Literature DB >> 22183581

The role of tandem duplicator phenotype in tumour evolution in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Charlotte K Y Ng1, Susanna L Cooke, Kevin Howe, Scott Newman, Jian Xian, Jillian Temple, Elizabeth M Batty, Jessica C M Pole, Simon P Langdon, Paul A W Edwards, James D Brenton.   

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is characterized by genomic instability, ubiquitous TP53 loss, and frequent development of platinum resistance. Loss of homologous recombination (HR) is a mutator phenotype present in 50% of HGSOCs and confers hypersensitivity to platinum treatment. We asked which other mutator phenotypes are present in HGSOC and how they drive the emergence of platinum resistance. We performed whole-genome paired-end sequencing on a model of two HGSOC cases, each consisting of a pair of cell lines established before and after clinical resistance emerged, to describe their structural variants (SVs) and to infer their ancestral genomes as the SVs present within each pair. The first case (PEO1/PEO4), with HR deficiency, acquired translocations and small deletions through its early evolution, but a revertant BRCA2 mutation restoring HR function in the resistant lineage re-stabilized its genome and reduced platinum sensitivity. The second case (PEO14/PEO23) had 216 tandem duplications and did not show evidence of HR or mismatch repair deficiency. By comparing the cell lines to the tissues from which they originated, we showed that the tandem duplicator mutator phenotype arose early in progression in vivo and persisted throughout evolution in vivo and in vitro, which may have enabled continual evolution. From the analysis of SNP array data from 454 HGSOC cases in The Cancer Genome Atlas series, we estimate that 12.8% of cases show patterns of aberrations similar to the tandem duplicator, and this phenotype is mutually exclusive with BRCA1/2 carrier mutations.
Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22183581     DOI: 10.1002/path.3980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  34 in total

1.  Reconstructing cancer genomes from paired-end sequencing data.

Authors:  Layla Oesper; Anna Ritz; Sarah J Aerni; Ryan Drebin; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Next-generation sequencing of duplication CNVs reveals that most are tandem and some create fusion genes at breakpoints.

Authors:  Scott Newman; Karen E Hermetz; Brooke Weckselblatt; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Mechanisms underlying mutational signatures in human cancers.

Authors:  Thomas Helleday; Saeed Eshtad; Serena Nik-Zainal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Tandem duplications contribute to not one but two distinct phenotypes.

Authors:  Johnathan Watkins; Andrew Tutt; Anita Grigoriadis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Deciphering the Code of the Cancer Genome: Mechanisms of Chromosome Rearrangement.

Authors:  Nicholas A Willis; Emilie Rass; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Reduced accumulation of platinum drugs is not observed in drug-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines derived from cisplatin-treated patients.

Authors:  Marina Stukova; Matthew D Hall; Samantha D Tsotsoros; James P Madigan; Nicholas P Farrell; Michael M Gottesman
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.155

7.  Genomic consequences of aberrant DNA repair mechanisms stratify ovarian cancer histotypes.

Authors:  Yi Kan Wang; Ali Bashashati; Michael S Anglesio; Dawn R Cochrane; Diljot S Grewal; Gavin Ha; Andrew McPherson; Hugo M Horlings; Janine Senz; Leah M Prentice; Anthony N Karnezis; Daniel Lai; Mohamed R Aniba; Allen W Zhang; Karey Shumansky; Celia Siu; Adrian Wan; Melissa K McConechy; Hector Li-Chang; Alicia Tone; Diane Provencher; Manon de Ladurantaye; Hubert Fleury; Aikou Okamoto; Satoshi Yanagida; Nozomu Yanaihara; Misato Saito; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Marco A Marra; C Blake Gilks; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; David G Huntsman; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Structural Alterations Driving Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Revealed by Linked-Read Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Srinivas R Viswanathan; Gavin Ha; Andreas M Hoff; Jeremiah A Wala; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Christopher W Whelan; Nicholas J Haradhvala; Samuel S Freeman; Sarah C Reed; Justin Rhoades; Paz Polak; Michelle Cipicchio; Stephanie A Wankowicz; Alicia Wong; Tushar Kamath; Zhenwei Zhang; Gregory J Gydush; Denisse Rotem; J Christopher Love; Gad Getz; Stacey Gabriel; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Scott M Dehm; Peter S Nelson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Atish D Choudhury; Viktor A Adalsteinsson; Rameen Beroukhim; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Evolution of the cancer genome.

Authors:  Lucy R Yates; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 10.  Cancer genome-sequencing study design.

Authors:  Jill C Mwenifumbo; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.