Literature DB >> 22177883

Optical modeling of a corneal inlay in real eyes to increase depth of focus: optimum centration and residual defocus.

Juan Tabernero1, Pablo Artal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the optimum position to center a small-aperture corneal inlay and the effect of residual defocus in the surgical eye to maximize depth of focus.
SETTING: Laboratorio de Óptica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: Personalized eye models were built using actual data (corneal topography, eye length, ocular aberrations, and eye alignment). A small aperture 1.6 mm in diameter was placed at the corneal plane in each model. The monochromatic and polychromatic Strehl ratios were calculated as a function of the pinhole position. Different residual defocus values were also incorporated into the models, and the through-focus Strehl ratios were calculated.
RESULTS: Sixteen eye models were built. For most subjects, the optimum location of the aperture for distance vision was close to the corneal reflex position. For a given optimized centration of the aperture, the best compromise of depth of focus was obtained when the eyes had some residual myopic defocus (range -0.75 to -1.00 diopter [D]). Strehl ratio values were over 0.1 for far distance, which led to visual acuities better than 20/20. The depth of focus was 2.50 D with a mean near visual acuity of Jaeger 1 or better.
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with little astigmatism and aberrations, the optimum centration of the small aperture was near the corneal reflex position. To improve optical outcomes with the inlay, some small residual myopia and correction of corneal astigmatism might be required.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22177883     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of FDA safety and efficacy data for KAMRA and Raindrop corneal inlays.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Jordan D Desautels; Ryan T Wallace; Nicholas Koen; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Binocular summation and visual function with induced anisocoria and monovision.

Authors:  José J Castro; Margarita Soler; Carolina Ortiz; José R Jiménez; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Comparison of binocular through-focus visual acuity with monovision and a small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Christina Schwarz; Silvestre Manzanera; Pedro M Prieto; Enrique J Fernández; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.

Authors:  Sotiris Plainis; Dionysia Petratou; Trisevgeni Giannakopoulou; Hema Radhakrishnan; Ioannis G Pallikaris; W Neil Charman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date.

Authors:  Em Arlt; Em Krall; S Moussa; G Grabner; Ak Dexl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 6.  Clinical utility of the KAMRA corneal inlay.

Authors:  Shehzad Anjam Naroo; Paramdeep Singh Bilkhu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18

7.  Impact on stereo-acuity of two presbyopia correction approaches: monovision and small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernández; Christina Schwarz; Pedro M Prieto; Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 8.  Presbyopic correction on the cornea.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-13

9.  Centration axis in refractive surgery.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma; Colm McAlinden
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-24

10.  Vignetting and field of view with the KAMRA corneal inlay.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Susanne Goebels; Nóra Szentmáry; Berthold Seitz; Timo Eppig
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.