Literature DB >> 22181234

Cascaded failures in weighted networks.

Baharan Mirzasoleiman1, Mahmoudreza Babaei, Mahdi Jalili, Mohammadali Safari.   

Abstract

Many technological networks can experience random and/or systematic failures in their components. More destructive situations can happen if the components have limited capacity, where the failure in one of them might lead to a cascade of failures in other components, and consequently break down the structure of the network. In this paper, the tolerance of cascaded failures was investigated in weighted networks. Three weighting strategies were considered including the betweenness centrality of the edges, the product of the degrees of the end nodes, and the product of their betweenness centralities. Then, the effect of the cascaded attack was investigated by considering the local weighted flow redistribution rule. The capacity of the edges was considered to be proportional to their initial weight distribution. The size of the survived part of the attacked network was determined in model networks as well as in a number of real-world networks including the power grid, the internet in the level of autonomous system, the railway network of Europe, and the United States airports network. We found that the networks in which the weight of each edge is the multiplication of the betweenness centrality of the end nodes had the best robustness against cascaded failures. In other words, the case where the load of the links is considered to be the product of the betweenness centrality of the end nodes is favored for the robustness of the network against cascaded failures.

Year:  2011        PMID: 22181234     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.046114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  9 in total

1.  Optimal control of aging in complex networks.

Authors:  Eric D Sun; Thomas C T Michaels; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Resiliency of EEG-Based Brain Functional Networks.

Authors:  Mahdi Jalili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ability paradox of cascading model based on betweenness.

Authors:  Jianwei Wang; Bo Xu; Yuedan Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Abnormal Behavior in Cascading Dynamics with Node Weight.

Authors:  Jianwei Wang; Lin Cai; Bo Xu; Yuedan Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Optimizing the robustness of electrical power systems against cascading failures.

Authors:  Yingrui Zhang; Osman Yağan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Modelling cascading failures in networks with the harmonic closeness.

Authors:  Yucheng Hao; Limin Jia; Yanhui Wang; Zhichao He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Optimal Allocation of Node Capacity in Cascade-Robustness Networks.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Jun Zhang; Wen-Bo Du; Oriol Lordan; Jiangjun Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cascading Failures and Vulnerability Evolution in Bus⁻Metro Complex Bilayer Networks under Rainstorm Weather Conditions.

Authors:  Fei Ma; Fei Liu; Kum Fai Yuen; Polin Lai; Qipeng Sun; Xiaodan Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A model for cascading failures with the probability of failure described as a logistic function.

Authors:  Minjung Kim; Jun Soo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.