BACKGROUND: The shortage of doctors and nurses, along with future expansion into rural clinics, will require that the majority of clinic visits by HIV infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are managed by non-doctors. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a screening protocol to determine which patients needed a full clinical assessment and which patients were stable enough to receive their medications without a doctor's consultation. For this study, we developed an electronic, handheld tool to guide non-physician counselors through screening questions. METHODS: Patients visiting two ART clinics in South Africa for routine follow-up visits between March 2007 and April 2008 were included in our study. Each patient was screened by non-physician counselors using the handheld device and then received a full clinical assessment. Clinicians' report on whether full clinical assessment had been necessary was used as the gold standard for determining "required referral". Observations were randomly divided into two datasets--989 for developing a referral protocol and 200 for validating protocol performance. RESULTS: A third of patients had at least one physical complaint, and 16% had five or more physical complaints. 38% of patients required referral for full clinical assessment. We identify a subset of questions which are 87% sensitive and 47% specific for recommended patient referral. CONCLUSIONS: The final screening protocol is highly sensitive and could reduce burden on ART clinicians by 30%. The uptake and acceptance of the handheld tool to support implementation of the protocol was high. Further examination of the data reveals several important questions to include in future referral algorithms to improve sensitivity and specificity. Based on these results, we identify a refined algorithm to explore in future evaluations. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: The shortage of doctors and nurses, along with future expansion into rural clinics, will require that the majority of clinic visits by HIV infectedpatients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are managed by non-doctors. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a screening protocol to determine which patients needed a full clinical assessment and which patients were stable enough to receive their medications without a doctor's consultation. For this study, we developed an electronic, handheld tool to guide non-physician counselors through screening questions. METHODS:Patients visiting two ART clinics in South Africa for routine follow-up visits between March 2007 and April 2008 were included in our study. Each patient was screened by non-physician counselors using the handheld device and then received a full clinical assessment. Clinicians' report on whether full clinical assessment had been necessary was used as the gold standard for determining "required referral". Observations were randomly divided into two datasets--989 for developing a referral protocol and 200 for validating protocol performance. RESULTS: A third of patients had at least one physical complaint, and 16% had five or more physical complaints. 38% of patients required referral for full clinical assessment. We identify a subset of questions which are 87% sensitive and 47% specific for recommended patient referral. CONCLUSIONS: The final screening protocol is highly sensitive and could reduce burden on ART clinicians by 30%. The uptake and acceptance of the handheld tool to support implementation of the protocol was high. Further examination of the data reveals several important questions to include in future referral algorithms to improve sensitivity and specificity. Based on these results, we identify a refined algorithm to explore in future evaluations. Copyright Â
Authors: Vitali Sintchenko; Enrico Coiera; Jonathan R Iredell; Gwendolyn L Gilbert Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003-10-05 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Alexandra Calmy; Elise Klement; Roger Teck; Daniel Berman; Bernard Pécoul; Laurent Ferradini Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-12-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Michel A Missinou; Christopher H O Olola; Saadou Issifou; Pierre-Blaise Matsiegui; Ayola A Adegnika; Steffen Borrmann; David Wypij; Terrie E Taylor; Peter G Kremsner Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Amy Sarah Ginsburg; Jaclyn Delarosa; Waylon Brunette; Shahar Levari; Mitch Sundt; Clarice Larson; Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang; Sam Newton; Gaetano Borriello; Richard Anderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amy Sarah Ginsburg; Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang; Gwen Ambler; Jaclyn Delarosa; Waylon Brunette; Shahar Levari; Clarice Larson; Mitch Sundt; Sam Newton; Gaetano Borriello; Richard Anderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher J Gill; Ngoc Bao Le; Nafisa Halim; Cao Thi Hue Chi; Viet Ha Nguyen; Rachael Bonawitz; Pham Vu Hoang; Hoang Long Nguyen; Phan Thi Thu Huong; Anna Larson Williams; Ngoc Anh Le; Lora Sabin Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2018-02-26
Authors: Ashwin Vasan; Manzi Anatole; Catherine Mezzacappa; Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Fulgence Nkikabahizi; Marc Hagenimana; Aphrodis Ndayisaba; Felix R Cyamatare; Bonaventure Nzeyimana; Peter Drobac; Neil Gupta Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Lawrence C Long; Sydney B Rosen; Alana Brennan; Faith Moyo; Celeste Sauls; Denise Evans; Shookdev L Modi; Ian Sanne; Matthew P Fox Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 3.240