BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is the most common procedure for correction of congenital pyloric stenosis. The standard laparoscopic approach is based on the three-port technique. In contrast to the standard laparoscopic technique, the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) requires only one incision. We report on our experience with this surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2009 and August 2010 a total of 24 children underwent a laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, 12 in SILS technique. The single incision was carried through the center of the umbilicus. The working instruments were introduced in a two-dimensional direction into the peritoneal cavity via the same umbilical incision. The two groups were compared for patients' demographics, operative report and early postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: All SILS procedures were performed successfully with no conversion rate. There were no differences in the preoperative parameters between the two groups regarding age before surgery and body weight at operation. Operative time and time of full enteral intake was similar to comparable procedures with usage of a standard laparoscopic approach. There were no operative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The early experience described in this study confirms that SILS can be applied for treatment of pyloric stenosis with outcomes similar to the standard laparoscopic surgery.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is the most common procedure for correction of congenital pyloric stenosis. The standard laparoscopic approach is based on the three-port technique. In contrast to the standard laparoscopic technique, the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) requires only one incision. We report on our experience with this surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2009 and August 2010 a total of 24 children underwent a laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, 12 in SILS technique. The single incision was carried through the center of the umbilicus. The working instruments were introduced in a two-dimensional direction into the peritoneal cavity via the same umbilical incision. The two groups were compared for patients' demographics, operative report and early postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: All SILS procedures were performed successfully with no conversion rate. There were no differences in the preoperative parameters between the two groups regarding age before surgery and body weight at operation. Operative time and time of full enteral intake was similar to comparable procedures with usage of a standard laparoscopic approach. There were no operative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The early experience described in this study confirms that SILS can be applied for treatment of pyloric stenosis with outcomes similar to the standard laparoscopic surgery.
Authors: Brendan T Campbell; Kelly McLean; Douglas C Barnhart; Robert A Drongowski; Ronald B Hirschl Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Yury Kozlov; Vladimir Novozhilov; Polina Baradieva; Pavel Krasnov; Konstantin Kovalkov; Oliver J Muensterer Journal: World J Clin Pediatr Date: 2015-11-08