Literature DB >> 22183207

Risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies: customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth.

Jacob C Larkin1, Lyndon M Hill, Paul D Speer, Hyagriv N Simhan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in pregnancies identified as small for gestational age (SGA) with customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth.
METHODS: Ultrasound-derived estimates of fetal weight were used to generate a fetal growth trajectory (N=7,510). The gestational age at delivery and pathologic and physiologic variables from 5,072 pregnancies were used to calculate a customized threshold for SGA. In a separate analysis of 32,070 pregnancies, rates of morbid outcomes were compared in participants classified as SGA according to a population-based birth weight standard only (SGApop only), a customized standard only (SGAcust only), and both methods (SGAboth).
RESULTS: Eight-hundred seventy-five (2.7%) participants were SGApop only, 1,970 (6.1%) participants were SGAboth, and 609 (1.9%) participants were SGAcust only. The odds ratios of neonatal death in SGApop only and SGAcust only pregnancies were 1.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-13.1) and 54.6 (95% CI 29.0-102.8), respectively. Rates of prematurity in the SGApop only and SGAcust only cohorts were 4.8% and 64.5%, respectively. After adjustment for the effect of prematurity, odds ratios of neonatal death in the SGApop only and SGAcust only cohorts were 4.8 (95% CI 0.6-37.0) and 2.9 (95% CI 1.4-6.1), respectively.
CONCLUSION: After adjustment for confounding stemming from premature delivery, there is little difference in the risk of adverse outcomes between SGAcust only and SGApop only participants. Adoption of customized fetal growth standards into clinical practice may not improve the ability to identify pregnancies with increased risk of perinatal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22183207     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823dc56e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Roberto Romero; Dereje W Gudicha; Offer Erez; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Gaurav Bhatti; Percy Pacora; Eli Maymon; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standard for short-term neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Nathan R Blue; Lisa Mele; William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Ronald J Wapner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George R Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2022-02-18

4.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

5.  The association of cerebral palsy and death with small-for-gestational-age birthweight in preterm neonates by individualized and population-based percentiles.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Dwight J Rouse; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Brian M Mercer; Kenneth J Leveno; Jay D Iams; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Fergal D Malone; Mary J O'Sullivan; Gary D V Hankins; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Differences in risk factors for incident and recurrent small-for-gestational-age birthweight: a hospital-based cohort study.

Authors:  S N Hinkle; P S Albert; P Mendola; L A Sjaarda; N S Boghossian; E Yeung; S K Laughon
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Birth weight reference percentiles for Chinese.

Authors:  Li Dai; Changfei Deng; Yanhua Li; Jun Zhu; Yi Mu; Ying Deng; Meng Mao; Yanping Wang; Qi Li; Shuangge Ma; Xiaomei Ma; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Customized versus Population Growth Standards for Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification Using Ultrasonographic Fetal Growth Assessment at 22 to 29 Weeks' Gestation.

Authors:  Nathan R Blue; William A Grobman; Jacob C Larkin; Christina M Scifres; Hyagriv N Simhan; Judith H Chung; George R Saade; David M Haas; Ronald Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Brian Mercer; Samuel I Parry; Robert M Silver
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age for twins, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Zhuoyang Li; Mark P Umstad; Lisa Hilder; Fenglian Xu; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Small for gestational age: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunisation safety data.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Schlaudecker; Flor M Munoz; Azucena Bardají; Nansi S Boghossian; Asma Khalil; Hatem Mousa; Mirjana Nesin; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Vitali Pool; Hans M L Spiegel; Milagritos D Tapia; Sonali Kochhar; Steven Black
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.