Elena N Atochina-Vasserman1. 1. Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Vernon and Shirley Hill Pavilion, #H410C, 380 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104-4539, USA. atochina@mail.med.upenn.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is a member of the family of proteins termed collagen-like lectins or "collectins" that play a role in non-antibody-mediated innate immune responses [1]. The primary function of SP-D is the modulation of host defense and inflammation [2]. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This review will discuss recent findings on the physiological importance of SP-D S-nitrosylation in biological systems and potential mechanisms that govern SP-D mediated signaling. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: SP-D appears to have both pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling functions. SP-D multimerization is a critical feature of its function and plays an important role in efficient innate host defense. Under baseline conditions, SP-D forms a multimer in which the N-termini are hidden in the center and the C-termini are on the surface. This multimeric form of SP-D is limited in its ability to activate inflammation. However, NO can modify key cysteine residues in the hydrophobic tail domain of SP-D resulting in a dissociation of SP-D multimers into trimers, exposing the S-nitrosylated N-termini. The exposed S-nitrosylated tail domain binds to the calreticulin/CD91 receptor complex and initiates a pro-inflammatory response through phosphorylation of p38 and NF-κB activation [3,4]. In addition, the disassembled SP-D loses its ability to block TLR4, which also results in activation of NF-κB. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Recent studies have highlighted the capability of NO to modify SP-D through S-nitrosylation, causing the activation of a pro-inflammatory role for SP-D [3]. This represents a novel mechanism both for the regulation of SP-D function and NO's role in innate immunity, but also demonstrates that the S-nitrosylation can control protein function by regulating quaternary structure. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Regulation of Cellular Processes by S-nitrosylation.
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: <span class="Gene">Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is a member of the family of proteins termed collagen-like lectins or "collectins" that play a role in non-antibody-mediated innate immune responses [1]. The primary function of SP-D is the modulation of host defense and inflammation [2]. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This review will discuss recent findings on the physiological importance of SP-D S-nitrosylation in biological systems and potential mechanisms that govern SP-D mediated signaling. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS:SP-D appears to have both pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling functions. SP-D multimerization is a critical feature of its function and plays an important role in efficient innate host defense. Under baseline conditions, SP-D forms a multimer in which the N-termini are hidden in the center and the C-termini are on the surface. This multimeric form of SP-D is limited in its ability to activate inflammation. However, NO can modify key cysteine residues in the hydrophobic tail domain of SP-D resulting in a dissociation of SP-D multimers into trimers, exposing the S-nitrosylated N-termini. The exposed S-nitrosylated tail domain binds to the calreticulin/CD91 receptor complex and initiates a pro-inflammatory response through phosphorylation of p38 and NF-κB activation [3,4]. In addition, the disassembled SP-D loses its ability to block TLR4, which also results in activation of NF-κB. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Recent studies have highlighted the capability of NO to modify SP-D through S-nitrosylation, causing the activation of a pro-inflammatory role for SP-D [3]. This represents a novel mechanism both for the regulation of SP-D function and NO's role in innate immunity, but also demonstrates that the S-nitrosylation can control protein function by regulating quaternary structure. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Regulation of Cellular Processes by S-nitrosylation.
Authors: Elena N Atochina; Michael F Beers; Samuel Hawgood; Francis Poulain; Christiana Davis; Trevor Fusaro; Andrew J Gow Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2003-07-18 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Niki L Reynaert; Karina Ckless; Solange H Korn; Nanda Vos; Amy S Guala; Emiel F M Wouters; Albert van der Vliet; Yvonne M W Janssen-Heininger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Maria Quisgaard Gaunsbaek; Karina Juhl Rasmussen; Michael F Beers; Elena N Atochina-Vasserman; Soren Hansen Journal: Lung Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Vasanthi R Sunil; Kinal N Vayas; Jessica A Cervelli; Elena V Ebramova; Andrew J Gow; Michael Goedken; Rama Malaviya; Jeffrey D Laskin; Debra L Laskin Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Mary Francis; Richard Sun; Jessica A Cervelli; Hyejeong Choi; Mili Mandal; Elena V Abramova; Andrew J Gow; Jeffrey D Laskin; Debra L Laskin Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Rama Malaviya; Andrew J Gow; Mary Francis; Elena V Abramova; Jeffrey D Laskin; Debra L Laskin Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Elena N Atochina-Vasserman; Chang-Jiang Guo; Elena Abramova; Thea N Golden; Michael Sims; Melane L James; Michael F Beers; Andrew J Gow; Vera P Krymskaya Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Pablo Hernansanz-Agustín; Alicia Izquierdo-Álvarez; Almudena García-Ortiz; Sales Ibiza; Juan M Serrador; Antonio Martínez-Ruiz Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 8.401