Literature DB >> 22182496

Potential mechanisms underlying the effect of gender on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from the SMART-AV multicenter trial.

Alan Cheng1, Michael R Gold, Alan D Waggoner, Timothy E Meyer, Milan Seth, Joshua Rapkin, Kenneth M Stein, Kenneth A Ellenbogen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrate that women may respond more favorably to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than do men. The mechanisms remain unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the effects of gender on response to CRT and to explore potential mechanisms behind these differences.
METHODS: Data for 846 patients from the SMART-AV trial were used to evaluate the mechanisms behind the effects of gender on CRT response. Atrioventricular optimization (AVO) was performed via SmartDelay or echocardiography. Baseline and 6-month left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi) were fitted to a linear regression model with gender predicting change in LVESVi and adjusted for baseline covariates significantly differing by gender. The interaction variable for AVO and gender was also assessed for its effect on change in LVESVi.
RESULTS: Baseline variables, including age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS width, and severity of heart failure symptoms, were comparable between men and women. Women had a higher incidence of left bundle branch block conduction and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and exhibited greater reductions in LVESVi even after adjustment for these differences (13.4 mL/m(2) vs 8.5 mL/m(2); P = .002). In addition, women had greater percentages of biventricular pacing and appeared to derive greater reductions in left ventricular volume with AVO than did men.
CONCLUSIONS: Women demonstrated greater reductions in LVESVi with CRT than did men. These observations are not explained by differences in baseline characteristics. Greater degrees of biventricular pacing and enhanced response to AVO in women may partly explain the reason for the gender effect on CRT response.
Copyright © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22182496     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  15 in total

1.  Sex differences in optimal atrioventricular delay in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mariëlle Kloosterman; Alexander H Maass
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Heart failure in women.

Authors:  Anne L Taylor
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Recent advances in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Satish Chandraprakasam; Gina G Mentzer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 5.  ICD and CRT use in ischemic heart disease in women.

Authors:  Nishaki Kiran Mehta; William T Abraham; Melanie Maytin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Toward Sex-Specific Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

Authors:  Robbert Zusterzeel; Kimberly A Selzman; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; Daniel A Caños; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen; Anton P M Gorgels; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Cardiac MRI scar patterns differ by sex in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy cohort.

Authors:  Zak Loring; David G Strauss; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Characteristics of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the impact of echocardiographic left ventricular volume.

Authors:  Mi Young Park; Robert K Altman; Mary Orencole; Prabhat Kumar; Kimberly A Parks; Kevin E Heist; Jagmeet P Singh; Michael H Picard
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  QRS narrowing is associated with reverse remodeling in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Alan Cheng; David Spragg; Daniel Cantillon; Mina K Chung; W H Wilson Tang; Bruce L Wilkoff; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  The Contemporary Role of Echocardiography in Improving Patient Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  John Gorcsan; Josef J Marek; Tetsuari Onishi
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.