocal fluorescence imaging with a novel line scanning microscope.

Authors:  Ralf Wolleschensky; Bernhard Zimmermann; Michael Kempe
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Spatially resolved fluorescence correlation spectroscopy using a spinning disk confocal microscope.

Authors:  Daniel R Sisan; Richard Arevalo; Catherine Graves; Ryan McAllister; Jeffrey S Urbach
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Precise measurement of diffusion coefficients using scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Zdenek Petrásek; Petra Schwille
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Photobleaching in two-photon scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Zdenek Petrásek; Petra Schwille
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 10.  FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know?

Authors:  Florian Mueller; Davide Mazza; Timothy J Stasevich; James G McNally
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 8.382

View more
  11 in total

1.  Exploring the dynamics of cell processes through simulations of fluorescence microscopy experiments.

Authors:  Juan Angiolini; Nicolas Plachta; Esteban Mocskos; Valeria Levi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Quantifying transcription factor binding dynamics at the single-molecule level in live cells.

Authors:  Diego M Presman; David A Ball; Ville Paakinaho; Jonathan B Grimm; Luke D Lavis; Tatiana S Karpova; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Complex dynamics of transcription regulation.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; Lyuba Varticovski; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-28

4.  FACT is recruited to the +1 nucleosome of transcribed genes and spreads in a Chd1-dependent manner.

Authors:  Célia Jeronimo; Andrew Angel; Vu Q Nguyen; Jee Min Kim; Christian Poitras; Elie Lambert; Pierre Collin; Jane Mellor; Carl Wu; François Robert
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 19.328

5.  Dynamics of the ternary complex formed by c-Myc interactor JPO2, transcriptional co-activator LEDGF/p75, and chromatin.

Authors:  Jelle Hendrix; Bart van Heertum; Els Vanstreels; Dirk Daelemans; Jan De Rijck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.486

6.  Quantitation of glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding dynamics by single-molecule microscopy and FRAP.

Authors:  Femke L Groeneweg; Martin E van Royen; Susanne Fenz; Veer I P Keizer; Bart Geverts; Jurrien Prins; E Ron de Kloet; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Thomas S Schmidt; Marcel J M Schaaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  On the way of revealing coactivator complexes cross-talk during transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Aleksey N Krasnov; Marina Yu Mazina; Julia V Nikolenko; Nadezhda E Vorobyeva
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 7.133

Review 8.  Nuclear envelope mechanobiology: linking the nuclear structure and function.

Authors:  Matthew Goelzer; Julianna Goelzer; Matthew L Ferguson; Corey P Neu; Gunes Uzer
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 9.  Advanced fluorescence microscopy methods for the real-time study of transcription and chromatin dynamics.

Authors:  Paolo Annibale; Enrico Gratton
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2014

10.  The Trithorax group protein ASH1 requires a combination of BAH domain and AT hooks, but not the SET domain, for mitotic chromatin binding and survival.

Authors:  Philipp A Steffen; Christina Altmutter; Eva Dworschak; Sini Junttila; Attila Gyenesei; Xinzhou Zhu; Tobias Kockmann; Leonie Ringrose
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.