Literature DB >> 22180400

Optimal assessment of response in ovarian cancer.

E A Eisenhauer1.   

Abstract

Objective tumor response and progression, measured by standard criteria such as RECIST 1.1, are important measures of change in tumor size that are utilized as endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials. In ovarian cancer, RECIST criteria, which are based on anatomical tumor size, have been supplemented by CA125 response and progression criteria developed by the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup. CA125 progression has been integrated with objective criteria into a composite definition of progression often used in the front-line setting, whereas response criteria are generally intended for use in recurrent disease trials. In terms of the performance of these endpoints in clinical trials, objective response, when used to assess the activity of new drugs in phase II trials in recurrent ovarian cancer, has proven to be helpful in identifying agents that have subsequently been shown to improve overall or progression-free survival in randomized trials. Thus, objective response has utility as an endpoint for new drug screening trials. Progression-free survival is often used as the primary (or co-primary) efficacy endpoint in studies of first-line therapy in ovarian cancer. Data from historical studies of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens indicate that improvements in progression-free survival generally translate into overall survival gains, indicating it may qualify as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival. It is not yet clear if this relationship will hold true in randomized trials of targeted agents, making it important to continue to assess overall survival in such studies. Finally, the routine monitoring of CA125 in patients after completion of front-line treatment as part of the standard of care has come under question with the publication of the results of a large European study; therefore, the use of CA125 progression as an endpoint in clinical trials will also likely be debated in the coming years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180400     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  5 in total

1.  Imaging VCAM-1 as an indicator of treatment efficacy in metastatic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer M Scalici; Stephanie Thomas; Christine Harrer; Timothy A Raines; Joanna Curran; Kristen A Atkins; Mark R Conaway; Linda Duska; Kimberly A Kelly; Jill K Slack-Davis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  CA125-related tumor cell kinetics variables after chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  G Colloca; A Venturino; I Governato
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Current approaches and challenges in managing and monitoring treatment response in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte S Marcus; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy; Chad A Hamilton; William P McGuire
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Early experiences with PD-1 inhibitor treatment of platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marius C Normann; Martin Türzer; Lien My Diep; Jan Oldenburg; Beata Gajdzik; Olesya Solheim; Erik Rud
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Repeatability of quantitative FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in recurrent ovarian carcinoma: test-retest measurements for tumor FDG uptake, diameter, and volume.

Authors:  Andrea G Rockall; Norbert Avril; Raymond Lam; Robert Iannone; P David Mozley; Christine Parkinson; Donald Bergstrom; Evis Sala; Shah-Jalal Sarker; Iain A McNeish; James D Brenton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 12.531

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.