Literature DB >> 22178399

Morphological evolution through integration: a quantitative study of cranial integration in Homo, Pan, Gorilla and Pongo.

Nandini Singh1, Katerina Harvati, Jean-Jacques Hublin, Christian P Klingenberg.   

Abstract

Morphological integration refers to coordinated variation among traits that are closely related in development and/or function. Patterns of integration can offer important insight into the structural relationship between phenotypic units, providing a framework to address questions about phenotypic evolvability and constraints. Integrative features of the primate cranium have recently become a popular subject of study. However, an important question that still remains under-investigated is: what is the pattern of cranial shape integration among closely related hominoids? To address this question, we conducted a Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics study to quantify and analyze shape covariation patterns between different cranial regions in Homo, Pan, Gorilla and Pongo. A total of fifty-six 3D landmarks were collected on 407 adult individuals. We then sub-divided the landmarks corresponding to cranial units as outlined in the 'functional matrix hypothesis.' Sub-dividing the cranium in this manner allowed us to explore patterns of covariation between the face, basicranium and cranial vault, using the two-block partial least squares approach. Our results suggest that integrated shape changes in the hominoid cranium are complex, but that the overall pattern of integration is similar among human and non-human apes. Thus, despite having very distinct morphologies the way in which the face, basicranium and cranial vault covary is shared among these taxa. These results imply that the pattern of cranial integration among hominoids is conserved.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178399     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  25 in total

1.  If the skull fits: magnetic resonance imaging and microcomputed tomography for combined analysis of brain and skull phenotypes in the mouse.

Authors:  Brian J Nieman; Marissa C Blank; Brian B Roman; R Mark Henkelman; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Beyond the functional matrix hypothesis: a network null model of human skull growth for the formation of bone articulations.

Authors:  Borja Esteve-Altava; Diego Rasskin-Gutman
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Measurement error in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors.

Authors:  Jen A Bright; Jesús Marugán-Lobón; Samuel N Cobb; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  TINA manual landmarking tool: software for the precise digitization of 3D landmarks.

Authors:  Anja C Schunke; Paul A Bromiley; Diethard Tautz; Neil A Thacker
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Increased morphological asymmetry, evolvability and plasticity in human brain evolution.

Authors:  Aida Gómez-Robles; William D Hopkins; Chet C Sherwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Effects of cranial integration on hominid endocranial shape.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; Thibaut Bienvenu; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Asymmetry of the midfacial skeleton of eastern lowland gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and potential association with frontal lobe asymmetries.

Authors:  Yann Heuzé; Antoine Balzeau
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.895

9.  Control of corrosive bacterial community by bronopol in industrial water system.

Authors:  Jayaraman Narenkumar; Nachimuthu Ramesh; Aruliah Rajasekar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Allometric disparity in rodent evolution.

Authors:  Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.